Started By
Message
The Pussification of ONCE Mizzou fans
Posted on 2/6/16 at 2:18 pm
Posted on 2/6/16 at 2:18 pm
I'm tired of these old fricks that swear they bleed black and gold but follow up a protest they don't like with a protest of their own thinking they are coming out as the big man on top.
Look. Not one of those protesters give a flying frick if you support Mizzou sports anymore. The fact you're going to let 18-19 year olds get under your skin to the point you quit supporting the college you love, attended or whatever the case may be, over a little minority group shows that those individuals are pussies.
Mizzou's fanbase has been weeded out of their weakest links. Don't let the door hit you on the back side.
Look. Not one of those protesters give a flying frick if you support Mizzou sports anymore. The fact you're going to let 18-19 year olds get under your skin to the point you quit supporting the college you love, attended or whatever the case may be, over a little minority group shows that those individuals are pussies.
Mizzou's fanbase has been weeded out of their weakest links. Don't let the door hit you on the back side.
Posted on 2/6/16 at 2:22 pm to ChaseMizzou
Have an upvote OP. Old people are indeed bitches.
Posted on 2/6/16 at 2:25 pm to ChaseMizzou
It's the right move, you're the pussy.
Posted on 2/6/16 at 2:27 pm to TigerBornTigerBred
They're pussies just like the original protestors.
Posted on 2/6/16 at 2:31 pm to ChaseMizzou
No, you seem to be the only one whining like a little pussy because you're not happy the alumni aren't going along with this sham. You got a little sand in your vagina?
Posted on 2/6/16 at 2:32 pm to ChaseMizzou
quote:
I'm tired of these old fricks
I see ... and I raise you. The head shrinkers have spoken ... the real problem with what ails Mizzou, and this country, would in fact appear to be you and your ilk.
quote:
The left’s dismissal of old people is much more than another left-wing ad hominem attack. Therefore, to understand it is to understand much of what animates leftism.
As a rule, the left rejects the old.
The left’s attack on teaching the works of “Dead White European Males” was one such example. It infuriated the left that Shakespeare was studied so much more than, let us say, living Guatemalan playwrights. As a result, one can now obtain a college degree in English — let alone every other liberal arts department — without having taken a course in Shakespeare.
So, too, in art and music, the new is almost always favored over the old. New composers and artists — no matter how untalented — are studied as much as or more than the great masters of old. And the old standards of excellence are neglected in favor of the latest avant-garde experimentation.
Rejection of the old is a reason the left has contempt for the Bible. To progressives, the idea of having 2,000 and 3,000-year-old texts guide a person’s behavior today is ludicrous.
Low regard for the old is also a major factor in the left’s dismissal of the Founders and of the original intent of the Constitution. Talk about “old white males,” the Founders are white males who are now over 200-years-old. What could they possibly have known or understood that a progressive living today does not know more about or understand better?
What, then, is at the core of the left’s contempt for the old, and its celebration of the new and of change?
There are two primary answers.
One is the yearning for utopia. Since Marx, the left has sought utopia in this world. And that means constantly transforming every aspect of society. As then-Senator Barack Obama said prior to the 2008 election: “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”
By definition, those who seek to transform consider the old essentially worthless.
The other answer is self-esteem. The left began the self-esteem movement in large measure because of its own high self-esteem. Those on the left are certain that they are smarter, kinder, more moral and more compassionate than — in every way superior to — their opponents.
That is a major reason for the left’s problem with the old: If the old is great, then they and their new ideas are probably not that great.
Just about everyone who is not on the cultural left knows that all the great masters were incomparably superior to Jackson Pollock and other 20th-centuries artists who produced meaningless and talentless art. And because there are so few artists at any time who measure up to the old standards (standards that are synonymous with standards of excellence), the old standards have simply been abandoned.
This applies equally to morality. The left doesn’t want to be bound or answerable to a higher moral authority. Rather, one’s heart and reason are the best moral guides. Here, too, the old codes, especially as embodied in traditional religion, must be overthrown.
Prior to the ascendance of the left, it was assumed that the old had more wisdom than the young. Indeed, even every leftist I have asked, “Are you wiser today than 20 years ago?” has answered in the affirmative.
Nevertheless the left has transformed “old” — a title that commanded respect in every civilization prior to the pre-1960s West — into a pejorative.
As a result we live in the age of new music, new art, new families, new morality, new education, and now new marriage. If you think all these are good, then “old white males,” like almost everything else old, do indeed constitute a threat. If you think the left’s belief in “new” and “change” hurts society, “old” sounds good
This post was edited on 2/6/16 at 2:35 pm
Posted on 2/6/16 at 2:35 pm to Theoldgraycoat
You dumbfrick, if you can't see it is a response thread to all these pussy former Mizzou fans then I don't know what to tell yeah.
This is my way to tell you that we, the ones that don't let a little minority group get under our skin, don't give a frick that they are now FORMER Mizzou fans.
This is my way to tell you that we, the ones that don't let a little minority group get under our skin, don't give a frick that they are now FORMER Mizzou fans.
This post was edited on 2/6/16 at 2:37 pm
Posted on 2/6/16 at 3:30 pm to ChaseMizzou
All this because some Mizzou fans have changed their "favorite team" logo...
Posted on 2/6/16 at 3:52 pm to Master of Sinanju
As one thread was made by a pussy Mizzou used to be about all this irrelevant shite that didn't happen on the field.
Posted on 2/6/16 at 3:57 pm to ChaseMizzou
quote:
The fact you're going to let 18-19 year olds get under your skin to the point you quit supporting the college you love, attended or whatever the case may be, over a little minority group shows that those individuals are pussies.
Just so I understand. If you think something is wrong and you are a student and protest, then you are strong. But if you think something is wrong and you are NOT a student you are weak?
Ooook.
Posted on 2/6/16 at 4:18 pm to ChaseMizzou
Upvoted. Surely there is enough room on the Alabama bandwagon for them.
Posted on 2/6/16 at 4:41 pm to DawgsLife
No, both are as weak as the other.
Posted on 2/6/16 at 4:45 pm to ChaseMizzou
quote:
No, both are as weak as the other.
and you protesting about their right to protest, makes you just as dumb as them, amarite?
Posted on 2/6/16 at 4:52 pm to Pigfeet
How am I protesting?
I'm just calling out their dumbfrickery. They have a right to be a dumbfrick, and it is in no way changing any of my behaviors. Just calling them out.
I'm just calling out their dumbfrickery. They have a right to be a dumbfrick, and it is in no way changing any of my behaviors. Just calling them out.
Posted on 2/6/16 at 5:11 pm to ChaseMizzou
Hey, I don't really care. I just love watching the dumbass liberal Curators, Admin and Coaches get eaten alive by a more liberal movement.
Each group is getting everything they deserve.
Each group is getting everything they deserve.
Posted on 2/6/16 at 5:35 pm to Pigfeet
You're an idiot dude. Let's keep it to sports.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News