Started By
Message

Mike Elko
Posted on 10/26/25 at 8:08 pm
Posted on 10/26/25 at 8:08 pm
Coach of the year. Texas A&M looks better than they have since the RC Slocum days. The early Sumlin years with Johnny Football were fun, but this is a very complete team.
Posted on 10/26/25 at 8:11 pm to DyeHardDylan
If Elko didn’t look like a goober he’d be rightly viewed as elite.
If programs used moneyball paradigms to hire coaches instead of big money boosters he would’ve gotten a shot at a big job long before A&M for what he did at Duke.
If programs used moneyball paradigms to hire coaches instead of big money boosters he would’ve gotten a shot at a big job long before A&M for what he did at Duke.
Posted on 10/26/25 at 8:12 pm to tide06
Who cares what he looks like you weirdo?
Posted on 10/26/25 at 8:13 pm to tide06
quote:
If Elko didn’t look like a goober he’d be rightly viewed as elite.
If he keeps winning, I don't care if he looks like Mark Mangino.
Posted on 10/26/25 at 8:14 pm to Uga Alum
quote:
Who cares what he looks like you weirdo?
All the programs that didn’t hire him earlier apparently.
Posted on 10/26/25 at 8:15 pm to tide06
Right, because that was the reason.
Posted on 10/26/25 at 8:15 pm to DyeHardDylan
Looking like a brilliant hire by A&M, unfortunately
Posted on 10/26/25 at 8:15 pm to ColoradoElkHerd
quote:
If he keeps winning, I don't care if he looks like Mark Mangino.
Exactly.
Fat coaches and goofy coaches like Drink at Mizzou get undervalued for non football reasons.
LSU fans are doing it right now talking about Drinkwitz not being a good fit. The guy just wins with less.
Posted on 10/26/25 at 8:17 pm to Uga Alum
quote:
Right, because that was the reason.
Then what was the reason he sat at Duke for years winning 8-9 games a year after crushing it at A&M as a coordinator instead of getting a bigger offer?
Posted on 10/26/25 at 8:18 pm to tide06
quote:
quote:
Who cares what he looks like you weirdo?
All the programs that didn’t hire him earlier apparently.
He coached at Duke for all of 2 years before coming to A&M. WTF are you even talking about?
BTW, Elko is also an Ivy League graduate. It's not like schools feared he would embarrass them.
Posted on 10/26/25 at 8:19 pm to tide06
quote:
Then what was the reason he sat at Duke for years
2 years
Posted on 10/26/25 at 8:22 pm to GamerAg
My point is that coaches get overlooked for non football reasons.
A&M knew his value because he’d already coached there.
A&M knew his value because he’d already coached there.
Posted on 10/26/25 at 8:23 pm to DyeHardDylan
He would get my vote.
Posted on 10/26/25 at 8:30 pm to tide06
Alabama fan making comments on what someone looks like.
Oh the irony.
Oh the irony.
Posted on 10/26/25 at 8:35 pm to tide06
quote:
Fat coaches and goofy coaches like Drink at Mizzou get undervalued for non football reasons.
LSU fans are doing it right now talking about Drinkwitz not being a good fit. The guy just wins with less.
Drinkwitz is meh.
He beats up on weak schedules and loses the big games. We could've just kept BK and got that.
Posted on 10/26/25 at 8:38 pm to tide06
quote:
If Elko didn’t look like a goober he’d be rightly viewed as elite.
Xs & Os > “looks”
But he looks pretty “elite” right now. Carry on with your evaluation of relevant coaching variables though.
Posted on 10/26/25 at 8:39 pm to Capn_Bevo
quote:
Looking like a brilliant hire by A&M, unfortunately
100%. Great hire.
A&M is very fortunate Stoops turned them down. Not getting your first choice sometimes works out way better. Just ask Alabama. In 2007 Rich Rod turned them down so they had to “settle” on Nick Saban. (Sarcasm on the settle Bama fans).
Posted on 10/26/25 at 8:43 pm to Tammany Tom
A&M turned Stoops down
Posted on 10/26/25 at 8:51 pm to Tammany Tom
quote:
A&M is very fortunate Stoops turned them down.

Popular
Back to top

3







