Started By
Message
You're welcome Tennessee...
Posted on 5/27/15 at 2:32 pm
Posted on 5/27/15 at 2:32 pm
quote:
Winning the 2010 LSU game wouldn't suddenly make Dooley a good coach, but it might've bought him more time to flounder around at UT.
So as painful as the loss was at the time, maybe it's a good thing the Vols lost that game to LSU in 2010. Because another year of Dooley was not what the Tennessee program needed.
LINK
11
Posted on 5/27/15 at 2:33 pm to GeauxToBed
there is a similar thought that if chiz had beat you guys in that miserably boring 12-10 game then he'd have stuck around longer too.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 2:34 pm to GeauxToBed
Yeah, sucked at the time, but in the long run it was for the best.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 2:36 pm to GeauxToBed
quote:Didn't he flounder about for 2 more years?
but it might've bought him more time to flounder around at UT.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 2:37 pm to GeauxToBed
Dooley went 0-16 against ranked teams
Posted on 5/27/15 at 2:40 pm to GeauxToBed
God that was crazy. I remember being very pissed then realizing we got another shot. Les would've been in even more hot water had that went wrong. (Pretty sure that was the season after the Ole Miss and Penn State time issues)
Posted on 5/27/15 at 2:40 pm to Phat Phil
Dooley should have never been hired. When yall got like the fifth rejection you should have gone the interim route.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 2:43 pm to GeauxToBed
I was a pledge in 2010; the Tennessee/Alabama games are truly the only games I somewhat remember & I attended every one
Eta: & I only remember the last 5-10 minutes of the Tennessee game
Eta: & I only remember the last 5-10 minutes of the Tennessee game
This post was edited on 5/27/15 at 3:03 pm
Posted on 5/27/15 at 2:45 pm to GeauxToBed
Tennessee might have a Coaching trend going here... Fired -> Hired away -> Fired -> ?
Posted on 5/27/15 at 3:07 pm to UsingUpAllTheLetters
Just wait for Notre Dame to fire Brian Kelly. That's been Butch's MO. He succeeded Kelly at Central Michigan then at Cincinnati.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 3:08 pm to cardboardboxer
quote:
Dooley should have never been hired.
It's "should of..."
Posted on 5/27/15 at 3:15 pm to AaronDeTiger
quote:
It's "should of..."
No, the proper contraction is "should’ve" which is short for what I put: "should have."
"Should of" is wrong and only exists because of idiots who hear "should've" and misspell it when writing it down.
Here is some reading on it:
LINK
LINK
You are welcome.
This post was edited on 5/27/15 at 3:17 pm
Posted on 5/27/15 at 3:17 pm to cardboardboxer
Someone missed the joke. It just really surprised me that someone got "should have" right twice in one post on this website.
This post was edited on 5/27/15 at 3:18 pm
Posted on 5/27/15 at 3:22 pm to AaronDeTiger
No, it's "should'uv". Dang, y'all are dumb. :-D
Posted on 5/27/15 at 3:23 pm to AaronDeTiger
I figured it was a joke but didn't care enough to ask.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 3:24 pm to AaronDeTiger
quote:
Someone missed the joke
I did, you are a good poster so I took you at your world. That was lame of me, my bad.
quote:
It just really surprised me that someone got "should have" right twice in one post on this website.
You should see the big words I pull out when we really talk realignment.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 3:27 pm to cardboardboxer
Realignment is a big word. It's good to use words with four syllables, then the Gumps can't understand and it's like we're speaking a secret language. :-D
Posted on 5/27/15 at 3:29 pm to GeauxToBed
i saw the "ending" on tv and then jumped in the car and turned on the post game show. was incredibly confused why hawthorne was screaming in excitement.
Posted on 5/27/15 at 3:30 pm to AaronDeTiger
quote:
It's "should of..."
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News