Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

According to Caesars, 98% of public money is on Auburn to beat Alabama

Posted on 11/26/21 at 11:18 am
Posted by paperwasp
11x HRV tRant Poster of the Week
Member since Sep 2014
22988 posts
Posted on 11/26/21 at 11:18 am


Can this be right?

I can see one way or the other regarding the spread, but 98% on the moneyline?

Are people just willing to risk their money for a +800 payoff, or do they actually believe Auburn is going to win SU?

Posted by ducktale
Member since Sep 2021
1531 posts
Posted on 11/26/21 at 11:20 am to
Odd year.
JHS.
Suspect Bama.

You do the math.
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
62721 posts
Posted on 11/26/21 at 11:21 am to
If it was 98% on one side, why is the moneyline increasing?
Posted by hiremikeleach
Member since Dec 2019
4612 posts
Posted on 11/26/21 at 11:21 am to
Would you bet Alabama -1400? I wouldn’t
Posted by theenemy
Member since Oct 2006
13078 posts
Posted on 11/26/21 at 11:22 am to
Edit...never mind...that is the moneyline.
This post was edited on 11/26/21 at 11:23 am
Posted by paperwasp
11x HRV tRant Poster of the Week
Member since Sep 2014
22988 posts
Posted on 11/26/21 at 11:25 am to
quote:

If it was 98% on one side, why is the moneyline increasing?

Hmm. Good question.
Posted by AUdime
Member since Oct 2012
777 posts
Posted on 11/26/21 at 11:25 am to
The one that matters is the spread to which the public seems to favor Bama covering.
Posted by Ghost of Barnwell
central alabama
Member since Dec 2013
1773 posts
Posted on 11/26/21 at 11:26 am to
It’s obvious you don’t understand how betting works…….
Posted by paperwasp
11x HRV tRant Poster of the Week
Member since Sep 2014
22988 posts
Posted on 11/26/21 at 11:27 am to
quote:

It’s obvious you don’t understand how betting works…….

Obviously not

Posted by coachcrisp
pensacola, fl
Member since Jun 2012
30589 posts
Posted on 11/26/21 at 11:28 am to
Would YOU lay 14:1 that Alabama wins the game?...HELL NO!
What's interesting is the difference between the 1:8 line on Auburn to WIN compared to the 14:1 you'd have to lay for Alabama to win! That's a ton of House spread right there!
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
22527 posts
Posted on 11/26/21 at 11:32 am to
quote:


Can this be right?

I can see one way or the other regarding the spread, but 98% on the moneyline?

Are people just willing to risk their money for a +800 payoff, or do they actually believe Auburn is going to win SU?


You bet on Alabama, and you'll only get a portion of what you bet on for the winnings. I'm not a gambler, so I don't know exactly the amount, I just know if you bet $100, you might get $150 for the win.

You bet on Auburn, and you'll get more in winnings than you bet. You bet $100, and you might get $250 in winnings.

Also, a % doesn't really tell you the volume. My guess is the volume is low since neither are really good bets.

Posted by paperwasp
11x HRV tRant Poster of the Week
Member since Sep 2014
22988 posts
Posted on 11/26/21 at 11:33 am to
quote:

Also, a % doesn't really tell you the volume. My guess is the volume is low since neither are really good bets.

I think you’re exactly right.

I’m guessing the volume is extremely low, and this 98% represents just a handful of people willing to risk a little to win a lot.
Posted by coachcrisp
pensacola, fl
Member since Jun 2012
30589 posts
Posted on 11/26/21 at 11:39 am to
quote:

Can this be right?

I can see one way or the other regarding the spread, but 98% on the moneyline?

Are people just willing to risk their money for a +800 payoff, or do they actually believe Auburn is going to win SU?

It's right!
The difference in the two lines gives the answer. The real gamblers that actually favor Bama aren't gonna lay $14 to win $1, but they will give the 20 1/2 points and lay 11 to 10. The Book has made (purposely) the Bama win Money Line huge to keep the number low.
Posted by TigahJay
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2015
10545 posts
Posted on 11/26/21 at 11:40 am to
quote:

If it was 98% on one side, why is the moneyline increasing?


98% because most people aren’t going to bet on a -1400 payout. ML is going up though because it reflects the spread, and the spread is going up from more people betting Bama.
Posted by Bama Bird
Member since Dec 2011
Member since Mar 2013
19020 posts
Posted on 11/26/21 at 11:43 am to
quote:

$100, you might get $150 for the win


You are correct but winnings would be closer to $7. At -1400, you get $1 in winnings per $14 wagered which no one would take
Posted by Che Boludo
Member since May 2009
18161 posts
Posted on 11/26/21 at 11:46 am to
quote:

Can this be right?

I don't think the Caesars book is trying to illegally release erroneous info, so yes, it is right.

I also don't think Vegas is in the business of losing money.
This post was edited on 11/26/21 at 12:20 pm
Posted by TTsTowel
RIP Bow9den/Coastie
Member since Feb 2010
91640 posts
Posted on 11/26/21 at 11:47 am to
I wouldn’t even bet on Auburn
Posted by TheFourHorsemen
Next door to Ric Flair
Member since Jul 2021
2169 posts
Posted on 11/26/21 at 11:52 am to
This is why casinos make money this is a sucker bet.

95% of money bet is on the spread.

I large bet could change this.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter