Started By
Message
The Joker Tape - Yes it is bad news
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:20 pm
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:20 pm
The existence of the noted tape recording was verified by Barney Farrar's lawyer today in his response. If the tape is brought forward and made public in the process of presenting it to the COI, then one certain State player's collegiate activity may be over. It will also affect the punishment phase of the Ole Miss NCAA violations.
21
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:21 pm to Powell
Just wait until The Riddler tape is revealed
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:22 pm to Powell
what is the joker tape
why is it bad news
who is the State player
what impact on the punishment phase
why is it bad news
who is the State player
what impact on the punishment phase
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:23 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
what is the joker tape
why is it bad news
who is the State player
what impact on the punishment phase
google Leo Lewis aka "Student Athlete 39" in the NCAA documents.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:26 pm to deeprig9
quote:
google Leo Lewis aka "Student Athlete 39" in the NCAA documents.
I get this image for some reason
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:29 pm to Powell
quote:
Powell
quote:
It will also affect the punishment phase of the Ole Miss NCAA violations.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:34 pm to Powell
quote:
The existence of the noted tape recording was verified by Barney Farrar's lawyer today in his response.
Citation needed. He didn't say one word about the ghost recording in his statement after Ole Miss released their response to the NCAA,
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:36 pm to JustGetItRight
quote:
Citation needed. He didn't say one word about the ghost recording in his statement after Ole Miss released their response to the NCAA,
This.
Powell is trying to deflect.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:37 pm to Powell
You're really dumb if you think you can just transfer your issues to Mississippi State.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:41 pm to The Winner
quote:
You're really dumb if you think you can just transfer your issues to Mississippi State.
It's fascinating how many people think that court is like an episode of Matlock
New accusations aren't made and the mystery isn't solved in the courtroom
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:43 pm to Powell
Post less?
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:43 pm to Vecchio Cane
Not sure if this tape exists or not, but if State or LSU is named by the mother in it and one of these schools beats Bama this year, this will become an issue.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:45 pm to Powell
wasn't he granted immunity by the NCAA? not sure why a tape would change that
I also doubt the NCAA ruins the kid's career before it even starts. They're going to present him as a victim in all of this
I also doubt the NCAA ruins the kid's career before it even starts. They're going to present him as a victim in all of this
This post was edited on 6/9/17 at 1:49 pm
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:46 pm to Powell
Oh ok
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:49 pm to rebsfan10
Sure it exists, It was validated in the response today: Here is the statement that mentioned it: "The recording of a phone call between (blank) mother and Farrar indicate that other (blank) schools were offering (blank) money.90 The realty is (blank) probably accepted money from multiple people and multiple schools. He admitted to asking for money from schools knowing he had no intention of ever attending that school.91"
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:51 pm to Powell
So basically like Eric Dickerson getting a car from A&M and then going to SMU. How did that one play out?
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:52 pm to Powell
quote:
The realty is (blank) probably accepted money
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:53 pm to lsufball19
3. Why is it referred to as "limited" immunity?
The term limited immunity refers to protections afforded to an individual who may have
committed violations of NCAA legislation. Limited immunity protects the individual from
consequences resulting from violations of NCAA legislation; however, it does not protect the
individual from action(s) that could be taken by the individual's institution or any other entity.
Additionally, limited immunity does not apply to an individual's involvement in violations not
reported to the NCAA enforcement staff or to future violations of NCAA legislation committed
by the individual. Finally, limited immunity does not apply to the institution's responsibility
for the violations that occurred. Hence the term limited immunity
10. Can a grant of limited immunity be revoked?
Yes. The chair of the Committee on Infractions may revoke a grant of limited immunity. If the
chair is unavailable, the vice chair may act in the chair's absence and revoke the grant of limited
immunity.
13. When can a grant of limited immunity be revoked?
At any time during the pendency of the investigation, during the processing of the case or at a
hearing before the Committee on Infractions.
14. Can the Committee on Infractions revoke a grant of limited immunity independent of a
request for revocation by the enforcement staff?
Yes. As the grantor of limited immunity, the Committee on Infractions may revoke limited
immunity on its own.
16. What does it mean if a grant of limited immunity is revoked?
The enforcement staff may bring the underlying violation(s) of NCAA legislation against the
individual pursuant to the notice procedures set forth in NCAA Bylaw 19.7. The enforcement
staff may also allege an NCAA Bylaw 10.1 unethical conduct violation against the individual.
18. Does a grant of limited immunity to an individual protect that individual's current
(and/or prior) institution?
No. Limited immunity protects individuals, not institutions. For example, in the scenario
provided above, the grant of limited immunity protected Doe from NCAA consequences, such
going through the NCAA student-athlete reinstatement process, for his involvement in the
$10,000 impermissible benefit. However, Doe's grant of limited immunity does not apply to
State University or Smith (since he was not offered his own grant of limited immunity).
Therefore, the enforcement staff could still allege the underlying violation in a notice of
allegations, and the institution and Smith, if named as an at-risk individual, could still be
subject to NCAA penalties, including that Doe participated while ineligible (if applicable).
NCAA Immunity PDF
The term limited immunity refers to protections afforded to an individual who may have
committed violations of NCAA legislation. Limited immunity protects the individual from
consequences resulting from violations of NCAA legislation; however, it does not protect the
individual from action(s) that could be taken by the individual's institution or any other entity.
Additionally, limited immunity does not apply to an individual's involvement in violations not
reported to the NCAA enforcement staff or to future violations of NCAA legislation committed
by the individual. Finally, limited immunity does not apply to the institution's responsibility
for the violations that occurred. Hence the term limited immunity
10. Can a grant of limited immunity be revoked?
Yes. The chair of the Committee on Infractions may revoke a grant of limited immunity. If the
chair is unavailable, the vice chair may act in the chair's absence and revoke the grant of limited
immunity.
13. When can a grant of limited immunity be revoked?
At any time during the pendency of the investigation, during the processing of the case or at a
hearing before the Committee on Infractions.
14. Can the Committee on Infractions revoke a grant of limited immunity independent of a
request for revocation by the enforcement staff?
Yes. As the grantor of limited immunity, the Committee on Infractions may revoke limited
immunity on its own.
16. What does it mean if a grant of limited immunity is revoked?
The enforcement staff may bring the underlying violation(s) of NCAA legislation against the
individual pursuant to the notice procedures set forth in NCAA Bylaw 19.7. The enforcement
staff may also allege an NCAA Bylaw 10.1 unethical conduct violation against the individual.
18. Does a grant of limited immunity to an individual protect that individual's current
(and/or prior) institution?
No. Limited immunity protects individuals, not institutions. For example, in the scenario
provided above, the grant of limited immunity protected Doe from NCAA consequences, such
going through the NCAA student-athlete reinstatement process, for his involvement in the
$10,000 impermissible benefit. However, Doe's grant of limited immunity does not apply to
State University or Smith (since he was not offered his own grant of limited immunity).
Therefore, the enforcement staff could still allege the underlying violation in a notice of
allegations, and the institution and Smith, if named as an at-risk individual, could still be
subject to NCAA penalties, including that Doe participated while ineligible (if applicable).
NCAA Immunity PDF
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:53 pm to lsufball19
Yes, the student-athlete was granted limited immunity. The immunity only covers the activity between Ole Miss and the student-athlete. Not other schools and other violations.
Posted on 6/9/17 at 1:55 pm to Powell
The main takeaway is that Student Athlete 39 appears more and more unreliable as information comes out.
The COI may disagree with investigators' contention that he was 100% credible - he appears to be a untrustworthy clown the more you read into his dealings.
The COI may disagree with investigators' contention that he was 100% credible - he appears to be a untrustworthy clown the more you read into his dealings.
Page 1 of 6
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News