Started By
Message
Would you trade your teams integrity for championships?
Posted on 10/12/16 at 8:56 am
Posted on 10/12/16 at 8:56 am
I am talking about recruiting athletes that win you championships but also give your school s reputation of guns and drugs and arrests.
28
Posted on 10/12/16 at 8:58 am to tigerfan63
quote:
I am talking about recruiting athletes that win you championships but also give your school s reputation of guns and drugs and arrests
Most schools have that and they don't win championships.
Posted on 10/12/16 at 8:59 am to tigerfan63
I mean, Ole Miss does this and still doesn't win shite
Posted on 10/12/16 at 8:59 am to tigerfan63
Why u got Bama on the brain this morning?
Posted on 10/12/16 at 9:01 am to tigerfan63
I would yes.
But I think it would be only fair to allow the team to vote on it.
But I think it would be only fair to allow the team to vote on it.
Posted on 10/12/16 at 9:02 am to tigerfan63
Pretty sure Tennessee fans that complained about the annual Fulmer cup would make that trade off now.
Also, 90's Miami says you forgot hookers.
Also, 90's Miami says you forgot hookers.
Posted on 10/12/16 at 9:03 am to tigerfan63
quote:
give your school s reputation of guns and drugs and arrests
Name a school that DOESN'T have athletes that in some way harm their school's reputation.
Also, LSU recruits those same type of athletes without the championships, so I'm pretty sure you'd rather have what you've got talent wise AND championships than not.
Posted on 10/12/16 at 9:03 am to tigerfan63
Bama fans need not respond, already have
Posted on 10/12/16 at 9:06 am to CNB
quote:
I mean, Ole Miss does this and still doesn't win shite
It's worked out well for AU though (besides that 57 year stretch).
Posted on 10/12/16 at 9:06 am to Rantavious
Bama is a good comparison. They remind me of nebraska in the 90's. Give up your soul and recruit thugs just to win games. When people think of bammer they automatically think of everything that is wrong with college athletics. Guns and drugs,etc.
Posted on 10/12/16 at 9:08 am to tigerfan63
quote:
Bama is a good comparison. They remind me of nebraska in the 90's. Give up your soul and recruit thugs just to win games. When people think of bammer they automatically think of everything that is wrong with college athletics. Guns and drugs,etc
LSU has the same type of athletes.
Posted on 10/12/16 at 9:08 am to tigerfan63
Glass houses...
Posted on 10/12/16 at 9:09 am to tigerfan63
The quality of LSU posters on this board has gone to absolute shite lately. Are there any good ones left? If so, could you please escort some of these morons back to the Tiger Rant?
Posted on 10/12/16 at 9:12 am to TheTideMustRoll
quote:
The quality of LSU posters on this board has gone to absolute shite lately.
Because the rest of the fan bases just keep pumping out gems, right?
Posted on 10/12/16 at 9:13 am to tigerfan63
I bet if you were to remove all the players who do some type of drug or have a weapon, you would have division III teams, maybe even Juco caliber.
Posted on 10/12/16 at 9:13 am to RB10
:usa: :usa:
Posted on 10/12/16 at 9:13 am to Porter Osborne Jr
Georgia recruited and signed the same kids and hasn't won shite.
Posted on 10/12/16 at 9:18 am to tigerfan63
Well considering we do it already, frick yeah.
Posted on 10/12/16 at 9:23 am to tigerfan63
quote:ABSOLUTELY!
I am talking about recruiting athletes that win you championships but also give your school s reputation of guns and drugs and arrests.
I mean I'd rather have guns/drugs/arrests/fights and WIN championships than be like every other team with guns/drugs/arrests/fights and not win them.
Posted on 10/12/16 at 9:24 am to Porter Osborne Jr
quote:
It's worked out well for AU though (besides that 57 year stretch).
UGA on the other hand has gone the way of Ole Miss
Page 1 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News