Started By
Message
Arch: on the goal line?
Posted on 1/11/25 at 7:12 am
Posted on 1/11/25 at 7:12 am
At first and goal at the one, why not Arch?
17
Posted on 1/11/25 at 7:13 am to makersmark1
That pitch play will haunt Texas fans for a long time. Just an absolutely awful playcall.
Posted on 1/11/25 at 7:20 am to Swagga
Any Georgia, LSU or Bama squad would have said… frick it.. we have 4 tries and we’re going “that way”! They would not have ran that play.
It what in overtime last year against Michigan on 4th down of overtime from the two, running Milroe up the middle didn’t bother me
It what in overtime last year against Michigan on 4th down of overtime from the two, running Milroe up the middle didn’t bother me
Posted on 1/11/25 at 7:23 am to RTRnFlorida
quote:
Any Georgia, LSU or Bama squad would have said… frick it.. we have 4 tries and we’re going “that way”
True story. That was a boneheaded series all around.
Posted on 1/11/25 at 7:35 am to RTRnFlorida
quote:“would not have run”
would not have ran
Come on baw, use the past subjunctive case. You’re referring to a hypothetical in the past. You’re better than that.
Posted on 1/11/25 at 7:39 am to Demosthenian
It’s painful how obvious it was to put Arch in there. Sark showed his arse last night.
Posted on 1/11/25 at 8:01 am to makersmark1
Or get under center and tush push QB sneak with anyone at QB 4 times in a row
Posted on 1/11/25 at 8:11 am to Jabontik
Texas didn’t think they’d be successful doing that and that’s why they didn’t try?
Did you see Ohios D -Line?? Them boys were large and in charge
Did you see Ohios D -Line?? Them boys were large and in charge
Posted on 1/11/25 at 8:12 am to Demosthenian
quote:
Come on baw, use the past subjunctive case. You’re
He’s an Auburn man, probably thinks subjunctive case is a motion in court.
Posted on 1/11/25 at 8:16 am to makersmark1
Common sense isn't so common.
Posted on 1/11/25 at 8:18 am to makersmark1
Toss out of the gun was a horrendous play call
Posted on 1/11/25 at 8:26 am to makersmark1
Imagine how much it would be worse if they blew it with the guy Texas fans think will save them.
Posted on 1/11/25 at 8:31 am to makersmark1
quote:
At first and goal at the one, why not Arch?
Because Sark.
Posted on 1/11/25 at 8:50 am to Swagga
What’s crazy about that pitch play was how all-over it Ohio state was. It looked like a complete jailbreak.
Posted on 1/11/25 at 9:10 am to Shamoan
quote:
What’s crazy about that pitch play was how all-over it Ohio State was. It looked like a complete jailbreak.
Kind of like they knew exactly what the play call was.
B1G is the sign stealing conference.
First down on the one yard line and goal to go and the Shorthorns find a way to turn it into 7 points for the Suckeyes.
This post was edited on 1/11/25 at 9:13 am
Posted on 1/11/25 at 9:13 am to makersmark1
I have been wondering if he got his bell rung on the near fumble earlier in the game.
His arms and legs went limp right before he lost control of the ball and he looked really dazed when getting up.
His arms and legs went limp right before he lost control of the ball and he looked really dazed when getting up.
Posted on 1/11/25 at 10:09 am to Windy City
That 1st down stop by OSU spooked Sark obviously.
2nd down play call was ballgame
2nd down play call was ballgame
Posted on 1/11/25 at 10:19 am to Windy City
quote:
I have been wondering if he got his bell rung on the near fumble earlier in the game.
His arms and legs went limp right before he lost control of the ball and he looked really dazed when getting up.
I think you're right.
It wasn't a fumble but he looked woozy after the shot in the head
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 1/11/25 at 10:32 am to Chip82
Posted on 1/11/25 at 10:33 am to makersmark1
At first and goal at the one, why not Arch?
On the play at midfield when Manning ran for 8 yards he took a pretty hard hit to the helmet that had some thinking targeting should have been called. It was hard enough to cause him to lose the ball though he was ruled down so the argument could be made that the kid had already taken a shot to the head and a goal line run was inviting another.
Then for you conspiracy theorists there is the Oklahoma Argument. Last year in the RRS the Sooners stuffed the whorns in a similar situation and Sarkisian may have reasoned that it was better to run wide against a better D line than what he faced that day.
On the play at midfield when Manning ran for 8 yards he took a pretty hard hit to the helmet that had some thinking targeting should have been called. It was hard enough to cause him to lose the ball though he was ruled down so the argument could be made that the kid had already taken a shot to the head and a goal line run was inviting another.
Then for you conspiracy theorists there is the Oklahoma Argument. Last year in the RRS the Sooners stuffed the whorns in a similar situation and Sarkisian may have reasoned that it was better to run wide against a better D line than what he faced that day.
Page 1 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News