Started By
Message
Grade the team at the halfway mark
Posted on 10/11/16 at 8:53 am
Posted on 10/11/16 at 8:53 am
Group-by-group
QB: C+
RB: A-
WR: D
TE: C+
OL: C+
DL: B+
LB: B+
DB: C
K: F
Coaches: B-
Overall: C+
QB: C+
RB: A-
WR: D
TE: C+
OL: C+
DL: B+
LB: B+
DB: C
K: F
Coaches: B-
Overall: C+
Posted on 10/11/16 at 8:58 am to BranchDawg
Largely agree with you. Though I think your QB rating is correct if you do not factor in he is a true freshman playing at a vastly higher level...Hurts at least has amazing depth all around him.
Posted on 10/11/16 at 9:02 am to BranchDawg
Offense: C+
Defense: B-
Sp Teams: D-
Coaching: C+
Overall: C+
about what I expected this time of year. We are a fluke ending away from controlling our own destiny in the SEC. Could end 10-2 with our schedule remaining or 8-4.
Defense: B-
Sp Teams: D-
Coaching: C+
Overall: C+
about what I expected this time of year. We are a fluke ending away from controlling our own destiny in the SEC. Could end 10-2 with our schedule remaining or 8-4.
Posted on 10/11/16 at 9:05 am to BranchDawg
QB C
RB B
WR D
OL C
DL C+
LB C+
DB D+
Special Teams D-
Coaches C-
RB B
WR D
OL C
DL C+
LB C+
DB D+
Special Teams D-
Coaches C-
This post was edited on 10/11/16 at 9:06 am
Posted on 10/11/16 at 9:08 am to lewis and herschel
quote:
Largely agree with you. Though I think your QB rating is correct if you do not factor in he is a true freshman playing at a vastly higher level...Hurts at least has amazing depth all around him.
My ratings take nothing into consideration except how they have performed. I would expect a hot shot, freshman QB to play at a C level, and that is what I gave him, because i think he has met expectations. In some ways, he has actually exceeded my expectations, and in some ways he has not....so I gave Eason a C.
Posted on 10/11/16 at 10:21 am to DawgsLife
So you think we average out around C? You think we are average to slightly below average around the country? You think we are the 60-75th ranked team? I would rate them in the context of the other teams, I understand you didn't though those questions are rhetorical.
Posted on 10/11/16 at 10:46 am to td01241
quote:
So you think we average out around C? You think we are average to slightly below average around the country? You think we are the 60-75th ranked team? I would rate them in the context of the other teams, I understand you didn't though those questions are rhetorical.
I have no problem with you asking questions, or disagreeing with my assessment.
No, I think we are better than 60-75 in the country. However, i also think there are more "C" teams than "A" or "B" teams. I would place about 10 "A" teams, 15 "B" teams, and probably 50 or so "C" teams.
I really didn't look at the other posters grades until you asked your questions, and it appears as if they agree with me, although they might think our team is a little better than I do.
When you look at our performance at Nicholls, Ole Miss, Missouri and South Carolina we are a very ordinary team, at best. We looked ok against North Carolina and looked pretty darn good against Tennessee.
There have been times when we looked very disorganized, and ill prepared. Time clock management has been horrendous. Yeah. I would say an average team.
Posted on 10/11/16 at 11:03 am to BranchDawg
I expected two losses at this point in the season and that's where they are.
Team Grade C+
Defense B-
Offense C
ST D
Team Grade C+
Defense B-
Offense C
ST D
Posted on 10/11/16 at 12:21 pm to BranchDawg
Offense: B-
QB: B
RB: A+
WR: F
TE: B-
OL: C+
Defense: B
DL: B-
LB: B
DB: B
Special Teams: F
K: F
P: F
Coaching: B-
Overall: B-
Biggest issues on this years team in my opinion have been the WRs, punter, kicker, and youth at QB. I would have listed our OLine but they have really come together the past couple of weeks and could be a strength by the end of the year.
QB: B
RB: A+
WR: F
TE: B-
OL: C+
Defense: B
DL: B-
LB: B
DB: B
Special Teams: F
K: F
P: F
Coaching: B-
Overall: B-
Biggest issues on this years team in my opinion have been the WRs, punter, kicker, and youth at QB. I would have listed our OLine but they have really come together the past couple of weeks and could be a strength by the end of the year.
This post was edited on 10/11/16 at 12:23 pm
Posted on 10/11/16 at 2:24 pm to BranchDawg
Pretty much agree with your grades. We are a very average team overall. But the weakness in the kicking game/special teams might well cost this team an extra loss this season.
Posted on 10/11/16 at 2:55 pm to BranchDawg
Offense: C
Defense: B-
Sp Teams: F
Coaching: B-
Overall: C
Defense: B-
Sp Teams: F
Coaching: B-
Overall: C
Posted on 10/11/16 at 2:55 pm to BranchDawg
QB:
RB:
WR:
TE:
OL:
DL:
LB:
DB:
K:
Coaches:
Overall:
RB:
WR:
TE:
OL:
DL:
LB:
DB:
K:
Coaches:
Overall:
Posted on 10/11/16 at 3:14 pm to Fats
This guy read my mind. Couldn't agree more and I think there's little doubt that both ST and WR deserve big ole F's.
Give us a reliable place kicker and two above-average WRs and I think we could be undefeated right now with the possible exception of a loss to OM (missed FGs robbed any and all momentum in that game).
Give us a reliable place kicker and two above-average WRs and I think we could be undefeated right now with the possible exception of a loss to OM (missed FGs robbed any and all momentum in that game).
Posted on 10/11/16 at 6:01 pm to BranchDawg
big picture W/L wise: B+
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News