Started By
Message
Thoughts on UT's OC
Posted on 10/2/14 at 1:17 pm
Posted on 10/2/14 at 1:17 pm
I personally have not been impressed with his play calling. Some of the calls he made against OU were laughable. What does the rant think of his play calling?
3
Posted on 10/2/14 at 1:19 pm to BlueIndian420
I think our OL severely handicaps his play calling capabilities.
Posted on 10/2/14 at 1:19 pm to BlueIndian420
HE did pretty well against UGA 
its not his fault Peterman is scared shitless.
its not his fault Peterman is scared shitless.Posted on 10/2/14 at 1:30 pm to td01241
quote:
HE did pretty well against UGA its not his fault Peterman is scared shitless.
I'd question the odds of winning the Chattanooga game with Peterman in. He is awful.
Posted on 10/2/14 at 1:31 pm to Collins10
Definitely not division 1 caliber, let alone SEC caliber, from the little amount ive seen of him.
Posted on 10/2/14 at 1:32 pm to Collins10
When we got up on Georgia in the first half he went ultra conservative with his play calling. I think if he would have stayed aggressive we might have won. He is frustrating at times to watch call plays.
Posted on 10/2/14 at 1:33 pm to td01241
It's tough to gameplan with how bad our line is.
That being said, some of his play calls have been questionable. Especially the ou game. Starting out the first play of the game with a slow developing reverse when you know their DLine dominates our o line? We lost eight yards and essentially killed our first drive in one play. Again, later in the game, we run run run the ball down the field and go five wide on the goal line and throw a pick 6 in a situation where we need any points we can get and a field goal would've been okay. That ended any comeback chances we had. And the UGA game, we had to put peterman in and he develops a rhythm quickly with short, quick passes, and then after the first series we abandon that for vertical passes and no run plays at all with terrified peterman in there. Some of his thinking doesn't make sense to me.
That being said, some of his play calls have been questionable. Especially the ou game. Starting out the first play of the game with a slow developing reverse when you know their DLine dominates our o line? We lost eight yards and essentially killed our first drive in one play. Again, later in the game, we run run run the ball down the field and go five wide on the goal line and throw a pick 6 in a situation where we need any points we can get and a field goal would've been okay. That ended any comeback chances we had. And the UGA game, we had to put peterman in and he develops a rhythm quickly with short, quick passes, and then after the first series we abandon that for vertical passes and no run plays at all with terrified peterman in there. Some of his thinking doesn't make sense to me.
Posted on 10/2/14 at 1:33 pm to tennfanatic
quote:
I think if Worley would not have gotten hurt he would have won
FIFY
Posted on 10/2/14 at 1:34 pm to BlueIndian420
I think the man is just still learning. He has a good mind, and recruits love him apparently, but it just takes a while to become a good play caller in the SEC.
I wouldn't judge him on the OU game with his OL and the fact that OU has a pretty good defense anyway.
I wouldn't judge him on the OU game with his OL and the fact that OU has a pretty good defense anyway.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News