Started By
Message
re: Breast Jobs in CFB
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:46 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Posted on 5/7/19 at 12:46 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Yes you are. If you want to fool people you should try posting less outlandish things that have at least some basis in fact.
Oh, because it wasn't outlandish when the LSU fan tried to claim LSU was the 5th best job in the college football and #1 in the SEC, but the guy pointing out the reasons why it wasn't true - well that's just outlandish.
1
Posted on 5/7/19 at 1:36 pm to 3down10
quote:
Oh, because it wasn't outlandish when the LSU fan tried to claim LSU was the 5th best job in the college football and #1 in the SEC
Did I say that? I didn’t see the post you’re referring to, can you link it?
quote:
but the guy pointing out the reasons why it wasn't true - well that's just outlandish.
Yeah that’s not what you did.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 2:36 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Did I say that? I didn’t see the post you’re referring to, can you link it?
You mean you missed the entire thing that sparked the conversation?
I don't really care about LSU enough to just randomly mention them.
LINK
Posted on 5/7/19 at 2:47 pm to Captain Crown
quote:
Captain Crown
I nominate whomever that is in your sig.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 2:47 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
Alabama not on list because will be a post-Saban nightmare. All above have certain recruiting /football culture/branding/ facilities/money / tradition advantages that make them unique.
You honestly believe that Clemson wouldn't be a post-Dabo nightmare?
Posted on 5/7/19 at 3:26 pm to skrayper
Posted on 5/7/19 at 3:44 pm to allin2010
I like the one on top, nice pic, starting to heat up on here.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 3:45 pm to 3down10
Not having Alabama is absurd
LSU/Bama/UGA/Florida all have similar resources. Florida and UGA have more talent in their states so I would put them #1 and #2 in the league and top 5 nationally. I think Alabama and LSU are comparable and in that 6-10 range but I’m sure you’ll disagree with having Bama that low and that’s fine. A&M has money but a lot of intangibles going against them. IMO they are a literal rich man’s Auburn and in that 10-15 range.
Your response that LSU is not even close to Top 10 is more outlandish than the link you just gave me, absent leaving Bama off completely which as I said is beyond silly.
LSU/Bama/UGA/Florida all have similar resources. Florida and UGA have more talent in their states so I would put them #1 and #2 in the league and top 5 nationally. I think Alabama and LSU are comparable and in that 6-10 range but I’m sure you’ll disagree with having Bama that low and that’s fine. A&M has money but a lot of intangibles going against them. IMO they are a literal rich man’s Auburn and in that 10-15 range.
Your response that LSU is not even close to Top 10 is more outlandish than the link you just gave me, absent leaving Bama off completely which as I said is beyond silly.
This post was edited on 5/7/19 at 3:47 pm
Posted on 5/7/19 at 5:35 pm to chillmonster
Still no pics by OP.
Banhammer!!!!
Banhammer!!!!
Posted on 5/7/19 at 9:38 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Not having Alabama is absurd
He's butthurt, so I overlooked it.
quote:
LSU/Bama/UGA/Florida all have similar resources. Florida and UGA have more talent in their states so I would put them #1 and #2 in the league and top 5 nationally. I think Alabama and LSU are comparable and in that 6-10 range but I’m sure you’ll disagree with having Bama that low and that’s fine. A&M has money but a lot of intangibles going against them. IMO they are a literal rich man’s Auburn and in that 10-15 range.
Your response that LSU is not even close to Top 10 is more outlandish than the link you just gave me, absent leaving Bama off completely which as I said is beyond silly.
As I've pointed out, you have Coach O for a reason. Just like when Alabama had Shula, it was for a reason.
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News