Started By
Message

S. Carolina to consider Fair Pay to Play bill

Posted on 9/13/19 at 5:21 pm
Posted by TidalSurge1
Ft Walton Beach
Member since Sep 2016
36467 posts
Posted on 9/13/19 at 5:21 pm
S. Carolina to consider Fair Pay to Play bill (ESPN)
quote:

Two South Carolina legislators are planning to be next in a recent movement of lawmakers attempting to give college athletes more opportunities to earn money while in school...
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26952 posts
Posted on 9/13/19 at 5:24 pm to
"Kimpson and Bamberg have floated similar ideas in the past, but those did not generate enough interest to require a vote."
Posted by Lordofwrath88
Tuscaloosa
Member since Oct 2012
6853 posts
Posted on 9/13/19 at 7:23 pm to
Just imagining how cool it would be to walk into the UA Book store and see aisles of player jerseys and knowing that a cut of my purchase is going right to them.
Posted by FairhopeTider
Fairhope, Alabama
Member since May 2012
20750 posts
Posted on 9/13/19 at 11:27 pm to
Sounds like fantasy land.

Who gets a cut of the #2 jersey? Henry? Hurts? Surtain? Do they get it for perpetuity? Can the university protect it’s branding if an athlete deals with some sketchy businesses? Since the athletes are now profiting off of their exposure from the University, can the University enforce a non-compete clause? Is there a cap allowed to prevent this from becoming an open bidding war for players?

It’s just not as easy as saying “They should get some cash for their likeness.”
This post was edited on 9/13/19 at 11:56 pm
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
20449 posts
Posted on 9/13/19 at 11:58 pm to
quote:

Just imagining how cool it would be to walk into the UA Book store and see aisles of player jerseys and knowing that a cut of my purchase is going to about three guys and the rest of the team can just frick themselves




FIFY
Posted by BamaDude06
GOATville20
Member since Jan 2007
3475 posts
Posted on 9/14/19 at 12:41 am to
quote:

Who gets a cut of the #2 jersey? Henry? Hurts? Surtain?


That would have to be worked out, but I imagine a blank #2 would be licensed to the player current;y wearing it while a #2 with an actual name would always go to that player.
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 9/14/19 at 5:08 am to
I can't imagine being against these bills.
Posted by phil4bama
Emerald Coast of PCB
Member since Jul 2011
11454 posts
Posted on 9/14/19 at 7:15 am to
Are you fricking crazy? I can’t imagine being FOR these bills!!
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 9/14/19 at 7:20 am to
quote:

Are you fricking crazy? I can’t imagine being FOR these bills!!

I'm going to assume that this is sarcasm.
Posted by BamaBo7
Madison,MS
Member since Jan 2017
5686 posts
Posted on 9/14/19 at 7:26 am to
You know what they say about when you assume...
Posted by bamameister
Right here, right now
Member since May 2016
13849 posts
Posted on 9/14/19 at 7:40 am to
NCAA wouldn't come close to regulating all the greed and selfishness associated with all those grubby hands in this cookie jar. And they know it.
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26952 posts
Posted on 9/14/19 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

Just imagining how cool it would be to walk into the UA Book store and see aisles of player jerseys and knowing that a cut of my purchase is going right to them.


Bama stops that bullshite by taking the names off the back.

By the time Musso, Nathan, and, Ingram get their cut from 22, Najee won't see a dime.

Seriously though...take the names off and the players don't get jack shite.
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26952 posts
Posted on 9/14/19 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

That would have to be worked out, but I imagine a blank #2 would be licensed to the player current;y wearing it while a #2 with an actual name would always go to that player.


This is stupid.

What would give Najee the rights to a 22 with no name on it? Musso sold more 22s than Najee ever will.

Player doesn't get shite without his name on it.
Posted by John Milner
Member since Jan 2015
6448 posts
Posted on 9/14/19 at 2:11 pm to
quote:


What would give Najee the rights to a 22 with no name on it? Musso sold more 22s than Najee ever will.

Player doesn't get shite without his name on it.


In any event, it wouldn't be only apparel. It might be tv, print, or www ads for whatever product.
Posted by John Milner
Member since Jan 2015
6448 posts
Posted on 9/14/19 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

NCAA wouldn't come close to regulating all the greed and selfishness associated with all those grubby hands in this cookie jar. And they know it.




They also would probably not win a court case.

This article LINK indicates changes may come sooner than later

"The association is open to updating its rules to better fit the 21st century, according to NCAA Board of Governors Chair Michael Drake, but wants those changes to be made on a national scale rather than state by state.

'We need to look at [NIL rules] carefully. My understanding broadly of name, image and likeness and the implications of those restrictions has changed really over the last several years and continues to evolve. We need to make sure our rules and guidelines evolve forward. We're not the association of the 20th century. We need to make sure we have 21st century rules.'

Drake said a national change is much more desirable for the NCAA."
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26952 posts
Posted on 9/14/19 at 2:39 pm to
quote:


What would give Najee the rights to a 22 with no name on it? Musso sold more 22s than Najee ever will.

Player doesn't get shite without his name on it.


In any event, it wouldn't be only apparel. It might be tv, print, or www ads for whatever product.


I was replying specifically to the stupid comment about jerseys.

And that was not even considering the very obvious Title IX violation when the book store at Ferguson Center doesn't stock softball and women's basketball jerseys, women's swimsuits, etc, etc.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50230 posts
Posted on 9/14/19 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

I can’t imagine being FOR these bills!!
Posted by mikeboss550
Member since Apr 2013
10670 posts
Posted on 9/15/19 at 3:16 am to
I could see it being all atletic wear gear sold at the bookstore being allocated between athletes, not to a certain player. Then the player can capitalize on his it her likeness or "celebrity" in other ways to line the pockets.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
23834 posts
Posted on 9/15/19 at 7:37 am to
Posted by Lordofwrath88
Tuscaloosa
Member since Oct 2012
6853 posts
Posted on 9/15/19 at 6:55 pm to
quote:

Who gets a cut of the #2 jersey?


Is this a trick question? Whoever's NAME is on the jersey.


No one get anything for a blank number.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter