Started By
Message
1
Posted on 5/31/12 at 3:36 pm to diddydirtyAubie
quote:
I caught it...just didn't care to comment.
You can use that sig too if you want since you are already rockin a free memphis one.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 3:36 pm to ThaKaptin
quote:
I just find it odd that with everyone in this thread, the only 2 people that caught that are rocking my sigs.
Maybe it's bc we actually read. Then we take it a step further and actually comprehend what we read
Posted on 5/31/12 at 3:36 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
quote:
There is nothing unfair about a perennially top SEC team in LSU playing an equal team in UF every year. What isn't fair is asking a OM or MSU team to play them every year.
What in the Hell is it about people in the state of Alabama having no fricking brains? We aren't asking to trade permanent opponents with Ole Miss. We're asking to do away with permanent opponents altogether and rotate the other division through two spots instead of one, so we can play them with reasonable frequency.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 3:36 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
Jesus, why not just have LSU join the Big east and get the auto BCS invite every year, wouldn't THAT be ideal?
I suggested this earlier, fwiw.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 3:36 pm to diddydirtyAubie
quote:
Most points scored, bitches.
Premier League style.
EPL uses goal difference not scored
Posted on 5/31/12 at 3:37 pm to Nuts4LSU
quote:
Because they'd get to keep their precious traditional rivalries with Tennessee and Georgia, and with each other.
too bad our precious rivalries hold more weight than your AD's moaning
Posted on 5/31/12 at 3:37 pm to Nuts4LSU
quote:
quote:
Why would those changes make Alabama and Auburn fans happy?
Because they'd get to keep their precious traditional rivalries with Tennessee and Georgia, and with each other.
True and the Florida-UT and Florida-UGA games would be preserved... I see no other way to maintain all the rivalries... LSU would like it because they would be basically swapping TAMU for Bama and Mizzo for Auburn.. LSU gets to keep its rivalry with Arkie. Plus you can go to a true 6-2, so in most years, LSU would play against good teams from the east..
Posted on 5/31/12 at 3:38 pm to Nuts4LSU
quote:
We're asking to do away with permanent opponents altogether and rotate the other division through two spots instead of one, so we can play them with reasonable frequency.
And people wonder why LSU can't find a rival.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 3:39 pm to Damn Good Dawg
quote:
too bad our precious rivalries hold more weight than your AD's moaning
Funny that you use OUR. As I posted earlier:
quote:
What the really messed up thing about all of this is, if UT got moved into the West, Bama would sell out the Deep South's oldest rivalry in a heartbeat. The Gumps, Mountain Gumps, Barners, and Puppies are aligned right now, but let's not pretend that isn't in self-interest. The second Bama is offered a solution that preserves the third saturday game, they will gladly put all of the nails in the coffin of the Deep South's oldest rivalry and carry that casket to the grave yard.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 3:39 pm to mgmbamafan
Still unfair to LSU.. Would have to play either Bama, Florida, Georgia, Auburn, South Carolina, Tennessee, or Kentucky every year in Atlanta.. Unacceptable..Posted on 5/31/12 at 3:39 pm to crimsonsaint
quote:
What in the Hell is it about people in the state of Alabama having no fricking brains?
They seem to have a really hard time with reading comprehension. Crimsonsaint in particular
Posted on 5/31/12 at 3:40 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
EPL uses goal difference not scored
they use both.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 3:41 pm to diddydirtyAubie
quote:Top 7 teams from the prior year are in the championship division, with the other 7 relegated to the bowl contenders division. Then play a 6-2 schedule.
Premier League style.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 3:41 pm to Nuts4LSU
quote:
What in the Hell is it about people in the state of Alabama having no fricking brains?
You shouldn't throw stones in glass houses. LA isn't full of Einsteins.
This post was edited on 5/31/12 at 3:46 pm
Posted on 5/31/12 at 3:41 pm to WDE24
quote:
Top 7 teams from the prior year are in the championship division, with the other 7 relegated to the bowl contenders division. Then play a 6-2 schedule.
Doesn't preserve the traditional rivalries, but I love the idea of relegation. We would call the lower division "the East."
Posted on 5/31/12 at 3:42 pm to Nuts4LSU
quote:
What in the Hell is it about people in the state of Alabama having no fricking brains? We aren't asking to trade permanent opponents with Ole Miss. We're asking to do away with permanent opponents altogether and rotate the other division through two spots instead of one, so we can play them with reasonable frequency.
looks more like you're trying to run away from the Florida game FWIW.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 3:42 pm to therick711
what, are you like linking your self to prove your point
Posted on 5/31/12 at 3:43 pm to AUnite
quote:
LA isn't full of Einstein's.
Posted on 5/31/12 at 3:43 pm to getback
quote:
Still unfair to LSU.. Would have to play either Bama, Florida, Georgia, Auburn, South Carolina, Tennessee, or Kentucky every year in Atlanta.. Unacceptable..
Division I
Kentucky
LSU
Ole Miss
Mississippi State
Missouri
Texas A&M
Vanderbilt
Division II
Alabama
Arkansas
Auburn
Florida
Georgia
South Carolina
Tennessee
Expect the LSU AD and Miles to submit this recommendation for re-alignment.
Page 4 of 27
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News