Started By
Message

I apologize for my transgressions

Posted on 12/21/15 at 4:20 pm
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46505 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 4:20 pm
From now on I will be taking the policy of "If you can't post something nice, post gifs of hot chicks"





Posted by PhilipMarlowe
Member since Mar 2013
20459 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 4:22 pm to
3,1,













2
This post was edited on 12/21/15 at 4:23 pm
Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
55169 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 4:22 pm to
Roger, your sources are 110% correct on this one
Posted by SafetySam
Gettysburg, PA
Member since Oct 2013
7166 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 4:58 pm to
Support.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 5:12 pm to
quote:


From now on I will be taking the policy of "If you can't post something nice, post gifs of hot chicks"



Read and heed RK's words, chirruns
Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
55169 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 5:55 pm to
Hypothetically speaking, if someone posted naked boobies on our board, would you ban them?

Asking for a friend
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46505 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 6:22 pm to
Yes, inquiring minds and all that
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46505 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 6:23 pm to
And which LSU queer down voted boob gifs?
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 6:29 pm to
Why would I ban someone for posting blank posts? I can only enforce what I see/know about.

Quit asking silly questions, Sarge
Posted by Warrior Poet
Living Rent-Free in Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2011
7951 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 6:38 pm to
1) I appreciate the titties

2) I want to hear the information you are willing to share that you get from folks in the AD

3) BUT - I don't want to hear it in every thread as part of your comprehensive melt

4) BUT - I want you to consider the source and stop posting it as absolute fact. Your friends are part of a group that inherently conflicts with the HC. It's no surprise that they only say negative things.

5) BUT - stop letting the negative info you get define your views. You melt to damn much you're just a step below cgsc....that's just my opinion tho
Posted by Agforlife
Somewhere in the Brazos Valley
Member since Nov 2012
20102 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 6:48 pm to
I approve of this message
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79732 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

BUT - stop letting the negative info you get define your views. You melt to damn much you're just a step below cgsc....that's just my opinion tho


Here's a thought...you suck at censoring others and controlling messages, so just stop trying.
Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
55169 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 6:52 pm to
Settle down boys



Louisville is the real enemy at the moment
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79732 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 6:53 pm to
quote:

Louisville is the real enemy at the moment


Louisville is just a means to an end at this point.

The true enemy...is someone who kaiser has identified multiple times.


frickLSU(tm)
This post was edited on 12/21/15 at 6:54 pm
Posted by Warrior Poet
Living Rent-Free in Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2011
7951 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 6:55 pm to
You melt 90% of the time. The other 10% is compiling stats. That is who you are; it's not like I'm making up facts.

No one is censoring you, but I bet I'm not the only one who is tired of your uninformed meltdowns.
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79732 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 6:58 pm to
quote:

You melt 90% of the time. The other 10% is compiling stats


1. Those numbers are bullshite

2. In order to provide proof refuting point number 1, you'd have to actually research and document information supporting your claim...which would be quite sad. So your choices are either to a) be wrong or b) be right and make yourself look pathetic in the process.

3. You're basically trying to tell Klarvin to tone down or censor his views...not mine.
This post was edited on 12/21/15 at 6:59 pm
Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
55169 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

1. Those numbers are bullshite



Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 7:06 pm to
The Count strikes

Posted by Warrior Poet
Living Rent-Free in Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2011
7951 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 7:08 pm to
quote:

1. Those numbers are bullshite





There is an entire thread created today discussing the rampant melting, in which the bitch melts by you and the AD melts by RK are implicitly the primary targets.

Roger posts this thread, which I believe to mean he isn't going to report his information anymore.

I post my response, suggesting that perhaps it's not his information but his presentation (relentless presentation).

I like his insight I just think it clouds his perspective. This has been brought up by other posters as well. It's not censorship it's just statement of fact.

Your melting, on the other hand, is like if AIDS and cancer fricked. There's no cure and there's no end in sight.
This post was edited on 12/21/15 at 7:09 pm
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79732 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 7:11 pm to
quote:

There is an entire thread created today discussing the rampant melting,


1. It's discussing moderation

2. Rampant sunshine pumping or attempts to quell and shout down negative input are just as bad, if not worse than constant melting.

3. You're starting to act like pubes in that you just cannot let something go without getting the last word in.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter