Started By
Message
2014 A&M is looking like the 2013 offense + the 2012 defense
Posted on 9/26/14 at 11:15 pm
Posted on 9/26/14 at 11:15 pm
Through four games:
2012 A&M scored 48.3 points per game
2012 A&M allowed 11.8 points per game
Game 5: A&M 30, at Ole Miss 27
2013 A&M scored 50.5 points per game
2013 A&M allowed 30.3 points per game
Game 5: A&M 45, at Arkansas 33
2014 A&M scored 55.3 points per game
2014 A&M allowed 11.8 points per game
2012 A&M scored 48.3 points per game
2012 A&M allowed 11.8 points per game
Game 5: A&M 30, at Ole Miss 27
2013 A&M scored 50.5 points per game
2013 A&M allowed 30.3 points per game
Game 5: A&M 45, at Arkansas 33
2014 A&M scored 55.3 points per game
2014 A&M allowed 11.8 points per game
6
Posted on 9/26/14 at 11:17 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Lamar
Rice
SMU
Rice
SMU
Posted on 9/26/14 at 11:17 pm to WarCamEagle
Aren't you leaving someone out?
Posted on 9/26/14 at 11:18 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
Aren't you leaving someone out?
South Carolina
OFF: 52
DEF: 28
Looking like 2013 to me
Posted on 9/26/14 at 11:18 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
Through four games:
2012 A&M scored 48.3 points per game
2012 A&M allowed 11.8 points per game
Game 5: A&M 30, at Ole Miss 27
2013 A&M scored 50.5 points per game
2013 A&M allowed 30.3 points per game
Game 5: A&M 45, at Arkansas 33
2014 A&M scored 55.3 points per game
2014 A&M allowed 11.8 points per game
Way to early in the season to be hyping the Aggies.
Posted on 9/26/14 at 11:22 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
CGSC Lobotomy
Bow down weekend warrior!!!
Posted on 9/26/14 at 11:24 pm to TopHog1
quote:
Bow down weekend warrior!!!
Weekend warrior? Really? That's all you have? You can't even get me and TBird straight.
Here's a hint...one is a reservist who has been in since 2010, the other active since 2000.
Here's another hint. One has his class year in his username. (I feel like Alex Trebek in Celebrity Jeopardy here)
This post was edited on 9/26/14 at 11:26 pm
Posted on 9/26/14 at 11:30 pm to WarCamEagle
quote:
Looking like 2013 to me
South Carolina has put up 40 ppg since playing us.
Posted on 9/26/14 at 11:32 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
When arky drops 30+ on you will you still be saying that? 
Posted on 9/26/14 at 11:33 pm to bfpri
quote:
When arky drops 30+ on you will you still be saying that?
Louisiana Tech dropped 57 on the 2012 defense. We still won.
Teams tend to have bad games from time to time against weaker opponents with gimmick offenses.
This post was edited on 9/26/14 at 11:34 pm
Posted on 9/26/14 at 11:40 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
Teams tend to have bad games from time to time against weaker opponents with gimmick offenses.
That explains Bama-aTm 2012. Thanks.
Posted on 9/26/14 at 11:45 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
Teams tend to have bad games from time to time against weaker opponents with gimmick offenses.
Arkansas is anything but a gimmicky offense. Cmon bro, me thinks ur trying too hard here.
ATM should win on talent, recruiting ability, and program being in the same system for longer period, without all of this crap.
But there is a reason the game is played on the field. Sometimes... SOMETIMES>>>>
We shall see.
Posted on 9/26/14 at 11:49 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
2012 defense
So, shitty?
Posted on 9/26/14 at 11:54 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Usce has put up points since the first game but ECU while winning games seems to give up points. They gave up a lot against UNC in their win. And UGA fans were way too excited about beating a true freshman led QB in his first game of his career at home.
Long story short. Usce might just be putting up points due to playing bad defenses.
I don't doubt that the Aggies D is improved though. Just think we need a better sample size against decent competition to see how much
Long story short. Usce might just be putting up points due to playing bad defenses.
I don't doubt that the Aggies D is improved though. Just think we need a better sample size against decent competition to see how much
Posted on 9/27/14 at 12:02 am to CGSC Lobotomy
Hey that's a cool story bro 
Posted on 9/27/14 at 12:04 am to LittleRockHog501
quote:
Usce has put up points since the first game but ECU while winning games seems to give up points. They gave up a lot against UNC in their win. And UGA fans were way too excited about beating a true freshman led QB in his first game of his career at home. Long story short. Usce might just be putting up points due to playing bad defenses. I don't doubt that the Aggies D is improved though. Just think we need a better sample size against decent competition to see how much
East Carolina jumped out 28-0 in the first qtr if you bothered watching the game. They tried kill some clock and turned the ball over inside their own 20 more than once and gave up 2 garbage tds at the end of the game but don't take my word for it. They completely clobbered UNC and don't for get the won they also had over Va Tech. ECU jumped out to 17-0 only to allow the Hokies to comeback and make it a game late. Va Tech beat the Ohio st at the horseshoe if you didn't know
Posted on 9/27/14 at 12:15 am to CGSC Lobotomy
SMU (0-3):
128th in points allowed
128th in points for
110th in pass yards for
128th in rush yards for
Rice (0-3):
123rd in points allowed
96th in points for
Lamar (FCS):
aTm scored 14 points in the last 5 minutes of the game, including throwing on 4th down with 5 minutes left for a TD
Scar (3-1):
109th in points against
45th in points for
One key thing about your excellent Aggie defense is that you've face an FCS school, the 128th, 123rd, and 109th school in the land in points against. Oh and your great offense put under the average that Rice gives up per game.
128th in points allowed
128th in points for
110th in pass yards for
128th in rush yards for
Rice (0-3):
123rd in points allowed
96th in points for
Lamar (FCS):
aTm scored 14 points in the last 5 minutes of the game, including throwing on 4th down with 5 minutes left for a TD
Scar (3-1):
109th in points against
45th in points for
One key thing about your excellent Aggie defense is that you've face an FCS school, the 128th, 123rd, and 109th school in the land in points against. Oh and your great offense put under the average that Rice gives up per game.
Posted on 9/27/14 at 12:21 am to SuperK
I didn't say they weren't good or a fraud or that USCe should be ashamed of having a closer than expected game. I watched what they did to Unc. They put up video game numbers, but gave up points and yards as well.
In two of the past three over 400 yards of offense and 380+ in the other put up against them. I think it is fair to say that their defense is a little suspect. Great offensive production they have going on there though.
In two of the past three over 400 yards of offense and 380+ in the other put up against them. I think it is fair to say that their defense is a little suspect. Great offensive production they have going on there though.
Posted on 9/27/14 at 12:50 am to LittleRockHog501
We don't claim to have a championship defense. We have the pieces in the making to be very good at some point but right now we're just happy that in game 4 we're already light years ahead of where we were at game 4 in 2013. But the atrocity that we fielded on "D" last season still was enough to hose you down for a few possessions and our offense hasn't skipped a beat. So go ahead....don't take us seriously. We welcome that. If you don't agree with me just watch last year's game.... then watch a game this year. You're short bus stupid if you can't see the difference in our improvements on both sides of the ball.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News