Started By
Message
re: 50 years from now could LSU replace Auburn & UT
Posted on 12/2/12 at 9:31 pm to Lieutenant Dan
Posted on 12/2/12 at 9:31 pm to Lieutenant Dan
quote:
And to be quite honest, I don't think Lsu has achieved enough in their history to be able to claim Bama as a rival.
History must not be your thing
Posted on 12/2/12 at 9:31 pm to Lieutenant Dan
quote:
And to be quite honest, I don't think Lsu has achieved enough in their history to be able to claim Bama as a rival.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 9:32 pm to Lieutenant Dan
quote:
And to be quite honest, I don't think Lsu has achieved enough in their history to be able to claim Bama as a rival.
Yet.....AU has
quote:
Thinking of Lsu as a main rival of Bama? Well, it's kind of embarrassing to be honest.
Correct...your fanbase is a fricking disgrace to the SEC anyway. Why would we want to be associated with that behavior?
I'd rather just hate you and be done with it.
This post was edited on 12/2/12 at 9:33 pm
Posted on 12/2/12 at 9:33 pm to Sampson
LSU already has passed UT and is going to pass Auburn any year now. They already are our biggest rival.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 9:33 pm to Sampson
quote:
History must not be your thing
This. Apparently someone started watching college football yesterday.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 10:11 pm to Sampson
I think you guys are seriously underestimating my hatred of Tennessee.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 10:13 pm to 6thFairway
quote:
I think you guys are seriously underestimating my hatred of Tennessee.
Maybe so. But you'll have half a century for that hatred to cool off according to the OP.
Posted on 12/2/12 at 10:16 pm to Sampson
No, fifty years from now y'all me be The LSU.
Popular
Back to top


1





