Started By
Message
Targeting out of control
Posted on 12/20/16 at 6:49 pm
Posted on 12/20/16 at 6:49 pm
# 4 for Western Kentucky being kicked out of the game is total bull shite.
13
Posted on 12/20/16 at 6:50 pm to CrimsonBoz
Too bad he doesn't play for Bama
Posted on 12/20/16 at 6:50 pm to CrimsonBoz
wrong board.
Posted on 12/20/16 at 6:51 pm to Chazzy McRamzee
What should it be in?
Posted on 12/20/16 at 6:51 pm to CrimsonBoz
Agree I have already lost interest in the NFL for too many rules and bogus personal fouls. Praying the NCAA does not do the same but bullshite like that makes me wonder.
Posted on 12/20/16 at 6:53 pm to CrimsonBoz
I agree, they need to use some common sense on some of these calls. It's ridiculous
Posted on 12/20/16 at 6:54 pm to CrimsonBoz
quote:
# 4 for Western Kentucky being kicked out of the game is total bull shite
If it was a Bama player doing the targeting he wouldn't have even been called for a penalty.
We have seen that on multiple occasions this year.
Posted on 12/20/16 at 6:57 pm to boweswi05
Posted on 12/20/16 at 7:00 pm to boweswi05
quote:
If it was a Bama player doing the targeting he wouldn't have even been called for a penalty.
We have seen that on multiple occasions this year.
Never stop melting. 21-0, 21-17, 38-17, 20-13, 30-16, 10-0, EABOD, DIAF, GFY.
Posted on 12/20/16 at 7:01 pm to boweswi05
quote:
If it was a Bama player doing the targeting he wouldn't have even been called for a penalty. We have seen that on multiple occasions this year
Cool the more downvotes I get means you guys realize what I am saying is true.
Tough if you don't like it.
Posted on 12/20/16 at 7:01 pm to boweswi05
LSU fans are the biggest fricking crybabies.
Posted on 12/20/16 at 7:02 pm to boweswi05
Wut?
Posted on 12/20/16 at 7:10 pm to biclops
quote:
Never stop melting. 21-0, 21-17, 38-17, 20-13, 30-16, 10-0, EABOD, DIAF, GFY.
Stay on topic and quit deflecting.
We know all of the above. SO quit trying to look like a hero and comment on the topic or move along.
Posted on 12/20/16 at 7:17 pm to CrimsonBoz
There should be two levels of targeting if it's going to exist. If you don't launch head first, it shouldn't be an ejection but could still be a penalty.
Posted on 12/20/16 at 7:18 pm to TomRollTideRitter
Totally agree and so does D Howard.
Posted on 12/20/16 at 7:27 pm to CrimsonBoz
I am of the opinion that most of these targeting calls should be a personal foul, 15 yard penalty. Nothing more, nothing less. The only real targeting that should warrant an ejection is on punt returns when the gunner destroys the guy about to catch the ball (see Arkansas thug at Vandy a few years ago).
Posted on 12/20/16 at 7:32 pm to boweswi05
quote:
Stay on topic
Irony.
Posted on 12/20/16 at 7:34 pm to biclops
quote:
Irony.
Read the topic read my posts and get back to me Gump.
Posted on 12/20/16 at 7:37 pm to boweswi05
quote:
Read the topic read my posts and get back to me Gump.
Your most on-topic post was transparently manufactured to be so, and barely tangentially so, in order to get in one more little complaint about daddy bama. So, again, you telling me to stay on topic is ironic.
But by all means, please continue.
This post was edited on 12/20/16 at 7:43 pm
Posted on 12/20/16 at 7:59 pm to TomRollTideRitter
quote:
There should be two levels of targeting if it's going to exist. If you don't launch head first, it shouldn't be an ejection but could still be a penalty.
I agree. It was a very questionable borderline call.
It looked like the receiver drooped down some just before he got hit and that the tackler did not appear to launch, lead with the crown (top) of his helmet or target the head/neck area, but could not prevent it from being a helmet-to-helmet hit.
I think perhaps they upheld the targeting call because the receiver didn't see the hit coming and was therefore deemed defenseless.
This post was edited on 12/21/16 at 9:48 am
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News