Started By
Message

re: Auburn FB historically: most underrated SEC program?

Posted on 5/2/20 at 6:32 pm to
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84831 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 6:32 pm to
SOS isn't by itself dispositive of anything.
Posted by Mithridates6
Member since Oct 2019
8220 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 6:34 pm to
So Oklahoma is the program of the last 25 years then with all their impressive big 12 titles, right?
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84831 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 6:38 pm to
I said it wasn't dispositive on it's own i didn't say it wasn't a factor

But at the same time yeah OU is a top 5-7 program of the last 20 years easy.
Posted by gladchiefisgone
Member since Sep 2010
1793 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 6:46 pm to
quote:

Auburn vs Tennessee was glorious for a long time.


Auburn leads the series 27-22-3
Posted by Mithridates6
Member since Oct 2019
8220 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 6:50 pm to
Well I disagree, we should weigh Auburn's success differently due to them having to play 4 of the big six every season before 1992. That's insane
Posted by atlanta917
Atlanta
Member since Jan 2017
5690 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 6:50 pm to
Auburn is the most bipolar SEC team. One year they blow up the other they get blown up.
This post was edited on 5/2/20 at 6:51 pm
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84831 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 6:54 pm to
that could be a factor in a tie but Auburn, while a very good program, just isn't quite on the level to where you would say they are in the top half of the big six.
Posted by Mithridates6
Member since Oct 2019
8220 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 7:02 pm to
Ok well yeah I give them the tiebreaker over UF then, since they had a tougher schedule and they have had multiple undefeated seasons vs none for the Gators
Posted by WRhodesTider
Birmingham, Al
Member since Nov 2005
868 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

I'm not an Auburn fan, but I will: on average, they've had the toughest schedule by far of the SEC's big six. They didn't get to beat on Vandy, UK, MSU or UM annually (only the last two since 1992)


Auburn played State annually a long time before expansion. Shug was one of the original cowbell complainers.
Posted by Mithridates6
Member since Oct 2019
8220 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 7:20 pm to
You're right i misremembered that. They were fortunate to almost entirely avoid UMiss when the Sharks were a powerhouse in the 1950s-60s
LINK
Posted by droliver
Member since Nov 2012
971 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 9:38 pm to
"Michigan State and A&M aren't even on the same planet as Auburn historically though despite easier schedules"

Michigan State has won six national championships and nine Big Ten championships. In recent times (The Dantonio tenure 2007-2019) their record was 114-57. Auburn's record over that same time 109-61. MSU also has more conference championships (3 to 2) over that time. Saying they aren't on the "same planet" ignores what the facts on the ground are.

While TA&M is certainly behind Auburn, they are historically a competative programs and are only 27 wins behind them all time
Posted by MrAUTigers
Florida
Member since Sep 2013
28280 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

Michigan State has won six national championships and nine Big Ten championships. In recent times (The Dantonio tenure 2007-2019) their record was 114-57. Auburn's record over that same time 109-61. MSU also has more conference championships (3 to 2) over that time. Saying they aren't on the "same planet" ignores what the facts on the ground are.


You don't understand what "historically" means.

All time wins

13. Auburn 776

27. Michigan State 708


Who do you think has done it against stiffer competition?
Posted by MrAUTigers
Florida
Member since Sep 2013
28280 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 10:20 pm to
quote:

I know you’re from Auburn because you chose a season when LSU didn’t go undefeated.


I chose a season where you had a chance to win the NC while on probation for major infractions.
Posted by Mithridates6
Member since Oct 2019
8220 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 10:23 pm to
Even throwing competition discrepancy aside Auburn's "floor" was worse in that time span (2012 season), but yall nearly had two NCs. Michigan State's "ceiling" was winning the Big Ten and getting utterly obliterated by Bamuh in the CFP
Posted by Jesterea
Member since Nov 2011
1044 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 10:24 pm to
So what would a ranking of SEC programs historically look like?

Actually, that would probably work as it's own thread, but I'm sure it's been done to death.
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68389 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 10:30 pm to
Maybe it's because I'm from Louisiana, but it's LSU. They hate us. I mean people think we are going to have a losing season now burrow is gone. When we've been the only program to win at least 8 games since what ever time frame.

Auburn, Bama, Clemson, tOSU, OU, UF prob missing some others, have all had worse seasons than LSU. We have been the most consistent program for 20 years yet people act like every title was some fluke.

No, sit down and shut up.
This post was edited on 5/2/20 at 10:31 pm
Posted by droliver
Member since Nov 2012
971 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 11:55 pm to
quote:

You don't understand what "historically" means.
All time wins
13. Auburn 776
27. Michigan State 708



No, apparently you don't. Both over the course of the programs 100+ year history and over the last 15 years, Auburn and MSU are fairly similar in achievement in W/L, conference championships, and overall # of national championships. They've both competed in the top two conferences over that period. They have substantially similar resumes actually even though it's not something most SEC fans think about as a comp.
Posted by InGAButLoveBama
Member since Jan 2018
924 posts
Posted on 5/3/20 at 12:13 am to
quote:

re: Auburn FB historically: most underrated SEC program?Posted on 5/2/20 at 3:03 pm to InGAButLoveBama
quote:
Except Auburn officials were admitting that the trees were DYING at that moment, from years of abuse from their own fans.


Link or it just confirms what we already know to be true anyways...you are a lying POS. Legitimate Bama fans won't even acknowledge you.


I will be the bigger man and refrain from making this personal. But do see the following AUBURN University produced piece from 2007, three years before Updyke stupidly changed the narrative, and cruelly hastened the death of admittedly gorgeous trees : LINK Read and weep. I would copy and paste the key lines in the piece, but it is the type of document with text that can not be copied and pasted.

This is not even the news piece I read a year or so before Updyke did what he did. And it was less of an indictment as the piece I recall reading, again, BEFORE Updyke did what he did. It is just the first article I could find that mentions that the trees were in fact dying, partially due to years of pressure washing, well BEFORE Updyke poured poison on those tree roots, hastening the process.

Your toilet paper tradition was putting great stress on those trees, hastening their death in fact before Updyke came along. They were not old trees relative to they typical lifespan of that kind of oak, so it is not like they were just old and thus nearing death. Deal with it. You should apologize for calling me a liar, and grow the f up, but we all know that won't happen.

All Bama fans I know loathe Updyke, but also know that your trees were already dying. Take it up with your own school for admitting something BEFORE Updyke allowed Auburn to shift the narrative and give Alabama a black eye.

Because so many stories were written about Updyke, it is hard to find more articles documenting my claim. I know that certain Bama fans have archived proof, in addition to what I posted, but not sure where to find it. I am not allowed to post on the Alabama forum here, so I can't ask anyone there to post the additional archived proof.

We can disagree and coexist, but don't call me a POS liar and think I won't prove you wrong.
This post was edited on 5/3/20 at 12:33 am
Posted by Tigerman97
Member since Jun 2014
10354 posts
Posted on 5/3/20 at 8:57 am to
Our schedule is a chicken and the egg argument...with a schedule more comparable to our other SEC foes we'd likely have an average of 9.2-9.4 wins a season. However, we have used the difficulty of our schedule historically to improve our recruiting since we aren't a flagship school name. So Auburn has benefitted in this way from playing a harder schedule even if it cost us a few more loses. IMO 15 year old kids remember big wins more than loses.
This post was edited on 5/4/20 at 8:23 am
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
59442 posts
Posted on 5/3/20 at 9:12 am to
quote:

They didn't get to beat on Vandy, UK, MSU or UM annually (only the last two since 1992)

State has played Auburn annually since the 40's and regularly before then. There's probably a 100 games between us. However, State did play a lot of their "home" games in Birmingham.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter