Started By
Message
re: 2011 Alabama vs 2019 LSU
Posted on 3/31/20 at 9:38 pm to Godawgs4
Posted on 3/31/20 at 9:38 pm to Godawgs4
quote:
They got royally screwed by having to play a team for a second time
No one was "screwed". That was the system in place; Alabama was one of the two best teams in the country at the end of the regular season. Your opinion that 2011 LSU "would have destroyed OK State or any other team in a bowl game" proves that the BCS was correct in the pairing.
Posted on 3/31/20 at 9:45 pm to skrayper
Nope. LSU had already beat Bama on their home field. They had already proven they were better.
In CFB rematches don’t make sense at all.
Bama had already had their chance to beat LSU. They did not deserve another chance.
Same thing happened to LSU in 1959. They beat OM. Rematch in the Sugar Bowl. Little surprise that the score was 21-0. No surprise.
It was no brainer that Bama was going to win that game. Should have never been played.
Bama had already had their chance . They failed.
In CFB rematches don’t make sense at all.
Bama had already had their chance to beat LSU. They did not deserve another chance.
Same thing happened to LSU in 1959. They beat OM. Rematch in the Sugar Bowl. Little surprise that the score was 21-0. No surprise.
It was no brainer that Bama was going to win that game. Should have never been played.
Bama had already had their chance . They failed.
Posted on 3/31/20 at 9:47 pm to texag7
quote:
Hell 2012 Bama would smoke them like a fat blunt
Ok Daniel.
Posted on 3/31/20 at 9:50 pm to Godawgs4
quote:
They had already proven they were better.
In CFB rematches don’t make sense at all.
Rematches happen all the time in CFB. Conference championship games have often incorporated two teams who played each other in the regular season. No one has said that those games should be skipped because the two teams already played earlier in the season.
quote:
It was no brainer that Bama was going to win that game.
If that is your opinion, then it appears that you really think LSU shouldn't have been in the game.
The purpose of the BCS was to put the best two teams against each other. There were no caveats, no bonus criteria. LSU and Alabama met the set standards for being in the game.
If you dislike it, take it up with the athletic directors who agreed to the system. Like LSU's.
Posted on 3/31/20 at 9:59 pm to EarlyCuyler3
I don’t see one triggered fan here from either side
Posted on 3/31/20 at 10:12 pm to skrayper
13-1 > 12-1
1-1
LSU 2011 natty champs
1-1
LSU 2011 natty champs
Posted on 3/31/20 at 10:41 pm to The Silverback
Alabama's fat slow linebackers would be toast. They'd give up 35+ to LSU.
It was a much different game in the SEC just a short 8 years ago.
It was a much different game in the SEC just a short 8 years ago.
Posted on 3/31/20 at 11:05 pm to Eat Your Crow
Please, sweet baby Jesus, let the 2020 football season happen so LSU fans will STFU!
I’m waiting for Little Willie to tell me how the 2019 Tigas would curb stomp the ‘85 Chicago Bears.
I’m waiting for Little Willie to tell me how the 2019 Tigas would curb stomp the ‘85 Chicago Bears.
Posted on 4/1/20 at 8:30 am to phil4bama
Burrow would TORCH the 46 Defense.
Posted on 4/1/20 at 8:37 am to phil4bama
quote:
Please, sweet baby Jesus, let the 2020 football season happen so LSU fans will STFU
Pretty sure LSU fans will not shut up if LSU beats Bama again
Posted on 4/1/20 at 8:40 am to EarlyCuyler3
quote:
That was the beginning of 8 miserable years for the bayou bungles
I just looked it up and we went 77-26 over that period. Not amazing by any stretch but if that’s our miserable then I’ll take it
Posted on 4/1/20 at 8:43 am to The Silverback
I wish we had NCAA rosters to simulate to pass the time
Posted on 4/1/20 at 8:44 am to The Silverback
2019 LSU best team of all time>than any other team ever you dummy.
The in-depth analysts have done the analysis for you.
The in-depth analysts have done the analysis for you.
This post was edited on 4/1/20 at 8:45 am
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News