Started By
Message
re: Best Defense in the top 10?
Posted on 12/3/19 at 4:52 pm to HurricaneTiger
Posted on 12/3/19 at 4:52 pm to HurricaneTiger
Dawgs
Posted on 12/3/19 at 4:53 pm to tylerdurden24
quote:
ITT: high schoolers telling people one great player makes a defense instead of a great 11
Middle schooler's who can't read and make assumptions.
Their unit is actually performing better and they have elite players and quite possibly, the best defensive player int he country.
I am so fricking sorry everything that doesn't have UGA #1 or a UGA player at #1 triggers you guys!
Oh, CEH better than Swift.....
This post was edited on 12/3/19 at 4:54 pm
Posted on 12/3/19 at 4:57 pm to JayDeerTay84
quote:
Oh, CEH better than Swift
Posted on 12/3/19 at 5:00 pm to Dawgs4lyf3
quote:
Dawgs
I’m leaning towards them as well, seeing as Michigan was able to move the ball pretty easily, and would have kept up in the last game if not for drops, an offsides, and a fumbled snap.
UGA has had an unflinching performance against every team they’ve played, until they get to the fourth where they get a little gassed from their O being bad. I think LSU will have more success vs OSU(if we do wind up playing) than UGA while both units are fresh. However, Clemson is still an unknown.
Posted on 12/3/19 at 5:04 pm to HurricaneTiger
OSU, plus they have the offense to keep them off the field.
Posted on 12/3/19 at 5:05 pm to HurricaneTiger
Chase Young is the best player on any defense in the country. UGA has waves of similarly talented, well coached, disciplined defenders. No huge stars (save JR Reed perhaps).
Tough to say til we see more top 10 matchups
Tough to say til we see more top 10 matchups
Posted on 12/3/19 at 5:06 pm to HurricaneTiger
It’s still Clemson until proven otherwise.
Posted on 12/3/19 at 5:24 pm to JayDeerTay84
quote:
Young is almost honey badger level disruption
Hmmm....Did Young play against Meechigan, I can't find any stats for him.
Posted on 12/3/19 at 5:26 pm to ellis197575
I don’t know why some of you think not recording a sac while double and triple team is a negative.
Posted on 12/3/19 at 5:49 pm to JayDeerTay84
A sack?
He didn't have a single tackle in the entire game. And go watch it again, he was not double-teamed the entire game. Don't fall for the false narrative being pushed. The kid is really good but the media is making him out to be more than he is. Do you know the likely-hood of an elite DE playing an entire game against their biggest rival and having....
0 Tackles
0 Sacks
0 Tackles For Loss
2 QB Hurries
Imagine a Heisman level QB having a game with simply zero passing TD's...his Heisman candidacy would probably be over. Elite players get it done no matter what, that's the difference between really good and elite.
He didn't have a single tackle in the entire game. And go watch it again, he was not double-teamed the entire game. Don't fall for the false narrative being pushed. The kid is really good but the media is making him out to be more than he is. Do you know the likely-hood of an elite DE playing an entire game against their biggest rival and having....
0 Tackles
0 Sacks
0 Tackles For Loss
2 QB Hurries
Imagine a Heisman level QB having a game with simply zero passing TD's...his Heisman candidacy would probably be over. Elite players get it done no matter what, that's the difference between really good and elite.
Posted on 12/3/19 at 5:53 pm to BamaTide126728
quote:
Did you watch the game? They were frickin triple teaming him.
We did the same every team did chipping him with TE and RB
Posted on 12/3/19 at 5:55 pm to boot
quote:
OSU, plus they have the offense to keep them off the field.
I don't think we can definitively say this because they haven't faced a single offense in the top 30. They play against offensively challenged teams and people swear their D is awesome.
You're supposed to look amazing against less-talented teams. OSU has a LARGE talent gap on every team they've played this year. However, LSU and Clemson (as well as UGA) has every bit as much talent and I guarantee OSU numbers on BOTH sides of the ball will look drastically different no matter which of these teams they face.
IMO there's a reason the committee wants to keep them #1 and in a spot to play the #4 team.
Posted on 12/3/19 at 6:02 pm to ellis197575
Yea it’s hard to tell with OSU because they haven’t really played a dynamic, high level offense. Obviously they are talented but that’s not everything.
I think I would take the Dawgs but don’t discount Clemson just based on Brent Venebles alone.
All 3 are damn good.
I think I would take the Dawgs but don’t discount Clemson just based on Brent Venebles alone.
All 3 are damn good.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News