re: Why Isn't Freeze Involved In OM Fact Finding?

Because now that it involves coaches paying players, he is the one being investigated. Look up what constitutes LOIC and you'll see why.

Praise heaven for that. Wacky Jackie is in a league all by himself!

quote:

---

set the fox to guard the henhouse Putting somebody in charge of a job, when they have a conflict of interest. Often used to refer to industry "self-regulation" or to putting an industry insider on the board that regulates that industry, e.g., appointing an executive of Comcast as chairman of the FCC.

---

LINK

He's to busy playing golf.

The Head Coach hardly ever does this. Schools have a work around for the approval of such acts. It can be someone that works in the football operations, the AD's office,etc. Sometimes even a booster will fund the trip and not tell the head coach. All of these are built in to give the coach an out when something is found out. A booster who is a real estate developer that funds these has no consequence professionally. A coach can be blackballed forever. Plus it looks better in the NCAA's eyes if the coach didn't know. The coach "knows" but he doesn't "know". In illegal activity the coach very rarely has any involvement in impermissible benefits. Oh he lets boosters know who he's like to sign but usually stops there outside of normal recruiting visits. The player is also informed that they are not to discuss the situation with the head coach. Been going on for 100 years.