Started By
Message

The FBI investigation: where is a federal crime involved?

Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:59 pm
Posted by matthew25
Member since Jun 2012
9425 posts
Posted on 9/28/17 at 11:59 pm
I want to give the math wiz next door $25k because he wins regional competitions. I want him to work for me when he finishes college.

Why is this a crime?

Hope the attorneys on the site can educate me.
Posted by Big4Dawg
Member since May 2013
1058 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 12:02 am to
I don’t understand this either.
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
38862 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 12:02 am to
Someone said yesterday that some of the money floating g around out there came from a Federal Grant.
Posted by UASports23
Member since Nov 2009
24344 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 12:03 am to
quote:

I want to give the math wiz next door $25k


Pimping your sister out until you reach your $25K goal is illegal. You hick.

Signed,
SECr Attorney of Law.
Posted by dbeck
Member since Nov 2014
29449 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 12:04 am to
If you have evidence of a federal crime then send it to the FBI, otherwise please stop slandering these fine, young coaches.
Posted by randomways
North Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
12988 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 12:13 am to
The federal grant thing mentioned above, plus it's a pretty good bet that quite a few of these transactions crossed state lines, which makes it a federal issue.
Posted by UASports23
Member since Nov 2009
24344 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 12:14 am to
I would imagine this.

The General Federal Bribery Statute punishes the offence of bribery in the U.S[iii]. According to 18 USCS prec § 201(b).

Commercial bribery is the giving or offering to give, directly or indirectly, anything of value to any private agent, employee, or fiduciary, without the knowledge and consent of the principal or employer, with the intent to influence such agent’s, employee’s, or fiduciary’s action in relation to the principal’s or employer’s affairs.

Additionally, the Travel Act provides that whoever travels in interstate or foreign commerce or uses any facility in interstate or foreign commerce with the intent to promote, establish, carry on, or facilitate the promotion, establishment, or carrying on of any unlawful activity and thereafter performs or attempts to perform any unlawful activity shall be guilty of a crime[iv]. Unlawful activity includes bribery in violation of the laws of the United States[v].
Posted by matthew25
Member since Jun 2012
9425 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 12:43 am to
What federal grant? This is shoe company money going to a family to deliver the student.

Is this similar to Reggie Bush case? Didn't Reggie select another NFL agent, and the cuck agent turned him in to the NCAA?

Sure, this is a NCAA case (voluntary association), but not a crime.

Posted by Armchair_QB
Member since Aug 2013
1512 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 12:48 am to
I'm guessing very little of this money was declared income so you can add tax fraud to the charges.
Posted by The_Joker
Winter Park, Fl
Member since Jan 2013
16316 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 1:06 am to
quote:

I'm guessing very little of this money was declared income so you can add tax fraud to the charges.


I’m betting on literally none. It’s shocking so many people don’t realize you can’t move large sums of money without the IRS at least checking it out.
This post was edited on 9/29/17 at 1:09 am
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 1:14 am to
quote:

You are missing the point.

Scholarships are "on the record".

To keep money changing hands away from the NCAA, you also have to keep it away from the government.

Government does not get it's taxes. Government gives grants to people who would not qualify if they reported their Nike income. Hence, fraud.
Posted by cave canem
pullarius dominus
Member since Oct 2012
12186 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 1:38 am to
long read but pretty well spells it all out

LINK
Posted by TOSOV
Member since Jan 2016
8922 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 4:07 am to
quote:

I’m betting on literally none. It’s shocking so many people don’t realize you can’t move large sums of money without the IRS at least checking it out.


Yeah it's just not shocking to me anymore that people don't realize these kind of things. Mostly by fans that look at ncaa schools like pro teams.

A msg will be sent when these players, and there parents start to get charged. And/or they start getting the irs knocking on their door asking for back taxes. If that doesn't occur then this kind of stuff won't stop.
Posted by Columbia
Land of the Yuppies
Member since Mar 2016
3132 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 4:55 am to
Nobody really expects Ole Miss fans to be able to differentiate between what’s right and wrong.
Posted by artompkins
Orange Beach, Al
Member since May 2010
5613 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 5:07 am to
Just a few are the bribary and corruption charges, tax evasion and money laundering. What you described is not what happened. You are not a corporation or someone entrusted with young people's best interests and leading them off to other criminals. This all started out as an SEC investigation until the pink slime involved turned rat on all of this.
Posted by Dday63
Member since Sep 2014
2297 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 5:52 am to
quote:

Commercial bribery is the giving or offering to give, directly or indirectly, anything of value to any private agent, employee, or fiduciary, without the knowledge and consent of the principal or employer, with the intent to influence such agent’s, employee’s, or fiduciary’s action in relation to the principal’s or employer’s affairs.


A coach is not an "agent, employee or fiduciary" of a player. Further, if he shared some of the money with the players, then it seems he may have informed them of the financial relationship so that he hasn't violated the statute at all.

What he did was unethical and should cost him his job, and if he gave money to players then it was a clear NCAA violation, but I'm still not sold on it being a crime.
Posted by cave canem
pullarius dominus
Member since Oct 2012
12186 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 6:24 am to
quote:

but I'm still not sold on it being a crime.



Give her hell then, let us know how it works out for you
Posted by allin2010
Auburn
Member since Aug 2011
18150 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 6:47 am to
The attorneys will argue that it is not a crime. But the crime is that Persons accepted a bribe (commission/finders fee) to steer player/people to a financial advisor which compromised and hurt Auburn (victim). Since Auburn receives federal grant money the crime was against Auburn.

In the Louisville case there were no charges YET, not sure why. Same goes for Bama.

Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
25871 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 6:53 am to
quote:

What he did was unethical and should cost him his job, and if he gave money to players then it was a clear NCAA violation, but I'm still not sold on it being a crime.

They have the Auburn coach on tape lying about who the financial advisor had represented and their relationship, among other things. That's fraud.

The shoe companies paying a kid isn't a crime in itself. The crimes come when they take steps to conceal that payment to preserve eligibility. That's when you get into money laundering and tax evasion.
This post was edited on 9/29/17 at 6:54 am
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
32202 posts
Posted on 9/29/17 at 6:54 am to
quote:

What federal grant? This is shoe company money going to a family to deliver the student.

Schools that accept federal grant money (which is probably all especially public colleges/universities) gives the FBI jurisdiction in these matters. There are all kinds of problems if this stuff went down as it seems; bribery, SEC fraud, tax evasion, conspiracy, and I am sure tons of others that haven't been mentioned yet.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter