Started By
Message

A question for coaches or those that played at the next level.

Posted on 7/11/17 at 11:22 am
Posted by RhodeDawg
Delete my account
Member since Jun 2016
4450 posts
Posted on 7/11/17 at 11:22 am
This is beyond my area of expertise:

I remember a short time that CMR used both DJ Shockley and David Greene at the same time (pretty sure those were the 2 QBs, could be wrong).

My question is:
Assuming that Fields commits, we would have a pro- style QB in Eason and a DT in Fields.
Is it feasible to "train" the Oline and other offensive players to execute a RPO type offense when Fields is in and a more typical UGA pro- style i back attack when Fields isn't in?

Or is that not really possible because of blocking schemes, etc? In other words, is that just too much to expect from the overall offense?
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
44681 posts
Posted on 7/11/17 at 11:27 am to
quote:

A question for coaches or those that played at the next level


I don't fit this category, but I hate juggling QBs. If one gets hot, let him run with it.
Posted by RhodeDawg
Delete my account
Member since Jun 2016
4450 posts
Posted on 7/11/17 at 11:33 am to
I hear you. I think that's how CMR played the 2 of them actually.

But I'm just wondering with 2 different style QBs, hypothetically, if that would simply be asking too much of the offense.
Posted by DoubleDawg22
Member since Dec 2016
1572 posts
Posted on 7/11/17 at 11:35 am to
You don't have to have a runner to run RPO's. It's just a route with a running play and if the defense over Pursues the run game you throw it to the vacated space.

RPO's are designed to keep the defense honest and to slow their pursuit of the football down.

A DT QB helps when plays breakdown and they keep backside pursuit honest and make the defense play less aggressively. The schemes don't change much at all with a DT-QB. It's kinda hard to explain without a picture or video.
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
25871 posts
Posted on 7/11/17 at 11:46 am to
quote:

You don't have to have a runner to run RPO's.

This
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
3008 posts
Posted on 7/11/17 at 11:50 am to
If the officials would stop OL from blocking downfield on pass plays, it would slow down this surge toward mobile quarterbacks and RPO. Offensive coaches have found a way to "cheat", by taking away the defense's ability to key on whether the OL is run blocking or pass blocking. Urban Meyer kicked this trend into high gear when he used it to win a couple of championships at Florida with a mediocre quarterback, and it's made the game less interesting, to me at least.
Posted by RhodeDawg
Delete my account
Member since Jun 2016
4450 posts
Posted on 7/11/17 at 11:50 am to
My understanding is that the RPO has 3 options though:
QB reads a DE, for example then

A) will hand off to a back
B) pull out the handoff and pass
Or
C) keep it and run the ball himself

Seems to me a pro-style QB wouldn't really have that 3rd option.
Am I wrong?
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
25871 posts
Posted on 7/11/17 at 11:54 am to
quote:

Seems to me a pro-style QB wouldn't really have that 3rd option.
Am I wrong?

No, but you don't really need the third option usually. It's not that effective.

It's like the zone read, except instead of pulling it and running, the QB flips it out quick to the WR.

It's so hard to defend because that gets the ball outside a lot quicker than the QB run does.
Posted by RhodeDawg
Delete my account
Member since Jun 2016
4450 posts
Posted on 7/11/17 at 11:54 am to
I guess my real question is:

Does the offensive line have to learn a new blocking scheme to run a RPO, or can they basically still run a typical pro set?
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
25871 posts
Posted on 7/11/17 at 11:55 am to
quote:

If the officials would stop OL from blocking downfield on pass plays, it would slow down this surge toward mobile quarterbacks and RPO. Offensive coaches have found a way to "cheat", by taking away the defense's ability to key on whether the OL is run blocking or pass blocking. Urban Meyer kicked this trend into high gear when he used it to win a couple of championships at Florida with a mediocre quarterback, and it's made the game less interesting, to me at least.

The NFL lineman downfield rule is much better.
Posted by RhodeDawg
Delete my account
Member since Jun 2016
4450 posts
Posted on 7/11/17 at 11:55 am to
Gotcha.
So that would be his 3rd option...
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
25871 posts
Posted on 7/11/17 at 11:56 am to
quote:

Does the offensive line have to learn a new blocking scheme to run a RPO, or can they basically still run a typical pro set?

I think they basically just run block for the hand-off. College rules make it so that they aren't downfield by the time the QB gets the pass off.
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
63831 posts
Posted on 7/11/17 at 11:58 am to
If you've got two quarterbacks, you don't have one.
Posted by RhodeDawg
Delete my account
Member since Jun 2016
4450 posts
Posted on 7/11/17 at 12:01 pm to
Yeah, you need a real leader on the field so I get that too.

I'm just fantasizing thinking about defenses being on their heels for a change instead of loading the fricking box expecting us to run every play.
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
3008 posts
Posted on 7/11/17 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

The NFL lineman downfield rule is much better.


I don't watch much NFL anymore, but they did seem to enforce it more consistently in the past. In college, it seems like the officials enforce it sporadically and maybe even selectively. Georgia seems to get rigorous enforcement because our OL generally stay home on pass plays, so it's more noticeable when they drift upfield. But some of the spread teams push the envelope multiple times a game but don't get penalized any more for it.
Posted by crispyUGA
Upstate SC
Member since Feb 2011
15919 posts
Posted on 7/11/17 at 12:42 pm to
We need to be running RPO's now.

Generally speaking, you'd add plays to your playbook for a certain personnel grouping. It could limit what you can do with that package, but asking your offensive line to totally change their blocking scheme for the same play is slightly ridiculous. A lineman's blocking assignment is rarely as simple as it is on paper; it shifts with the defense's alignment and it shifts if the center or QB read a blitz. Defense shifts from right to left late in the cadence? Guess what, your assignment has shifted. Your brain when you're up at the line, especially in a pro-style offense, is constantly working... it's damn near calculus. Throwing another variable in there makes the job even more difficult.
Posted by RhodeDawg
Delete my account
Member since Jun 2016
4450 posts
Posted on 7/11/17 at 12:45 pm to
Great answer. Thank you.

Do you mind if I ask if you fit into one of my 2 categories?
Posted by crispyUGA
Upstate SC
Member since Feb 2011
15919 posts
Posted on 7/11/17 at 12:52 pm to
I signed a scholarship (not for UGA, I was never that good), never played. I was on campus and participating in workouts when I hurt my back and, combined with bad shoulders, a bad knee, and a bad ankle, I decided to hang it up. Transferred to UGA after a year and lettered in partying.
This post was edited on 7/11/17 at 12:53 pm
Posted by JacketFan77
Tiger, GA
Member since Nov 2012
2554 posts
Posted on 7/11/17 at 12:54 pm to
Works for us.
Posted by crispyUGA
Upstate SC
Member since Feb 2011
15919 posts
Posted on 7/11/17 at 12:56 pm to
Wing-T/Flex TO blocking schemes and Pro-Style blocking schemes are very, very different.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter