Started By
Message
re: Xavier Thomas to Clemson
Posted on 4/11/17 at 9:56 pm to Cheese Grits
Posted on 4/11/17 at 9:56 pm to Cheese Grits
my post count will be a lot smaller if you and others stop talking trash to me. i'm responding to a lot of off topic insults.
you've posted numerous times on this topic without actually discussing the topic recruit or the Ohio kid that was brought up.
in my view, a troll is a person is always trying to get a thread off topic.
there have already been several threads started to complain about me so I don't understand why you feel to turn yet another thread into a discussion of how much you hate me.
you've posted numerous times on this topic without actually discussing the topic recruit or the Ohio kid that was brought up.
in my view, a troll is a person is always trying to get a thread off topic.
there have already been several threads started to complain about me so I don't understand why you feel to turn yet another thread into a discussion of how much you hate me.
This post was edited on 4/11/17 at 10:01 pm
2
Posted on 4/11/17 at 10:03 pm to Tillman
quote:
how much you hate me
I do not hate you, I am just waiting for your alter persona to fall and reveal the real you.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 8:09 am to Tillman
See the problem is you are saying there are people saying Carman is a lock for OSU. I said it was 75/25 and you tried to act like I was completely wrong for thinking that, even though all the recruiting experts, and every inside poster with knowledge of recruiting seems to think he is going to OSU.
25% he goes to Clemson is higher than most are giving him as of now. OSU insiders also say he may be creating drama where there was none previously.
I admit that him gushing about Clemson is pretty telling, but to say that 1A/1B are not tied is just trying to talk semantics. If he said OSU was 1A and Clemson was 1B would you be saying OSU leads?
You are trolling at this point.
25% he goes to Clemson is higher than most are giving him as of now. OSU insiders also say he may be creating drama where there was none previously.
I admit that him gushing about Clemson is pretty telling, but to say that 1A/1B are not tied is just trying to talk semantics. If he said OSU was 1A and Clemson was 1B would you be saying OSU leads?
You are trolling at this point.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 8:14 am to Buckeye06
For his logic though only experts that support a positive outcome to CU are correct. He will call out experts that say OSU and anyone that disagrees with him and say they do not know. But runs with one quote that is all knowing because it supports CU.
I also like how he complains that people attack him or call him names but has no issue when he does it. Again I do not think Tillman has hit his teens yet and the reason for his or her rant.
But don't worry they will be back to get in the last word as always.
I also like how he complains that people attack him or call him names but has no issue when he does it. Again I do not think Tillman has hit his teens yet and the reason for his or her rant.
But don't worry they will be back to get in the last word as always.
This post was edited on 4/12/17 at 8:42 am
Posted on 4/12/17 at 8:15 am to TideWarrior
I'm bored at work so whatever fight on 
Posted on 4/12/17 at 9:10 am to TideWarrior
quote:
For his logic though only experts that support a positive outcome to CU are correct. He will call out experts that say OSU and anyone that disagrees with him and say they do not know. But runs with one quote that is all knowing because it supports CU.
I wonder how he/she feels about the experts that predicted Clemson would beat Pitt last year?
Posted on 4/12/17 at 11:00 am to Buckeye06
quote:
See the problem is you are saying there are people saying Carman is a lock for OSU. I said it was 75/25 and you tried to act like I was completely wrong for thinking that, even though all the recruiting experts, and every inside poster with knowledge of recruiting seems to think he is going to OSU.
25% he goes to Clemson is higher than most are giving him as of now. OSU insiders also say he may be creating drama where there was none previously.
I admit that him gushing about Clemson is pretty telling, but to say that 1A/1B are not tied is just trying to talk semantics. If he said OSU was 1A and Clemson was 1B would you be saying OSU leads?
You are trolling at this point.
yes because disagreeing with a OSU fanboy is trolling. i must bow to you.
it deoesn't make sense to say OSU has a higher chance of getting him if the kid himself says Clemson is his 1A and he makes point of saying that staying in Ohio won't be the reason he attends OSU if he does choose to go there.
you can quote 'experts' all day but they don't know what the kid is going to do. it makes sense to think for yourself and make conclusions based on what he has said.
This post was edited on 4/12/17 at 11:03 am
Posted on 4/12/17 at 11:00 am to Buckeye06
delete, double post
This post was edited on 4/12/17 at 11:02 am
Posted on 4/12/17 at 11:04 am to TideWarrior
quote:
or his logic though only experts that support a positive outcome to CU are correct. He will call out experts that say OSU and anyone that disagrees with him and say they do not know. But runs with one quote that is all knowing because it supports CU.
I also like how he complains that people attack him or call him names but has no issue when he does it. Again I do not think Tillman has hit his teens yet and the reason for his or her rant.
But don't worry they will be back to get in the last word as always.
again, I never said Clemson is a lock to get the kid. I simply said that is dumb for people to predict that he is going to OSU, given his comments. all anybody can sasy right now is it looks like he will got to either Clemson or OSU.
what is so hard to grasp about this? what is it that are you so angry about? why does some hick Alabama fan even care, it doesn't sound like he going alabama. why don't you go talk about a recruit that yoou more likely to get?
This post was edited on 4/12/17 at 11:06 am
Posted on 4/12/17 at 12:03 pm to Tillman
quote:
why does some hick Alabama fan
There we go with the name calling. I guess she has her phone out at recess at the junior high she attends.
We know she is not old enough to have ever attended CU because if she did she would be calling people the names she has considering the demographic of the people surrounding Clemson.
This post was edited on 4/12/17 at 12:05 pm
Posted on 4/12/17 at 12:11 pm to TideWarrior
i know you don't understand this b/c you didn't attend college, but Clemson and other large state universities are not community colleges. they draw students from all over the state and country.
plus there are a ton of rich people in the CLemson area living on the lakes. i think far more rich people than you will find living in the ugly mill town of tuscaloosa.
i love how you guys say I name call when you constantly attack me. I only respond in kind.
plus there are a ton of rich people in the CLemson area living on the lakes. i think far more rich people than you will find living in the ugly mill town of tuscaloosa.
i love how you guys say I name call when you constantly attack me. I only respond in kind.
This post was edited on 4/12/17 at 12:12 pm
Posted on 4/12/17 at 12:15 pm to Tillman
Nice to know I need not to attend college to teach at one and maybe I should just drop out of my current doctorate program because based on your info I only need a HS diploma to teach at Clemson. 
You just saved me a lot of money.
BTW Clemson is spelled without the "L" being capitalized. When you visit CU for the first time you will see that I am correct in how to spell it.
You just saved me a lot of money.
BTW Clemson is spelled without the "L" being capitalized. When you visit CU for the first time you will see that I am correct in how to spell it.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 12:22 pm to TideSaint
quote:
I wonder how he/she feels about the experts that predicted Clemson would beat Pitt last year?
Bama wins every game it's favored in? I didn't know that.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 12:37 pm to IStillMissDanny
quote:
Bama wins every game it's favored in? I didn't know that.
Don't be an idiot. Of course they don't win every game they are favored in.
Your retard partner keeps throwing experts into the conversation like their word is always wrong.
If they were wrong every single time like he/she is implying then they wouldn't be experts.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 12:42 pm to IStillMissDanny
quote:
Bama wins every game it's favored in? I didn't know that.
That would be nice but still even then will fail to cover most of the time.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 1:29 pm to IStillMissDanny
pitt got 4 dubious calls on 3rd and long passes, and then there was that bogus penalty on Boelware when he made a tackle.
you could tell a dossier had gone out to the refs from the ACC head office after FSU and Lville's coach had whined about Clemson.
i think Pitt only ended up with 3 penalties in the game and Clemson was penalized much more than season average.
you could tell a dossier had gone out to the refs from the ACC head office after FSU and Lville's coach had whined about Clemson.
i think Pitt only ended up with 3 penalties in the game and Clemson was penalized much more than season average.
This post was edited on 4/12/17 at 1:32 pm
Posted on 4/12/17 at 1:34 pm to Tillman
quote:
pitt got 4 dubious calls on 3rd and long passes, and then there was that bogus penalty on Boelware when he made a tackle.
Is this where we make excuses for our team losing?
Okay. If Bo Scarborough hadn't broken his leg Alabama wins going away.
Thanks for the forum to get that off of my chest.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 1:38 pm to TideSaint
i thought alabama had more depth than Clemson. henry was your starter but you are saying only Scarborough could do anything against CLemson's D, it was that good.
scarboroguh only had 1 or 2 big runs, he averaged like 2.9 yards on rest of his runs. and if he had played, then maybe the QB doesn't get his late big run, or they don't do that trick play that went for big yards, etc b/c they are trying to run Scarborough.
obviously numerous bad calls had an impact on a game Pitt only won with 6 seconds left on a 48 yard FG.
and hard to believe a team that got destroyed on pass defense, they gave up 520 yards in the air, didn't have more than 3 penalties for 30 yard or so on defense.
scarboroguh only had 1 or 2 big runs, he averaged like 2.9 yards on rest of his runs. and if he had played, then maybe the QB doesn't get his late big run, or they don't do that trick play that went for big yards, etc b/c they are trying to run Scarborough.
obviously numerous bad calls had an impact on a game Pitt only won with 6 seconds left on a 48 yard FG.
and hard to believe a team that got destroyed on pass defense, they gave up 520 yards in the air, didn't have more than 3 penalties for 30 yard or so on defense.
This post was edited on 4/12/17 at 1:42 pm
Posted on 4/12/17 at 1:42 pm to Tillman
quote:
i thought alabama had more depth than Clemson.
What does that have to do with Bo Scarborough breaking his leg? Clemson couldn't stop him. If he hadn't gotten hurt and carried the ball throughout the 4th quarter Alabama wins by double digits.
quote:
scarboroguh only had 1 or 2 big runs, he averaged like 2.9 yards on rest of his runs.
I mean he averaged 5.8 yards a carry and was just getting warmed up.
quote:
obviously numerous bad calls had an impact on a game Pitt only won with 6 seconds left on a 48 yard FG.
Of course they were bad calls. They went against your team.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 1:44 pm to Tillman
quote:
you could tell a dossier had gone out to the refs from the ACC head office after FSU and Lville's coach had whined about Clemson.
Fake news CNN doesn't want us to know about it but Tillman knows the truth.
Page 9 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News