Started By
Message
2017 Recruiting classes ranked by Quality
Posted on 2/2/17 at 8:53 pm
Posted on 2/2/17 at 8:53 pm
1.Ohio St 94.4
2.Bama 93.6
3.UGA 92.7
4.Stanford 92.4
5.Clemson 92.1
6.USC 91.6
7.LSU 91.4
8.Michigan 91.0
9.FSU 91.0
10.OU 89.9
11.AU 89.2 & ND 89.2
13.UF 88.8 & PSU 88.8
15.Miami 88.6
16.Washington 88.4
17.UCLA 88.2
18.AnM 88.1
19.Neb 87.6
20.Texas 87.5
21. Vols 87.1 & Oregon 87.1
23.SC 87.0
24.Maryland 86.8
25.Miss St 86.7
26.UNC 86.6
27.Utah 86.4
28.Ark 86.2 & VT 86.2
30.OM 86.0 & UK 86.0 & ASU 86.0
2.Bama 93.6
3.UGA 92.7
4.Stanford 92.4
5.Clemson 92.1
6.USC 91.6
7.LSU 91.4
8.Michigan 91.0
9.FSU 91.0
10.OU 89.9
11.AU 89.2 & ND 89.2
13.UF 88.8 & PSU 88.8
15.Miami 88.6
16.Washington 88.4
17.UCLA 88.2
18.AnM 88.1
19.Neb 87.6
20.Texas 87.5
21. Vols 87.1 & Oregon 87.1
23.SC 87.0
24.Maryland 86.8
25.Miss St 86.7
26.UNC 86.6
27.Utah 86.4
28.Ark 86.2 & VT 86.2
30.OM 86.0 & UK 86.0 & ASU 86.0
8
Posted on 2/2/17 at 8:56 pm to djsdawg
How do you determine the quality of a college football player who has yet to play a single snap in college?
Posted on 2/2/17 at 9:05 pm to djsdawg
What if Alabama didn't sign a two star snapper? What if they rated specialists on the same scale?
Posted on 2/2/17 at 9:10 pm to CapstoneGrad06
Also had a kicker. So take away the two special teams guys, and then what's our average?
Posted on 2/2/17 at 9:24 pm to djsdawg
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 8:20 pm
Posted on 2/2/17 at 9:32 pm to CCTider
Not sure the kicker counts, since he's a blueshirt. But the long snapper had a rating of .75 or so. Even the kicker was more than .80. But specialists are never rated on a similar scale.
Posted on 2/2/17 at 10:03 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Vols 87.1
Butch needs to be irl murdered
Posted on 2/2/17 at 10:06 pm to Edearl Watson
quote:
How do you determine the quality of a college football player who has yet to play a single snap in college?
Are you really asking me how recruiting rankings are done?
Posted on 2/2/17 at 10:10 pm to djsdawg
This is likely his way of arguing that Florida's class is not that far off of Georgia's, like the rest of the Gators OTB
Posted on 2/3/17 at 6:51 am to Edearl Watson
Why even do rankings at all then?? None of these kids have played. It's all a crapshoot
Point of this thread is to show not all recruiting classes are equal. Small classes can have great quality as determined by analysts. Clemson for example had a small class ranked in the teens overall, but their average player ranking puts them 5th.
Point of this thread is to show not all recruiting classes are equal. Small classes can have great quality as determined by analysts. Clemson for example had a small class ranked in the teens overall, but their average player ranking puts them 5th.
Posted on 2/3/17 at 8:03 am to djsdawg
All I know is UGA might have signed the largest OL class I've ever seen.
D'Marcus Hayes 6'6" 320
Isaiah Wilson 6'7" 350
Andrew Thomas 6'4.5" 335
Netori Johnson 6'3" 341
D'Antne Demery 6'5.5" 319
Justin Shaffer 6'5" 356
That's mammoth. That's literally a ton of OL.
D'Marcus Hayes 6'6" 320
Isaiah Wilson 6'7" 350
Andrew Thomas 6'4.5" 335
Netori Johnson 6'3" 341
D'Antne Demery 6'5.5" 319
Justin Shaffer 6'5" 356
That's mammoth. That's literally a ton of OL.
Posted on 2/3/17 at 8:20 am to UAtide11
Pittman and Kang said we wanted to get bigger and stronger on the OL... Mission Accomplished?
Posted on 2/3/17 at 8:52 am to CCTider
Other teams have kickers as well.
Posted on 2/3/17 at 8:56 am to djsdawg
You mean by average player rating
Posted on 2/3/17 at 9:04 am to CCTider
quote:
Also had a kicker. So take away the two special teams guys, and then what's our average?
Did you sign a kicker to play football for your team? If yes, then it counts.
Posted on 2/3/17 at 9:32 am to crispyUGA
quote:
Pittman and Kang said we wanted to get bigger and stronger on the OL... Mission Accomplished?
I think it's safe to say the era of 280 lb UGA OL is being phased out.
Posted on 2/3/17 at 9:33 am to djsdawg
Probably need to consider a factor such as did the team fill their most pressing needs.
Probably get a lot more accurate read on this next year at this time.
Probably get a lot more accurate read on this next year at this time.
Posted on 2/3/17 at 9:37 am to CapstoneGrad06
I mean Bama was 2nd on the list and OSU signed a kicker too. If you take Bama's top 20 guys they are better than OSU's since OSU only took 21
Posted on 2/3/17 at 9:44 am to thunderbird1100
Clearly. Not taking quantity into account.
Posted on 2/3/17 at 11:37 am to The Baker
quote:
Damn, LSU blew it.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News