Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

2000 BCS Playoffs

Posted on 8/3/19 at 9:21 pm
Posted by Oklahomey
Bucksnort, TN
Member since Mar 2013
4984 posts
Posted on 8/3/19 at 9:21 pm
Again, not my rankings. Rankings based on final BCS standings. Matchups are based on standard seeding bracket matchups.

#1 Oklahoma vs. #8 Nebraska (rematch)
#4 Washington vs. #5 Virginia Tech
#3 Miami vs. #6 Oregon State
#2 Florida State vs. #7 Florida (rematch)

We know UF’s history on rematches with their familiar foe. Would Florida pull the upset?

Oklahoma vs. Washington would have been fun.

Miami may have been the most talented by the end of the year. Oklahoma dodged that monster!
Posted by boulwarejockstrap
"The Road Warrior"
Member since Nov 2017
791 posts
Posted on 8/3/19 at 9:24 pm to
Virginia tech sucks
Posted by EasternShoreTider
Fairhope, AL
Member since Oct 2018
988 posts
Posted on 8/3/19 at 9:37 pm to
What’s your point?
Posted by Oklahomey
Bucksnort, TN
Member since Mar 2013
4984 posts
Posted on 8/3/19 at 9:41 pm to
Posted 1998 and 1999 earlier. Just a fun topic to discuss.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 8/3/19 at 9:46 pm to
quote:

We know UF’s history on rematches with their familiar foe. Would Florida pull the upset?

Nope. They were clearly the better team and had already pounded us 30-7.
The SEC sucked that year.
This post was edited on 8/3/19 at 9:47 pm
Posted by MIZ_COU
I'm right here
Member since Oct 2013
13771 posts
Posted on 8/3/19 at 9:49 pm to
that he old
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79978 posts
Posted on 8/3/19 at 10:37 pm to
Miami should have been 3, Washington 2 and Florida State 4
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter