Started By
Message

The truth behind Hugh Freeze's guilt - vouching for Ole Miss fans

Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:07 pm
Posted by BillyBobBlitzkrieg
Lafayette
Member since Feb 2013
1352 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:07 pm
It isn't that he was cheating.

It's that he was caught cheating and was becoming relevant. Ole Miss was beginning to give Bama fits. Saban was getting outcoached by Hugh, and it was affecting the cash cow narrative perpetuating that Saban is the GOAT coach, and we get to witness the age of his greatness. He's well connected to Mark Emmert, the president of the NCAA, and BAMA gets a slant from the SEC offices being located in Birmingham.

IMO, Hugh wasn't doing anything more than virtually every major program. Former coaches in the SEC have said there is some unspoken code. Schools expect each other to cheat, but usually do not throw stones because of M.A.D. or mutually assured destruction. It is in the same thread of logic like how every super power maintains threat of nuclear strike. It is strictly a deterrent.

Saban is one of the only coaches who can work behind the scenes to get the NCAA digging around without fear of retaliation. Saban has constantly been known for pushing the boundaries thus leading to the creation of a number of new NCAA rules directly in response to his "creative" thinking. I know while Saban was working for LSU, he was responsible for setting up the booster system that we currently use. For instance, our south florida recruiting was set up originally by Saban's booster footprint starting with Dwayne Bowe. Our booster in that area comes through nearly every recruiting class. Kevin Toliver, Pat Peterson, Dwyane Bowe, and soon to be Pat Surtain.

I know most of you will think black helicopters, and I suppose denial must be nice. All major programs use booster's to cheat. As long as it is not blatant, or you don't disrupt the order of things, then you are not gonna get ratted out.

Hugh did not get caught because he is a cheater; he is under the microscope because he was disrupting the powers that be. If left to his devices, Saban was trending toward an automatic loss every year as he couldn't outscore or contain Hugh's offense.

As an LSU fan, I support Hugh 100 percent, and I don't believe he is any more or less guilty than most if not all SEC coaches.

If you tldr as a reply, I understand. It must be difficult to blow the almighty angry midget while trying to SEC Rant.

Posted by craigbiggio
Member since Dec 2009
31805 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:08 pm to
frick
Posted by Cobrasize
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2013
49680 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:09 pm to
Posted by TigerTalker16
Columbia,MO
Member since Apr 2015
11533 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:10 pm to
I'm not reading all that shite. Have a downvote.
Posted by AgCoug
Houston
Member since Jan 2014
5857 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:11 pm to
Posted by Tdot_RiverDawg
Member since May 2015
1700 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:12 pm to
When was the last time Saban took to twitter and demanded if anyone had any violations to report to send them to Bama compliance? I'll hang up and listen...
Posted by MaroonNation
StarkVegas, Mississippi, Bitch!
Member since Nov 2010
21950 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:14 pm to
If any of that bullshite is true it could be easily proved by any lawyer with a pulse. Problem is it's 100% bullshite.
Posted by Freezus22
Da Boot
Member since Aug 2016
1609 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:17 pm to
So basically you're saying if we didn't beat Bama two years in a row that the NCAA wouldn't have been breathing down our neck?
Posted by BillyBobBlitzkrieg
Lafayette
Member since Feb 2013
1352 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

When was the last time Saban took to twitter and demanded if anyone had any violations to report to send them to Bama compliance? I'll hang up and listen...


Not saying that wasn't a grave misstep. That was just plain dumb. Saban's hands aren't clean. Bo Davis took the wrap for one of his missteps.

The man got a judge to let Cam Robinson off with a felony charge of drugs with a gun - a major offense - with the sole explanation that they shouldn't be punished because they sweat outdoors during the summer while non athletes stay inside in the AC. That is possibly the worst cover up for an under the table deal I have ever heard. And he pulled it off in Louisiana with a Louisiana judge. The guy isn't the GOAT coach - he is the best politician and strings puller. When you are set up to recruit the way he does, have officials slanted your way, get your star juniors back for their senior season, and wiggle your way out of cheating - then you are what people call Teflon dawn. Nothing sticks with him, and that's how and why he wins as consistently as he does.
Posted by Swm323
Pace,FL
Member since Mar 2013
1360 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:18 pm to
My one regret is that I have but one downvote to give
This post was edited on 5/17/17 at 3:19 pm
Posted by Vecchio Cane
Ivory Tower
Member since Jul 2016
17716 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

It must be difficult to blow the almighty angry midget while trying to SEC Rant


BRB, getting some bleach for my eyes
Posted by BillyBobBlitzkrieg
Lafayette
Member since Feb 2013
1352 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

So basically you're saying if we didn't beat Bama two years in a row that the NCAA wouldn't have been breathing down our neck?


That's exactly what I am saying. If Vanderbilt were cheating on the exact same level as Hugh and Ole Miss, but only winning one or two more games a year against mid tier teams, no one would go sniffing around there.

Has it not occurred to anyone else that as soon as Hugh was beating Saban consistently, all the sudden these violations came popping up?

I remember 4 or 5 years back, Ole Miss signing some big time OL - tackle, and Saban threatened to turn Ole Miss in for cheating because he was previously commited to Bama. Then the player posted on twitter that Bama bought him a 10K watch or something, and he took it down within 5 minutes of posting.

When players commit to Bama, they rarely decommit and sign with someone else out of fear or retribution. It's logically transparent.
Posted by BillyBobBlitzkrieg
Lafayette
Member since Feb 2013
1352 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

If any of that bull shite is true it could be easily proved by any lawyer with a pulse. Problem is it's 100% bull shite.




You have no idea how big business works. This is a continuous proxy war. The powers that be do not directly get involved. It called plausible deniability. Think outside the box, and try not to be so niave.
Posted by CrimsonCrusade
Member since Jan 2014
5144 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:27 pm to
Posted by BillyBobBlitzkrieg
Lafayette
Member since Feb 2013
1352 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

My one regret is that I have but one downvote to give


I bet I can guess what your dad's one regret would be....

quote:

Swm323
Posted by Vecchio Cane
Ivory Tower
Member since Jul 2016
17716 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

So basically you're saying if we didn't beat Bama two years in a row that the NCAA wouldn't have been breathing down our neck?

quote:

That's exactly what I am saying


So, if it can be proven that the NCAA was looking at Ole Miss before Hugh even got there, then you won't have a leg to stand on?
Posted by 19
Flux Capacitor, Fluxing
Member since Nov 2007
33161 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:28 pm to
way to troll the gumps. I give it a solid B+.

frick the midget.
Posted by Commander Data
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Dec 2016
7289 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:31 pm to
You are a real fricking genius.
Posted by BillyBobBlitzkrieg
Lafayette
Member since Feb 2013
1352 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

CrimsonCrusade


Propaganda 101 - a simple lie continuously repeated will be accepted by the masses before a complicated truth.

There are lots of behind the scenes with anything concerning big business. Booster's are comparable to lobbyists in Washington.
Posted by BillyBobBlitzkrieg
Lafayette
Member since Feb 2013
1352 posts
Posted on 5/17/17 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

So, if it can be proven that the NCAA was looking at Ole Miss before Hugh even got there, then you won't have a leg to stand on?


Depends on the definition of looking at. The point would continue to be substantiated without initiation, but with the inclusion of acceleration. If Saban were to pull strings to catalyze the process, the point would still be valid. If you can prove that one way or another, be my guest...
Page 1 2 3 4
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter