Started By
Message
re: arkies: Eureka Springs (UPDATE: snowing in yankeeland)
Posted on 5/2/13 at 12:19 pm to mograyback
Posted on 5/2/13 at 12:19 pm to mograyback
This weekends forecast:
Augusta, MO
51, 55, 60 w/ rain.
Eureka Springs, AR
44, 49, 60 w/ 60% chance of snow.
Should we revisit the discussion about the relevance of weather and how it relates to how much more southern you all are? Good thing the ball club is on the road this weekend, would hate to see all that chirping about our snowed out game backfire.
Augusta, MO
51, 55, 60 w/ rain.
Eureka Springs, AR
44, 49, 60 w/ 60% chance of snow.
Should we revisit the discussion about the relevance of weather and how it relates to how much more southern you all are? Good thing the ball club is on the road this weekend, would hate to see all that chirping about our snowed out game backfire.
2
Posted on 5/2/13 at 1:07 pm to mograyback
No chance of accumulation, your argument is invalid.
Posted on 5/2/13 at 1:21 pm to Stonehog
This guy says it's gonna snow, whether it melts or not isn't as significant as the fact that it's snowing in May in the great deep south that is Arkansas.
Posted on 5/2/13 at 7:03 pm to mograyback
quote:
Eureka Springs, AR
44, 49, 60 w/ 60% chance of snow.
Please send pics of the snow accumulation
TIA
Also, I know this will go over your head, but its worth a try
Augusta, MO (elev 561 ft)
Eureka Springs, AR (1260 ft)
Posted on 5/2/13 at 7:08 pm to Porker Face
quote:
Please send pics of the snow accumulation
What is this fixation on accumulation?? This is solely about one thing, that it is likely going to snow in May in the great southern state of Arkansas.
quote:
Also, I know this will go over your head, but its worth a try
Augusta, MO (elev 561 ft)
Eureka Springs, AR (1260 ft)
I don't get it.
Posted on 5/2/13 at 7:14 pm to mograyback
You don't understand the relationship between elevation and snow?
k.
And if it does snow, it will be the first time in recorded history that snow has fallen in the state of Arkansas in the month of May.
More of a climate change thing than a yankee thing.
k.
And if it does snow, it will be the first time in recorded history that snow has fallen in the state of Arkansas in the month of May.
More of a climate change thing than a yankee thing.
Posted on 5/2/13 at 7:21 pm to wmr
quote:
You don't understand the relationship between elevation and snow?
Your sarcasm meter: on-[off]
quote:
And if it does snow, it will be the first time in recorded history that snow has fallen in the state of Arkansas in the month of May.
More of a climate change thing than a yankee thing
So... If I remember correctly you all didn't really seem to care that our spring snow that cancelled ball games earlier this year was extremely abnormal.
Posted on 5/2/13 at 7:27 pm to mograyback
quote:
So... If I remember correctly you all didn't really seem to care that our spring snow that cancelled ball games earlier this year was extremely abnormal.
Error in logic: March snows are not "extremely abnormal" in Columbia
In fact, y'all average 2" in the month of March annually.
Posted on 5/2/13 at 7:33 pm to Porker Face
Weather thread on the Rant turns into a pissing contest between two midwestern states arguing over being more southern based on weather.
News at 11.
News at 11.
Posted on 5/2/13 at 7:34 pm to Porker Face
Further: a real statistical analysis (opposed to propaganda and data manipulation) would've used a Missouri city near Eureka Springs, rather than one 5 hours away.
Let's say, for example, Cassville, Mo:
Distance: 30 miles
Time: 43 minutes
Forecast: 38 degrees, 1-3" snow on Fri
48, 50% chance of snow on Sat
Assuming your resistance to acknowledge the import of accumulation, I will assume Eureka gets none.
Of course, an actual statistical analysis doesn't help your case, so that's one of many reasons one wasn't conducted
Let's say, for example, Cassville, Mo:
Distance: 30 miles
Time: 43 minutes
Forecast: 38 degrees, 1-3" snow on Fri
48, 50% chance of snow on Sat
quote:
Eureka Springs, AR
44, 49, 60 w/ 60% chance of snow.
Assuming your resistance to acknowledge the import of accumulation, I will assume Eureka gets none.
Of course, an actual statistical analysis doesn't help your case, so that's one of many reasons one wasn't conducted
Posted on 5/2/13 at 7:38 pm to Porker Face
quote:
Error in logic: March snows are not "extremely abnormal" in Columbia
In fact, y'all average 2" in the month of March annually.
I can assure you that it doesn't snow 2 inches every March, a March snowfall is rare. Remember that they are taking totals from decades ago before climate change.
This site seems to be going with 1.3 for the avg March snowfall LINK
And let's keep on track here, it's going to snow in Arkansas in May... that nonsense doesn't happen in the real south.
Posted on 5/2/13 at 7:38 pm to Mizzeaux
Not possible.
There's only one midwestern state represented on the rant.
Here's a hint which one it is:
There's only one midwestern state represented on the rant.
Here's a hint which one it is:
This post was edited on 5/2/13 at 7:39 pm
Posted on 5/2/13 at 7:39 pm to Porker Face
This retard (Porker) pulls out the weather stats again! Where ya at, Dale? We need you to link more weather maps and graphs to complete your Porker girlfriend's old as grandma's dusty vagina troll.
ETA: Nevermind, Dale. Your other girlfriend, Weemer, linked the graphs.
Gotta love the Graph Girls Crew
This post was edited on 5/2/13 at 7:44 pm
Posted on 5/2/13 at 7:40 pm to Mizzeaux
quote:
Weather thread on the Rant turns into a pissing contest between two midwestern states arguing over being more southern based on weather.
News at 11.
How the Cubs doin?
Posted on 5/2/13 at 7:44 pm to Porker Face
quote:
Further: a real statistical analysis (opposed to propaganda and data manipulation) would've used a Missouri city near Eureka Springs, rather than one 5 hours away.
Let's say, for example, Cassville, Mo:
Just comparing it to where I live, man.. Of course a city right across the border is going to have similar weather.
quote:
Assuming your resistance to acknowledge the import of accumulation, I will assume Eureka gets none.
Of course, an actual statistical analysis doesn't help your case, so that's one of many reasons one wasn't conducted
I'm going to assume you had an anal plug in at the time you wrote this post.
This post was edited on 5/2/13 at 7:45 pm
Posted on 5/2/13 at 7:45 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
This retard (Porker) pulls out the weather stats again!
Umm, look up the page at who started this discussion
Thread history is your friend in the constant battle of not looking like a dumbass
Posted on 5/2/13 at 7:47 pm to Porker Face
quote:
Umm, look up the page at who started this discussion
Thread history is your friend in the constant battle of not looking like a dumbass
It's not my fault you all can't take a simple chirp... it's forecasted to snow in your fine southern state this weekend, just take it on the chin and move on.
Posted on 5/2/13 at 7:47 pm to mograyback
quote:quote:
Assuming your resistance to acknowledge the import of accumulation, I will assume Eureka gets none.
Of course, an actual statistical analysis doesn't help your case, so that's one of many reasons one wasn't conducted
I'm going to assume you had an anal plug in at the time you wrote this post
OK
I don't see any problems?
Posted on 5/2/13 at 7:48 pm to Porker Face
Nah, I don't look like a dumbass.
Keep on living the rant dream, bro.
And don't forget to keep fresh batteries in your Troll and Derail Thread Alarm. Otherwise, what would we do in your absence? Oh my God!!!
Keep on living the rant dream, bro.
And don't forget to keep fresh batteries in your Troll and Derail Thread Alarm. Otherwise, what would we do in your absence? Oh my God!!!
This post was edited on 5/2/13 at 7:50 pm
Posted on 5/2/13 at 7:52 pm to mizzoukills
Porker,
We need more maps and graphs, pronto! Fetch, dog...
We need more maps and graphs, pronto! Fetch, dog...
This post was edited on 5/2/13 at 7:53 pm
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News