Started By
Message
Who's season is more surprising? Auburn or Mizzou?
Posted on 10/23/13 at 12:21 pm
Posted on 10/23/13 at 12:21 pm
(no message)
Posted on 10/23/13 at 12:22 pm to NovaEagle2
Auburn, IMO.
Mizzou was competitive last year, with an IR list longer and more talented than any team in recent memory.
Mizzou was competitive last year, with an IR list longer and more talented than any team in recent memory.
Posted on 10/23/13 at 12:23 pm to NovaEagle2
Mizzou....I expected Auburn to improve, I expected Mizzou would be a repeat of last year. Wrong as hell.
Posted on 10/23/13 at 12:25 pm to YOURADHERE
quote:
Mizzou....I expected Auburn to improve, I expected Mizzou would be a repeat of last year. Wrong as hell.
Me too.
Posted on 10/23/13 at 12:26 pm to YOURADHERE
quote:
Mizzou....I expected Auburn to improve, I expected Mizzou would be a repeat of last year. Wrong as hell.
Exactly this
Posted on 10/23/13 at 12:26 pm to Gcockboi
Auburn - they didn't win a game last year didn't they? The East is too far down to say Mizzou even though they have been impressive to say the least. JMHO
Posted on 10/23/13 at 12:29 pm to roadGator
As a Mizzou fan I say Auburn is more surprising. That is purely because I do not know the players they have and the issues that forced them to be bad last year. I watch every Mizzou game and follow recruiting very closely so I know the issues Mizzou had. I will NOT say I expected them to be 7-0 but I knew they have the potential to do it. With Auburn, they were/are an unknown to me so their success has surprised me more.
Posted on 10/23/13 at 12:31 pm to NovaEagle2
Mizzou, just because I didnt really know too much about them.
I knew Auburn had talent, and I knew the Malzahn is a good coach.
I knew Auburn had talent, and I knew the Malzahn is a good coach.
Posted on 10/23/13 at 12:33 pm to roadGator
quote:You aren't alone apparently
Mizzou....I expected Auburn to improve, I expected Mizzou would be a repeat of last year. Wrong as hell.
quote:We didn't win an SEC game. Overall we were 3-9
Auburn - they didn't win a game last year didn't they?
Posted on 10/23/13 at 12:33 pm to NovaEagle2
This thread didn't work out how you thought
AMIRITE ?
AMIRITE ?
Posted on 10/23/13 at 12:34 pm to NovaEagle2
So far, I'd have to go with Mizzou's undefeated season... I knew that Auburn would be much better, though I didn't expect this! But Mizzzou...I would never have predicted them as the front runner in the SEC East. Congratulations to both of them!
Posted on 10/23/13 at 12:35 pm to NovaEagle2
Mizzou. AU is normally good. Mizzou probably going to ATL second year in...no one saw this coming.
Posted on 10/23/13 at 12:40 pm to NovaEagle2
Auburn. Gary Pinkel has been at Mizzou for 12+ years and has had success there while Auburn came in with a new unproven coach, QB, and new systems. They had a better season than Auburn last year. Auburn has the most impressive win and none of Mizzouri's opponents are ranked.
Posted on 10/23/13 at 12:42 pm to Rabern57
Whatever team is in my logo.
Did I do that right?
Did I do that right?
Posted on 10/23/13 at 12:44 pm to NovaEagle2
Mizzou.
Everyone looked at them as the team that doesn't belong. They're too far north to be SEC. They had a lame duck coach. They had inferior talent. They had a small stadium with fans that aren't as passionate as the rest of us.
Now they're possibly going to Atlanta?
Auburn's a big 6. We're supposed to get back to being competitive.
Everyone looked at them as the team that doesn't belong. They're too far north to be SEC. They had a lame duck coach. They had inferior talent. They had a small stadium with fans that aren't as passionate as the rest of us.
Now they're possibly going to Atlanta?
Auburn's a big 6. We're supposed to get back to being competitive.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News