Started By
Message

Here's why I honestly think Hubanek starts

Posted on 10/28/15 at 12:13 pm
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 10/28/15 at 12:13 pm
Look at the Dread Pirate Mike Leach's tenure as Spread King of College Football.

Correct me if I am wrong, but the least experienced QBs he fielded were Graham Harrell and our hero, Kliff Kingsbury, who were redshirt sophomores, meaning that by the time they took a starter snap they'd been in the system for two complete years.

For a long string of time in between those two, Leach's plug-and-play record-breakers were seniors.

My point is that the greatest living operator of the spread saw the need to play experienced quarterbacks and favored experience over talent.

Why?

Because the spread requires, above all other things, quick decision-making by the quarterback in order to be successful. You have to get the ball and strike, get the ball and strike. That only comes with experience. That only comes after going through thousands of practice reps scrimmages and drills designed to instill that capacity in you.

Look: Sonny Cumbie lead the nation in passing and total offense and beat Aaron Rodgers in the Holiday Bowl. Sonny. Cumbie.

It's not about talent. It's about being drilled to the point where you automatically, instinctively fire that pigskin out to a receiver, whose job it is to get YAC, the second you get it.

Johnny, who had at least redshirted by the way, was able to get it done on talent because he was a freak once in a lifetime player.

We're out of those.

The closest we get to the experience needed to get the ball out to playmakers in lightning fashion is Hubanek. He practiced in this system when he was at Oklahoma State and he played in it at Blinn. Collegiate-level practice and playing time, not Allen High School where your players are better than your opponents players in every position, every game because you have a student population of 50,000 to pull from.

Kyle Allen may be a great QB for a pro-style offense, but at this point it is fair to say that he isn't a "fire that pigskin" guy. He takes too long to turn loose the ball and he's (and the play calls built to suit him are) always looking for big throws.

I think Sumlin realizes now that there's no shortcut in this offensive system when it comes to QB. You can't play freshmen. We need a guy who can operate. Not a star, not a hero, not perfect, just a guy who can come in and get rid of the ball. Knows the offense, has a quick release, has the guts to just make the short strikes the way he is supposed to most of the time. That's Hubanek. We play him, dump the long sideline throws, rein in the bubble screens, and do a lot more meshes and slants and we'll win 10.
This post was edited on 10/28/15 at 12:16 pm
Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
55206 posts
Posted on 10/28/15 at 12:21 pm to
Some good points but how do we know Kyler isn't a freak like Johnny as well?



I also see jake as a winning option too. He was successful and talented at Blinn, remember who else was successful and talented at Blinn??? Cam freakin Newton
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 10/28/15 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

Some good points but how do we know Kyler isn't a freak like Johnny as well?


Because we've seen him play and he doesn't have Johnny's accuracy. He also doesn't know what he's doing out there and it's obvious. This goes to my point about freshmen being unsuccessful in this offense. Even Johnny redshirted. Heck Kyler didn't even show up in the spring and skipped out for weeks in the summer to showboat at the ESPYs. This offense is about repetition, not skill. It's about being a robot. Kyler is not even close to that.
Posted by slacker00
Member since Mar 2011
588 posts
Posted on 10/28/15 at 12:30 pm to
Why are we even having an QB competition at this point in the season? I understand in spring/fall or maybe even early season but now? Why don't the coaches plug in who they think they next man up is and we move on?
Posted by Gritshack
Member since Oct 2015
20 posts
Posted on 10/28/15 at 12:32 pm to
Didn't case keenum run this offense effectively for like 6 years?
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 10/28/15 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

Why are we even having an QB competition at this point in the season? I understand in spring/fall or maybe even early season but now? Why don't the coaches plug in who they think they next man up is and we move on?


They feel the need for a smokescreen to distance themselves from direct personal responsibility. This way they can point to an "objective" "process" that decided for them.
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 10/28/15 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

Didn't case keenum run this offense effectively for like 6 years?


He is the closest it comes to an exception, but he did redshirt and didn't start until midway though the next year.
Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
55206 posts
Posted on 10/28/15 at 12:36 pm to
I guess it tells you that they think Jake is better but if they just put him out there Kyler might actually seek a transfer?

Or because Kevin Sumlin's recruiting mantra has always been that every spot is open to the best player.

I don't know really. But if Kyler goes out there and tears sc a new one the vibe around this place will change instantly
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 10/28/15 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

Why are we even having an QB competition at this point in the season? I understand in spring/fall or maybe even early season but now? Why don't the coaches plug in who they think they next man up is and we move on?


Because whoever doesn't get picked probably transfers. In a way we aren't picking the starter for the rest of the season, we are picking a starter for the next season or two.
Posted by PhilipMarlowe
Member since Mar 2013
20470 posts
Posted on 10/28/15 at 12:37 pm to
The last thing sumlin wants is for Jake to win the job this week.
Posted by AgBQ00
Member since Aug 2014
2022 posts
Posted on 10/28/15 at 12:38 pm to
Perception. And ego management
Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
55206 posts
Posted on 10/28/15 at 12:38 pm to
If Jake takes us to 10-3 I don't think Sumlin will mind
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 10/28/15 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

The last thing sumlin wants is for Jake to win the job this week.


The last thing Sumlin wants is to lose to SCAR. Trot a midget QB who doesn't know your offense out there against what is downtrodden but still SEC talent and you take that risk.
Posted by slacker00
Member since Mar 2011
588 posts
Posted on 10/28/15 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

Because whoever doesn't get picked probably transfers. In a way we aren't picking the starter for the rest of the season, we are picking a starter for the next season or two.


Right, but less than a week of practice is nothing compared to the body of work already behind them. I just feel that it is a show. They either already know who they are going to pick and are trying to save face OR they don't know and are going to base the rest of this year and as you said next season on 3 days of practice....
Posted by slacker00
Member since Mar 2011
588 posts
Posted on 10/28/15 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

Perception. And ego management


This is the only thing that makes sense to me.
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 10/28/15 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

Right, but less than a week of practice is nothing compared to the body of work already behind them. I just feel that it is a show.


It is.
Posted by PhilipMarlowe
Member since Mar 2013
20470 posts
Posted on 10/28/15 at 12:45 pm to
The hate for Murray on here is funny.
Posted by JVasquez
Texas
Member since Aug 2014
30 posts
Posted on 10/28/15 at 12:47 pm to
Wow! You guys waving the Hube-snack pom poms are something else. We are talking 3 state titles vs Blinn College? Sure Murray hasn't done well but when has he had a chance to show his stuff?
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
60110 posts
Posted on 10/28/15 at 12:48 pm to
I don't hate Murray and if I were to bet I think he starts Saturday, but Sumlin isn't going to name a starter based on who he fears will transfer. He knows we need to win this year and he will have to answer if we continue to sputter. I don't think he's that dumb
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 10/28/15 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

We are talking 3 state titles


Doesn't mean anything. The list of college QBs who've won a natty but amounted to nothing in the NFL is a mile long for the same reason that Kyler's titles at beyond-loaded Allen don't translate to success in college.
This post was edited on 10/28/15 at 12:52 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter