Started By
Message
re: Fromm vs Eason
Posted on 4/24/17 at 9:49 am to GoldenDawg
Posted on 4/24/17 at 9:49 am to GoldenDawg
So tight coverage causes you to throw the ball 3 feet over a receivers head, in the dirt or 5 yds ahead of them?
Posted on 4/24/17 at 9:56 am to SquatchDawg
quote:
So tight coverage causes you to throw the ball 3 feet over a receivers head, in the dirt or 5 yds ahead of them?
It can
Posted on 4/24/17 at 10:11 am to FaCubeItches
quote:
Honest question: if Fromm is the better player, why would you hope the lesser player starts?
IMO, Eason can simply make some throws Fromm can't. Despite Fromm's polish, Eason's potential is still early first round.
Posted on 4/24/17 at 10:50 am to Dick Leverage
quote:
He would have started for every metro school save 2 or 3
Please, tell us what 2 or 3 metro ATL schools the Rivals Junior of the year, All American, and Gatorade Player of the Year would have ridden the bench.
Posted on 4/24/17 at 10:50 am to Dick Leverage
[quote]. He would have started for every metro school save 2 or 3. quote]
Can you name them?
Can you name them?
Posted on 4/24/17 at 10:58 am to Crowknowsbest
quote:
It can
So those throws and his sub 50 completion rate were Eason wisely missing the target to avoid an interception. Got it.
Posted on 4/24/17 at 11:16 am to SquatchDawg
quote:
So those throws and his sub 50 completion rate were Eason wisely missing the target to avoid an interception. Got it.
That's not what I said.
Posted on 4/24/17 at 11:26 am to Crowknowsbest
This argument is truly based on parameters that are ridiculously skewed.
The Red and Black game is not balanced at all:
First off, our first string Defense is much better then our second string, especially in the secondary.
Secondly, No chubb or Michel, which when in the I formation would change ANY defenses' formation. You must respect them, and with out them, its much easier to play defense.
Thirdly, the playbook was so vanilla the shite needed sprinkles. It was about as lame as a game plan as you can get, and was on purpose.
Did Eason make some bad throws? Yes, he did, in particular the dump to Chubb over the middle where he threw it behind him. He has got to fricking work on his accuracy, and I don't think there is any argument there...however, Fromm had a lot of advantages in this game. He made some pretty throws though and seemed more at home in the pocket. I also didn't see much pressure on him, unlike Eason, who was under duress a lot.
The oline...thats a whole diff discussion as I think ti will continue to cause us problems this year, but comparing these two this early is just stupid. Let's see how Eason does when its balls to the walls with the best RB duo in the country toting the rock against worse defenses (m make no mistake, ours will be a top 10 d this year, imo) before we start worshipping Fromm.
My 2 cents
The Red and Black game is not balanced at all:
First off, our first string Defense is much better then our second string, especially in the secondary.
Secondly, No chubb or Michel, which when in the I formation would change ANY defenses' formation. You must respect them, and with out them, its much easier to play defense.
Thirdly, the playbook was so vanilla the shite needed sprinkles. It was about as lame as a game plan as you can get, and was on purpose.
Did Eason make some bad throws? Yes, he did, in particular the dump to Chubb over the middle where he threw it behind him. He has got to fricking work on his accuracy, and I don't think there is any argument there...however, Fromm had a lot of advantages in this game. He made some pretty throws though and seemed more at home in the pocket. I also didn't see much pressure on him, unlike Eason, who was under duress a lot.
The oline...thats a whole diff discussion as I think ti will continue to cause us problems this year, but comparing these two this early is just stupid. Let's see how Eason does when its balls to the walls with the best RB duo in the country toting the rock against worse defenses (m make no mistake, ours will be a top 10 d this year, imo) before we start worshipping Fromm.
My 2 cents
Posted on 4/24/17 at 12:20 pm to MeatCleaverWeaver
Lawrence and Hockman would have been two that he would have been in stiff competition with. He would likely not have received any of those national awards if he played in Gwinnett, Fulton, or Cobb. All state.... yes. Best in the nation....no. He would have been almost identical to Hockman. Righty vs lefty is the only difference in the two.
Posted on 4/24/17 at 12:29 pm to Sandwich
quote:
The Red and Black game is not balanced at all:
Fromm played against a secondary that had one player on scholarship
Posted on 4/24/17 at 12:38 pm to DawgCountry
Can't take away from Fromm for executing against the competition that he faced, but it wasn't an equal playing field between him and Eason.
Posted on 4/24/17 at 12:38 pm to Dick Leverage
quote:
Righty vs lefty is the only difference in the two.
That, about 4 inches, and a good bit of arm strength.
Posted on 4/24/17 at 1:16 pm to Crowknowsbest
Who cares if Eason can simply make throws Fromm can't. Anyone here think Tom Brady has a better arm than Eason?
Timing and accuracy are better than arm talent. I hope I'm wrong, but I predicted Eason might be the next Christian Hackenberg a while ago on this board. Let's see if he steps up this season because the leash might not be so long this time around.
Timing and accuracy are better than arm talent. I hope I'm wrong, but I predicted Eason might be the next Christian Hackenberg a while ago on this board. Let's see if he steps up this season because the leash might not be so long this time around.
Posted on 4/24/17 at 2:04 pm to grey
quote:
IMO, Eason can simply make some throws Fromm can't
Eason regularly misses open receivers ten yards away. Being unable to make the easy passes is a fast ticket to the bench.
Posted on 4/24/17 at 2:19 pm to jodeaux
quote:
I predicted Eason might be the next Christian Hackenberg a while ago on this board.
amazing what you can deduce by nothing more than a guy's true freshman season
Posted on 4/24/17 at 2:47 pm to WG_Dawg
I would guess none of his prognostications have ever been correct so this may be a great sign
Posted on 4/24/17 at 3:45 pm to SquatchDawg
quote:
I think this is the year that we'll see if Eason is the second coming of Matt Stafford or is he another highly rated HS kid that just can't pull it all together.
When did stafford become stafford? His junior season, so why not give Eason until his junior season as well?
Posted on 4/24/17 at 3:53 pm to SquatchDawg
quote:
I think this is the year that we'll see if Eason is the second coming of Matt Stafford
Eason is light years better than stafford in pretty much every conceivable category at the same point in both of their careers.
Posted on 4/24/17 at 3:55 pm to Whiznot
quote:
Eason regularly misses open receivers ten yards away. Being unable to make the easy passes is a fast ticket to the bench.
I did not see this on a regular basis. He missed some deep throws, and in fact, at times looked awful on the deep throws. however, I don't recall him missing a lot of 10 yard throws.
Timing needs work and accuracy. but he is still very, very young, and I think we will see big strides this year.
Posted on 4/24/17 at 3:55 pm to WG_Dawg
Eason didn't make as many bad decisions with the ball as Stafford his freshman year. That's about it.
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News