Started By
Message
re: Regarding the whole Bruce Pearl/Nate Oats comparison
Posted on 5/1/24 at 2:19 pm to Govt Tide
Posted on 5/1/24 at 2:19 pm to Govt Tide
Bad take. You can't compare the 2-3 because they are incomparable. Auburn was in farrrrr worse shape than UA when Pearl took over. Oats had it bad but not as bad as BP. What Pearl has done considering where the program was before him, is unreal. Both are great. Find it funny as soon as UA tastes success again they want to turn into a pecker measuring contest. Unreal fan base.
2
Posted on 5/1/24 at 2:22 pm to ihateidiots18
Oats inherited a roster of 4 and 5 stars. He inherited the likes of Herb Jones, Shackleford and so on. He is also Nike and the state school.
He had it extremely easy if compared to Pearl.
He had it extremely easy if compared to Pearl.
Posted on 5/1/24 at 4:17 pm to ihateidiots18
quote:
Auburn was in farrrrr worse shape than UA when Pearl took over
What was the better program when CNO was hired
In April 2019, if someone claimed that Oats would outperform Pearl over the next 5 years, he would have been laughed off the board
This post was edited on 5/1/24 at 4:24 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News