- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This is NOT a parody. A real life man posted this
Posted on 5/2/24 at 9:35 am to Prominentwon
Posted on 5/2/24 at 9:35 am to Prominentwon
You might want to read what Trump just said to Time magazine about red states being given the power to track a woman's pregnancy to ensure she doesn't get an abortion, which would be criminal even beyond state borders.
"When asked if he would veto a bill that would impose a federal ban, he reiterated “it’s about states rights” and said “there will never be that chance” because Republicans, even if they take back the Senate in November, would not have the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster and bring the bill to a vote.
Trump repeated his catchall states-rights response when asked if states should monitor women’s pregnancies so the government would know if they had an abortion."
AP article
"When asked if he would veto a bill that would impose a federal ban, he reiterated “it’s about states rights” and said “there will never be that chance” because Republicans, even if they take back the Senate in November, would not have the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster and bring the bill to a vote.
Trump repeated his catchall states-rights response when asked if states should monitor women’s pregnancies so the government would know if they had an abortion."
AP article
This post was edited on 5/2/24 at 9:47 am
8
Posted on 5/2/24 at 9:36 am to mmmmmbeeer
quote:
You might want to read what Trump just said to Time magazine about red states being given the power to track a woman's pregnancy to ensure she doesn't get an abortion, which would be criminal even beyond state borders.
Ah well, mmmmmmcreampie has spoken. Pack it up boys.
Posted on 5/2/24 at 9:37 am to mmmmmbeeer
What’s y’all’s obsession with killing babies?
Posted on 5/2/24 at 10:18 am to mmmmmbeeer
quote:
Women and soy men eat it up
quote:
mmmmmbeeer
Like moths to a flame
Posted on 5/2/24 at 10:43 am to mmmmmbeeer
The AP article was about people's opinions of what Trump means when he says " It's about states rights." In other words, he was saying it was not the a federal decision.
[quote]Trump repeated his catchall states-rights response when asked if states should monitor women’s pregnancies so the government would know if they had an abortion."[/quote]
This statement mmmmbeer just had to post , is just a 'gotcha' question that was asked to Trump, and he just said "states' rights". It is then written to look like Trump actually said the question being asked.
Sad
[quote]Trump repeated his catchall states-rights response when asked if states should monitor women’s pregnancies so the government would know if they had an abortion."[/quote]
This statement mmmmbeer just had to post , is just a 'gotcha' question that was asked to Trump, and he just said "states' rights". It is then written to look like Trump actually said the question being asked.
Sad
Posted on 5/2/24 at 11:11 am to mmmmmbeeer
No one gives a frick what you Georgians think.
Posted on 5/2/24 at 11:23 am to mmmmmbeeer
quote:
You might want to read what Trump just said to Time magazine about red states being given the power to track a woman's pregnancy to ensure she doesn't get an abortion, which would be criminal even beyond state borders.
"When asked if he would veto a bill that would impose a federal ban, he reiterated “it’s about states rights” and said “there will never be that chance” because Republicans, even if they take back the Senate in November, would not have the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster and bring the bill to a vote.
Trump repeated his catchall states-rights response when asked if states should monitor women’s pregnancies so the government would know if they had an abortion."
what aspect am i supposed to be upset about? that Trump said that? that he repeated it? that he’ll let the state’s decide?
i know all 3 have you pissing in your pants, but for the rest of us, why should we care?
Posted on 5/2/24 at 11:27 am to mmmmmbeeer
quote:
"When asked if he would veto a bill that would impose a federal ban, he reiterated “it’s about states rights”
You liberals really hate states rights but sure do love killing babies
Posted on 5/2/24 at 1:23 pm to mmmmmbeeer
quote:
Trump repeated his catchall states-rights response when asked if states should monitor women’s pregnancies so the government would know if they had an abortion."
He is absolutely correct. Nobody in Washington should be discussing or pushing their viewpoint on either side. It is a states rights issue. That was the whole reasoning used for overturning Roe.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News