Started By
Message
Why again will Ole Miss get in more trouble if Hugh simply liked the ladies?
Posted on 8/7/17 at 1:37 pm
Posted on 8/7/17 at 1:37 pm
Haven't been following every detail but Finebaum insinuating the problem was he had other lady friends, besides the escort. That is more a personal problem for Hugh as opposed to something additional against Ole Miss, IMO.
This post was edited on 8/7/17 at 1:38 pm
Posted on 8/7/17 at 1:40 pm to tigerskin
IF HF is shown to have zero credibility about this, then he has zero + credibility about his denial of any involvement in NCAA violations. The Black Bears are standing so strongly behind him..or were...and if he's proven to be a liar once, then the burden falls on him/them to prove his innocence. And apparently he cann't.
Posted on 8/7/17 at 1:44 pm to tigerskin
Yeah, that would be boring. I don't want it to be gross and illegal but if there's more dirt I'd hope it's more exciting than him just having more chicks on the side- one needs to be a tranny at least or something to keep it interesting.
Posted on 8/7/17 at 1:44 pm to tigerskin
OM's response to the findings was that the violations were done by fired staffers and that the program would be fixed by their coach of high moral fiber.
He is no longer their coach because he didn't have high moral fiber and all indications are that the violations took place under him, as opposed to the school blaming Nutt for things.
Having to change your story between your response to the NCAA and your hearing won't end well.
He is no longer their coach because he didn't have high moral fiber and all indications are that the violations took place under him, as opposed to the school blaming Nutt for things.
Having to change your story between your response to the NCAA and your hearing won't end well.
Posted on 8/7/17 at 1:45 pm to tigerskin
quote:
Haven't been following every detail but Finebaum insinuating the problem was he had other lady friends, besides the escort. That is more a personal problem for Hugh as opposed to something additional against Ole Miss, IMO.
PF's opinion on Freeze can't be trusted as he clearly likes the guy personally and might even consider him a friend. It's been very obvious since SEC media days that PF goes easy on him.
Saying that his problem was just sex seems like an attempt to deflect that those hookers were likely being bought for players as well as any other NCAA violations that occurred.
This post was edited on 8/7/17 at 1:47 pm
Posted on 8/7/17 at 1:46 pm to piggilicious
Hopefully along the lines of a tranny and point shaving. Maybe the tranny was also his bookie. That'd be pretty interesting.
Posted on 8/7/17 at 1:55 pm to Carolina_Girl
quote:
along the lines of a tranny and point shaving. Maybe the tranny was also his bookie
So y'all are saying CHF was shaving points in games to help his lady-boy sidepiece gambling habits?
I gotta spread this around the webs
Posted on 8/7/17 at 1:58 pm to Vecchio Cane
Yes! That sounds good, maybe he shaved the tranny and also shaved points?
Posted on 8/7/17 at 2:00 pm to Vecchio Cane
A few reasons.
#1, it speaks to the credibility of Freeze.
#2, it speaks to the monitoring of the athletic department of activity within its own premises
#3, it speaks to the ethical environment within which misconduct was normalized.
#4, it may speak to a linkage of Freeze's affections to student athlete activities; if the coach is soliciting 3 prostitutes for himself on a monthly basis, and gets a 4th for his star free as a package deal, its an entirely new level of violation Ole Miss is guilty of doing.
Mind, #4 is nearly impossible to prove, but it takes an extraordinary stepping on one's own foreskin like Freeze did, to make it even plausible.
Overall, the real hit is to the credibility of any defense of the program or its activities.
#1, it speaks to the credibility of Freeze.
#2, it speaks to the monitoring of the athletic department of activity within its own premises
#3, it speaks to the ethical environment within which misconduct was normalized.
#4, it may speak to a linkage of Freeze's affections to student athlete activities; if the coach is soliciting 3 prostitutes for himself on a monthly basis, and gets a 4th for his star free as a package deal, its an entirely new level of violation Ole Miss is guilty of doing.
Mind, #4 is nearly impossible to prove, but it takes an extraordinary stepping on one's own foreskin like Freeze did, to make it even plausible.
Overall, the real hit is to the credibility of any defense of the program or its activities.
Posted on 8/7/17 at 2:00 pm to piggilicious
Bahahahahahaha!!!!
YES!!!! He shaved the tranny as well! Excellent thinking, Piggi!!
YES!!!! He shaved the tranny as well! Excellent thinking, Piggi!!
Posted on 8/7/17 at 2:04 pm to Carolina_Girl
Sneaking into funeral homes and diddling the dead would be ideal.
Make that dead dwarf trannys from Alabama.
Make that dead dwarf trannys from Alabama.
Posted on 8/7/17 at 2:08 pm to Literalist
quote:
Sneaking into funeral homes and diddling the dead would be ideal.
And filming himself doing it!
Posted on 8/7/17 at 2:09 pm to Carolina_Girl
quote:
YES!!!! He shaved the tranny as well! Excellent thinking,
Wait. There are shaved trannies now? I don't keep up for a single weekend and now there are shaved trannies? Geez.
Posted on 8/7/17 at 2:10 pm to Carolina_Girl
quote:
And filming himself doing it!
Posted on 8/7/17 at 2:11 pm to SSpaniel
quote:
Wait. There are shaved trannies now? I don't keep up for a single weekend and now there are shaved trannies? Geez.
Pffffttt, we know a high-roller like yourself only deals with waxed
Posted on 8/7/17 at 2:17 pm to Vecchio Cane
Freeze was also dressed up as a bronie during all of this as well. Freak.
Posted on 8/7/17 at 2:17 pm to Carolina_Girl
Maybe Bo Wallace was the tranny and was shaving points for Freeze to get the booty!
Posted on 8/7/17 at 2:18 pm to BoardReader
quote:I'd hate like hell to have to face the COI for the NCAA for the THIRD time in two years as the OleMiss Athletic Director.
A few reasons.
#1, it speaks to the credibility of Freeze.
#2, it speaks to the monitoring of the athletic department of activity within its own premises
#3, it speaks to the ethical environment within which misconduct was normalized.
#4, it may speak to a linkage of Freeze's affections to student athlete activities; if the coach is soliciting 3 prostitutes for himself on a monthly basis, and gets a 4th for his star free as a package deal, its an entirely new level of violation Ole Miss is guilty of doing.
Mind, #4 is nearly impossible to prove, but it takes an extraordinary stepping on one's own foreskin like Freeze did, to make it even plausible.
Overall, the real hit is to the credibility of any defense of the program or its activities.
To get up there and plead your case and try your damnedest to argue that the Institution had control of athletics when 3 (THREE) of your programs are on NCAA probation? They have zero credibility and the Failure to Monitor tag will stick as well of LOIC.
This post was edited on 8/7/17 at 2:19 pm
Posted on 8/7/17 at 2:18 pm to teke184
quote:
OM's response to the findings was that the violations were done by fired staffers and that the program would be fixed by their coach of high moral fiber.
Having to change your story between your response to the NCAA and your hearing won't end well.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News