Started By
Message
re: Thoughts on Frank Martin
Posted on 2/8/17 at 2:45 pm to rockiee
Posted on 2/8/17 at 2:45 pm to rockiee
quote:
but to say his talent wasn't that great doesn't really make sense
When Barnes for his 5* they made Sweet16. 5/6 5* were one and done though and his other years with shite recruiting killed him
Only 2 recruits from #5 class in 2009 and both left after sweet 16
The 5* Myck Kabongo that made the 2011 class was ineligible due to agent contact. Declared for NBA
Posted on 2/8/17 at 2:50 pm to scrooster
quote:she was talking about the real Columbia
she says they are here until they die.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 2:55 pm to GenesChin
We could go back and forth on this for a long time but I still think he underachieved in the coaching department given the talent he brought in. Every coach that recruits at a high level has to deal with turnover from 5 stars. That is not unique to Barnes.
I really just wanted to know what you thought or saw that made you think he was had the best basketball IQ in the SEC. I don't agree with it and wanted to see what you had to offer in terms of defending that statement.
For the record, I think it is a tough call. I think that is one department that most coaches in the SEC are lacking in right now.
I really just wanted to know what you thought or saw that made you think he was had the best basketball IQ in the SEC. I don't agree with it and wanted to see what you had to offer in terms of defending that statement.
For the record, I think it is a tough call. I think that is one department that most coaches in the SEC are lacking in right now.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:02 pm to rockiee
quote:
2009- 2nd ranked class
None of the 3 recruits made it to SO year at UT.
quote:
2010- 23 ranked class
None of the 2 recruits made it to SO year at UT
quote:
2011- 5th ranked class
The 5* in class was ineligible Myck Kabongo for illegal contact
quote:
2012- 9th ranked class
Only 1 5* and 1 4*, the 5* Ridley was always out of shape and couldn't stay on the court.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:09 pm to mizslu314
quote:
Martin isn't a dream, hes a realistic get for Mizzou. Mizzou could get better too, but martin would be a good start.
Mizzou has played Martin every year for 10 years. He has said how much he enjoys COMO, and how familiar he is with the city. Hes more familiar with recruiting MO than he is around SC.
LULZ
Martin wanted to be closer to home (Miami) when he took this job. That's #1.
His wife and kids are entrenched here. That's #2.
He's talking about moving his mother here. That's #3.
#4 ... Mizzou cannot afford his buyout plus pay him what it would take to lure him away.
#5 ... he's being kind to CoMo when he speaks of CoMo. He's never lived there, he's only visited. He's actually lived here for five years.
#6 ... Mizzou's Athletic Department budget pales in comparison to SC's so he would require upgrades to your facilities that we already have in place, or are under construction, here. Mizzou cannot afford him.
#7 ... Martin has cultivated his recruiting base in this area throughout SC and to include NC and GA plus the Miami area and he's got the European connection as well that he has built here.
If you really believe Martin would leave for Mizzou, which is not even a lateral move, then you are dreaming.
Not to mention he enjoys the Frank Factor here. Our two winningest coaches are Frank McGuire and Frank Johnson. Frank Martin wants to pass both of them ... The Three Franks. And he loves being associated with Coach McGuire who was a hero of his.
This post was edited on 2/8/17 at 3:34 pm
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:09 pm to rockiee
quote:
Every coach that recruits at a high level has to deal with turnover from 5 stars
The difference though is that Barnes inconsistently brought them in and rarely had any stay. He regularly had less than 1-2 JR/SR on his roster and only had 1-2 5*. He didn't have UK type talent but had their youth.
If you don't reload consistently, you are going to have major issues if your only talented kids continually leave after 1 year
quote:
made you think he was had the best basketball IQ in the SEC
The truth is more what you said
quote:
I think that is one department that most coaches in the SEC are lacking in right now.
This post was edited on 2/8/17 at 3:12 pm
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:17 pm to GenesChin
quote:
The 5* in class was ineligible Myck Kabongo for illegal contact
He played in 45 games there, basically a one and done
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:30 pm to rockiee
Barnes got Mike Gottfried Syndrome at Texas. He got fat, sassy, and lazy and tried to live off his resume'. It worked for a couple of years but at a high expectation job like Texas, it caught up to him. He's doing well at UT so far because its a new challenge. You better hope he stays interested in Knoxville.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:30 pm to agswin
Martin going to Misery?
No way. Why does anyone in their right mind believe this is possible? As a sports destination, MO has unfortunately jumped the shark and Fonzie isn't coaching there either.
When Larrañaga retires at Miami, Martin probably will get the call and I could see him going there.
MO fans are going to have to take a flyer on some young buck and just hope they get lucky. It's just where the program is now.
No way. Why does anyone in their right mind believe this is possible? As a sports destination, MO has unfortunately jumped the shark and Fonzie isn't coaching there either.
When Larrañaga retires at Miami, Martin probably will get the call and I could see him going there.
MO fans are going to have to take a flyer on some young buck and just hope they get lucky. It's just where the program is now.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:35 pm to rockiee
Generally speaking though, I think Barnes problems at UT came from his inability to handle FR superstars/5*. People don't give Cal enough credit for just how good he is at handling top talent. Combine that with some fatigue and lack of drive you get the end result.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:48 pm to GenesChin
quote:
Generally speaking though, I think Barnes problems at UT came from his inability to handle FR superstars/5*. People don't give Cal enough credit for just how good he is at handling top talent. Combine that with some fatigue and lack of drive you get the end result.
I guess he just never struck me as a coach with high basketball ball IQ. Thought maybe I was missing something. I have always praised him on the available to get recruits. The Durant get was huge from D.C.
I can acknowledge that he was a victim of his own success to a certain extent. As I said earlier though, he has done better than I thought thus far so I definitely have to give him that.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 4:41 pm to CockyTime
quote:You think that a knock-down shooter would elevate South Carolina's 150th ranked offense into one that could win a title? I'm not buying it.
His style can certainly lead to titles. The only thing not making us elite right now is a knock down shooter that can create his own shot. If he finds someone like this who will buy into defense the way Notice does, this team would be very tough to beat.
Martin has had a Top 50 offense twice in his career: his first year with Kansas State (the year he lucked into Michael Beasley), and his Elite Eight year (when that last Huggins class were seniors). Even those last two tournament teams he had at Kansas State that both won a game were pretty offensively challenged.
He's just not a great offensive coach. If he lucks into another elite talent, maybe he'll win a title. If not, I think he is what he is: a coach who will have you in the postseason just about every year (whether NIT or NCAA), might get to the second weekend every once in awhile, but will never truly challenge for a title.
That sounds more than good enough for South Carolina or Missouri. I wouldn't want it at Florida.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 4:52 pm to GatorsGators
quote:
If he lucks into another elite talent, maybe he'll win a title.
If he got to an elite program than it wouldn't be that hard. Is your argument that he couldn't win a title at any school or just at USCe?
Posted on 2/8/17 at 4:58 pm to rockiee
Clearly us, and I don't diagree unless he's here for the long haul. Even then, it'd be a long shoot. Too many good programs surrounding us. Our best players have always been "diamond in the rough" types.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 5:00 pm to rockiee
quote:Mostly USCe, or any other non-blue blood school, really. I don't think a blue blood would ever touch him because of his temperament, though, so I think that argument is moot.
If he got to an elite program than it wouldn't be that hard. Is your argument that he couldn't win a title at any school or just at USCe?
Posted on 2/8/17 at 5:51 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:
He'll do a great job at Mizzou if we offer.
Frank Martin has gained a lot of grey hair during the early years of building up and trying to coach the South Carolina program. If he takes on the Mizzou job, in a couple of years he'll look like this:
This post was edited on 2/8/17 at 5:51 pm
Posted on 2/8/17 at 5:54 pm to CNB
quote:
Clearly us, and I don't diagree unless he's here for the long haul. Even then, it'd be a long shoot. Too many good programs surrounding us. Our best players since 1985 have often times been "diamond in the rough" types.
FIFY
Posted on 2/8/17 at 6:10 pm to GenesChin
quote:
It has nothing to do with identifying talent. Martin is just one of the few coaches who can take an unrefined raw athlete and develop at a high level
Any idiot can find an athlete, only Martin can regularly make that athlete an elite defender
Totally agree.
The guy coaches'em up. He really does do a great job finding players that fit his system and then bringing them along to be good players.
As he gets better and better players he'll develop better and better players ... wait, errr, hell, you know what I mean.
Not every getable player out there is going to fit Martin's style or personality.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 6:22 pm to Iron Lion
He's a great coach and they're only gonna get better.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News