Started By
Message

re: A&M supports LSU's desire to not play UF every year

Posted on 5/21/13 at 12:25 pm to
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 5/21/13 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

It has only been the last 5 years that UT has been down that makes it feel inequitable.

No, it was when the 5-1-2 schedule was changed to the 5-2-1 for 2003. That's when Kentucky dropped off of LSU's schedule as a permanent East opponent. At least under the 5-1-2 model each team was given an historically tough opponent, and a historially not so tough opponent.

The fact of the matter is I want to play all of the east teams more often, and not have to wait 12 years between road games against UT and UGA.
Posted by Sheetbend
Member since Apr 2013
1267 posts
Posted on 5/21/13 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

Once again as has been stated many times, when TN was beating Bama like a drum in the mid 90's and reeled off 7 straight wins, did you ever hear a Bama fan suggest we drop them?


Likewise, when Florida was beating LSU like a drum--losing one game to LSU from 1988 to 2001--you never heard an LSU fan suggest they drop them either I bet. So what?

Now Tennessee is dog shite, and Florida is a perennial SEC power.
This post was edited on 5/21/13 at 12:30 pm
Posted by TreyAnastasio
Bitch I'm From Cleveland
Member since Dec 2010
46759 posts
Posted on 5/21/13 at 12:27 pm to
What LSU alter are you
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37575 posts
Posted on 5/21/13 at 12:30 pm to
I don't know why we can't just adopt the Spurrier solution. Only count games within the same division when it comes to determining who wins their division.

Then Bama/UT, Auburn/UGA, LSU/Florida can continue (which they should since they are entertaining games of great value when both teams are good) and the issue of scheduling fairness becomes a non-issue.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54853 posts
Posted on 5/21/13 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

At least under the 5-1-2 model each team was given an historically tough opponent, and a historially not so tough opponent.
Really? Who were AUs two permanent opponents? Did you hear us whining? We miss those days.


Again, all you care about is THE bama obsession. It is obvious despite all of the denials.
This post was edited on 5/21/13 at 12:34 pm
Posted by ibldprplgld
Member since Feb 2008
27782 posts
Posted on 5/21/13 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

I don't know why we can't just adopt the Spurrier solution. Only count games within the same division when it comes to determining who wins their division.

Then Bama/UT, Auburn/UGA, LSU/Florida can continue (which they should since they are entertaining games of great value when both teams are good) and the issue of scheduling fairness becomes a non-issue.


The only argument against this they can come up with is it kills the dynamics between East and West. (a bs excuse)
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57013 posts
Posted on 5/21/13 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

A&M supports LSU's desire to not play UF every year I don't know why we can't just adopt the Spurrier solution. Only count games within the same division when it comes to determining who wins their division. Then Bama/UT, Auburn/UGA, LSU/Florida can continue (which they should since they are entertaining games of great value when both teams are good) and the issue of scheduling fairness becomes a non-issue.


Sure, but are y'all going to whine again when bama loses to the east opponents and lsu wins, yet bama still gets to the title game?
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57013 posts
Posted on 5/21/13 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

The only argument against this they can come up with is it kills the dynamics between East and West. (a bs excuse)


What's the point in playing conference games if they don't count. Why even play cross division games.
Posted by ibldprplgld
Member since Feb 2008
27782 posts
Posted on 5/21/13 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

Again, all you care about is THE bama obsession. It is obvious despite all of the denials.


I guess repeating this over and over again must mean it's true.
Posted by dallasga6
Scrap Metal Magnate...
Member since Mar 2009
26713 posts
Posted on 5/21/13 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

I will make it my life's goal to ruin everything Slive loves if UGA-Auburn is not played every year all because Miles is scared.

Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54853 posts
Posted on 5/21/13 at 12:38 pm to
It being true makes it true. Repeating let's you know all of the other BS you are sputtering is exactly that. Every argument made focuses only on a comparison between LSU and Bama.
Posted by ibldprplgld
Member since Feb 2008
27782 posts
Posted on 5/21/13 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

Why even play cross division games.

Play them. That's not the issue. But don't let them count as a division deciding game.
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57013 posts
Posted on 5/21/13 at 12:38 pm to
Well when you have your blinders on and can only use one team for your argument, it's pretty obvious.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37575 posts
Posted on 5/21/13 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

What's the point in playing conference games if they don't count. Why even play cross division games.



the same reason you play out of conference games

and they obviously still count when it comes to teams hoping to win a NC
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54853 posts
Posted on 5/21/13 at 12:39 pm to
MULLIGAN!!¡!
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57013 posts
Posted on 5/21/13 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

Play them. That's not the issue. But don't let them count as a division deciding game.


Why? It doesn't count towards anything. Might as well disband the sec and have two conferences that just have a permanent prebowl game.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54853 posts
Posted on 5/21/13 at 12:41 pm to
Yeah, but who cares about the rest of the conference, Alabama wouldn't have a schedule advantage over LSU.
This post was edited on 5/21/13 at 12:42 pm
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57013 posts
Posted on 5/21/13 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

the same reason you play out of conference games


Something in this statement needs to be highlighted, underlined and bolded, just not sure what. I'll let you be the judge.
Posted by dallasga6
Scrap Metal Magnate...
Member since Mar 2009
26713 posts
Posted on 5/21/13 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

9 game conference schedule will be here soon enough,

And that's when this thing will be resolved & not sooner. UT-UA & AU-UGA are non-negotiable... Sorry.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37575 posts
Posted on 5/21/13 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

the same reason you play out of conference games


Something in this statement needs to be highlighted, underlined and bolded, just not sure what. I'll let you be the judge.



yes, the word reason... because you refuse to apply it to this subject.

the games between auburn/uga, lsu/florida, alabama/tenn would remain prime-time worthy events with national championship implications
Jump to page
Page First 10 11 12 13 14 ... 17
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 17Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter