Started By
Message
re: SI article Grading how new coaches fared in recruiting this year...SIAP
Posted on 3/5/13 at 5:38 pm to WonderWartHawg
Posted on 3/5/13 at 5:38 pm to WonderWartHawg
Wasn't my list, feel free to go leave a comment or write an email to the author.
0
Posted on 3/5/13 at 5:44 pm to WonderWartHawg
quote:
Well, if you want to be 'subjective' about it - how about taking into account the shitty previous year with a lame duck staff and an extremely late start on recruiting by Bielema WHILE trying to put together a staff.
All these points are identical for UK. Shitty previous year (and years previous), basically a lame duck staff who did not have a good foundation for a recruiting class before Stoops and a relatively late start on recruiting for Stoops as well.
How you do not see the point that what Stoops did at UK is more impressive than BB at Arky is unbelievable. Believe it or not, Arkansas is a program that should consistently pull in top 30-35 classes. UK is not that quality of program. Doing top 30 at UK is harder than at Arky. Therefore Stoops job > BB
BB should get at least a B- though
Posted on 3/7/13 at 3:04 am to GenesChin
Arky fans even want to be the best at sucking.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News