Started By
Message
re: American Press: SEC Scheduling conspiracy?
Posted on 2/13/13 at 3:27 pm to therick711
Posted on 2/13/13 at 3:27 pm to therick711
quote:
Good. Now that you've settled that, get out of the thread. You have nothing to add.
Seems to me like you have nothing to add to this conversation either. You've done nothing but attack me this whole time.
1
Posted on 2/13/13 at 3:27 pm to therick711
quote:
quote:One could say it's not fair that Alabamas gets a weak TN every year and you guys get a strong Florida but.... You do need to realize that Alabama was not done any favors at the time this was started. TN was no cupcake back then but it has worked out in their favor lately. When it was first done Alabama had two permanent opponents and it was done a favor on the second one. There was balance because there were two. Those that don't know history are doomed to make misleading points on the internet about it.
Touche'
I had forgotten about that. I just read an article just now and it didn't mention the two permanent opponents. Hell, I was working every Saturday back then and I had went a couple decades without seeing college ball games on Saturdays.
Damn, you hear that? I said I missed college football on Saturdays for a decade. I might catch a game that I got to hear on the radio if the boss was gone.
Posted on 2/13/13 at 3:28 pm to More Cowbell 1963
Who was our second cross-division rival? Tennessee and who else?
Posted on 2/13/13 at 3:28 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
Seems to me like you have nothing to add to this conversation either. You've done nothing but attack me this whole time.
You make it so easy between being wrong and being irrelevant, it is hard to not blow what you think passes for a point out of the water. Also, I might need a ruling, but I don't think it is attacking someone by calling them stupid when their posts create a pretty air tight record suggesting it has to be true.
Posted on 2/13/13 at 3:29 pm to More Cowbell 1963
quote:
Touche'
Posted on 2/13/13 at 3:29 pm to RollTide1987
Just kinda skimmed the thread but did no one notice this at the end of the article?
quote:
Scooter Hobbs covers LSU sports
Posted on 2/13/13 at 3:29 pm to therick711
I'm still waiting for a relevant point.
Posted on 2/13/13 at 3:30 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
Who was our second cross-division rival? Tennessee and who else?
It rhymes with Shmanderbilt.
Posted on 2/13/13 at 3:31 pm to thatguy1892
quote:
thatguy1892
Someone finally gets it by stating the obvious. Well done.
Posted on 2/13/13 at 3:31 pm to thatguy1892
quote:
Just kinda skimmed the thread but did no one notice this at the end of the article?
probably post on Tiger Rant
Posted on 2/13/13 at 3:31 pm to thatguy1892
i didnt know that but its not surprising. never heard of the guy but he pretty had to be somewhat local. no one else is willing to acknowledge it.
Posted on 2/13/13 at 3:31 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
I'm still waiting for a relevant point.
You wouldn't know one if it jumped off of Brian Dennehy Stadium and punched you in the face. So you'll likely be waiting awhile. Don't hold your breath. It would be dangerous.
Posted on 2/13/13 at 3:31 pm to JPLSU1981
Article should have mentioned UGA's schedule...
Posted on 2/13/13 at 3:32 pm to Cockopotamus
quote:
Article should have mentioned UGA's schedule...
Now you've gone and done it!
Posted on 2/13/13 at 3:32 pm to therick711
quote:
It rhymes with Shmanderbilt.
Posted on 2/13/13 at 3:33 pm to RollTide1987
Too obvious? I'll have to think of a better one next time.
You'll be interested to know that Bama is 61-18-4 against the Commies, including 26-0 since expansion. Bama's second permanent opponent hadn't registered a win against it since 1984. To get to a second win, you'd have to travel back to 1969.
Favor . . . Done.
You'll be interested to know that Bama is 61-18-4 against the Commies, including 26-0 since expansion. Bama's second permanent opponent hadn't registered a win against it since 1984. To get to a second win, you'd have to travel back to 1969.
Favor . . . Done.
This post was edited on 2/13/13 at 3:36 pm
Posted on 2/13/13 at 3:34 pm to therick711
quote:
Too obvious? I'll have to think of a better one next time.
Nah. It took me a few minutes to figure it out.
Posted on 2/13/13 at 3:34 pm to TutHillTiger
quote:
If you Mfers are going to defend this bullshite then defend it with facts which u have fricking none not a signal god damn one. If u are stupid enough to talk about rotation u are just shoeing u didn't go to any college more or less bama. There is no rotation on these games due to the addition of A&M and Missouri. This was supposed to be a one year deal one it has go to two. If we were fricking you like this it is all we would hear about on finebaum for 364 days a year and u fricking know it.
Check out this puss.
Posted on 2/13/13 at 3:35 pm to bbap
quote:
I wouldnt say they "intentionally" did it but they had the chance to even it out after year 1 of the nonrotation and instead they made it even worse. to be that inept at your job is hard to fathom.
First of all, LSU's permanent rival is UF and Bama's is Tennessee. One of those teams sucks and one is very good. That alone is going to create a a disperity.
Second, Bama got Missouri in 2012, Vanderbilt and Florida, Florida and USC in 2010 and Kentucky and USC in 2009. Thow in playing Tennessee every year and Georgia in the title game last year, and that's all seven East teams with Kentucky being the most distant matchup. It is hardly without reason they are playing them this year. It's not like they played them in 2011 and are getting them again.
Posted on 2/13/13 at 3:35 pm to crimsonsaint
quote:
crimsonsaint
Stop bring it back to topic. I've worked so hard to keep us off.
Page 5 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News