Started By
Message
3
Posted on 1/21/13 at 2:30 pm to Bob Ag
quote:
The point is, you can't just dismiss the 58-10 arse whipping just because you didn't like the head coach your administration picked.
This is a valid point. More to the stupidity that is Arkansas. They hired, as a flagship, a candidate that would have been turned down by almost any D1 school.
You had a bad coach which was your own faul. We had to pay for our sins of Fran and Sherman.
Posted on 1/21/13 at 2:30 pm to bpfergu
quote:
JLS took a consensus preseason top-10 team with 2 Heisman-contenders, one of the best WRs in the conference, and an intact coaching staff and led us to a 4-8 record.
Sherman took a consensus preseason top 10 team (favored in all but one game), with the best WR in school history (then), a QB who'd go on to be a top ten pick, a RB who'd get drafted, 2 future First Team All-Americans on the OL, and an intact coaching staff and led us to a 6-6 record.
quote:
Sherman >>>>>> JLS
So no.
This post was edited on 1/21/13 at 2:32 pm
Posted on 1/21/13 at 2:43 pm to DWag215
quote:
Winning back-to-back-to-back national championships in both men's and women's track and field seems pretty hard accomplish.
Think that is hard? Imagine winning back-to-back-to-back-to-back-to-back-to-back-to-back-to-back-to-back-to-back-to-back-to-back national championships in men's outdoor track
or how about back-to-back-to-back-to-back-to-back-to-back-to-back-to-back national championships in men's indoor track
or how about I'll make it even easier and just challenge you to back-to-back-to-back-back national championships in men's cross country.
quote:
The point is, you can't just dismiss the 58-10 arse whipping just because you didn't like the head coach your administration picked.
Which is the same as me saying you can't dismiss that the first time you've beaten us in 20 years came when we didn't have a coach, and that that doesn't magically make your program better than ours.
quote:
Sherman took a consensus preseason top 10 team (favored in all but one game), with the best WR in school history (then), a QB who'd go on to be a top ten pick, a RB who'd get drafted, 2 future First Team All-Americans on the OL, and an intact coaching staff and led us to a 6-6 record.
6-6 > 4-8
You were also leading in most, if not all of those games. We just got flat-out decimated in most.
quote:
Sherman >>>>>> JLS
So unequivocally yes.
This post was edited on 1/21/13 at 2:47 pm
Posted on 1/21/13 at 2:45 pm to DWag215
enjoy 3rd or 4th place in conference.
Posted on 1/21/13 at 2:47 pm to DWag215
your team and school is garbage
learn to have some dignity and humility when you join a conference so much above your school
learn to have some dignity and humility when you join a conference so much above your school
Posted on 1/21/13 at 2:52 pm to Ray Zorback
You forgot to mention you lost to LSU's women, home of 25 national team titles, 24 SEC champs, 110+ national champs, etc.
Nah, you're not the class of the SEC in either men or women's track. Elite? absolutely, but so are LSU, Arkansas, Florida, and Tennessee
Nah, you're not the class of the SEC in either men or women's track. Elite? absolutely, but so are LSU, Arkansas, Florida, and Tennessee
Posted on 1/21/13 at 2:57 pm to Ray Zorback
quote:
learn to have some dignity and humility
at some random piggie talking about dignity or humility, as if these are common traits coming from Arkansas fans that post on the Rant. What do Hog fans know about these concepts?
Posted on 1/21/13 at 2:59 pm to bpfergu
quote:
Which is the same as me saying you can't dismiss that the first time you've beaten us in 20 years came when we didn't have a coach, and that that doesn't magically make your program better than ours.
I love this one, but seriously, we are 3-3 in the last 22 years.
Dont shite your pants.
Posted on 1/21/13 at 3:02 pm to Bob Ag
quote:
I love this one, but seriously, we are 3-3 in the last 22 years.
Dont shite your pants.
The simple fact of the matter is that we are a historically better program than you in football, basketball, and track.
Posted on 1/21/13 at 3:04 pm to bpfergu
quote:
You were also leading in most, if not all of those games. We just got flat-out decimated in most
The fact that we held sizeable leads deep into 5 of our 6 losses only accentuates Sherman's shitty coaching. He had to actually overcome the leads A&M's surplus of talent provided him. It just took more than a half of play before Sherman could successfully steal defeat from the jaws of victory.
That you were "decimated" in many games this season--just one removed from a very successful one--points clearly to two things: Arkansas' crappy talent (no surprise there) and BP's genius.
But even if we were to assume the above is wrong, in no way does 2 more victories "unequivocally" mean that Sherman is a better coach than JLS, much less significantly better.
This post was edited on 1/21/13 at 3:09 pm
Posted on 1/21/13 at 3:09 pm to ImperialPalace
winnning back to back to back national championships in men's track isn't that impressive. we did that a few times during one of our runs. we have 40 titles after all.
Posted on 1/21/13 at 3:26 pm to Bob Ag
Baiters baiting baiters....circle of life or circle jerk? This could go on for days.
Posted on 1/21/13 at 3:27 pm to DWag215
quote:
The fact that we held sizeable leads deep into 5 of our 6 losses only accentuates Sherman's shitty coaching. He had to actually overcome the leads A&M's surplus of talent provided him. It just took more than a half of play before Sherman could successfully steal defeat from the jaws of victory.
So let me get this straight: you are trying to argue that having a lead going late into the fourth quarter symbolizes WORSE coaching than being down by 4 TDs going into the fourth quarter? Hysterical. Absolutely hyserical.
quote:
That you were "decimated" in many games this season--just one removed from a very successful one--points clearly to two things: Arkansas' crappy talent (no surprise there) and BP's genius.
Ironic coming from a program that has been dominated by Arkansas historically.
So basically, if A&M doesn't do well it is because of coaching but if Arkansas doesn't do well it is because of lack of talent? Am I understanding that correctly?
quote:
But even if we were to assume the above is wrong, in no way does 2 more victories "unequivocally" mean that Sherman is a better coach than JLS, much less significantly better.
And now you are saying that a coach who wins more isn't the better coach? You Aggies truly are unbelievable sometimes.
Posted on 1/21/13 at 3:28 pm to Bob Ag
quote:
Wrong again. A&M has more all time wins and a better win percentage all time in football than you.
41-25-3 is all I need to hear. We are a better program than you. DWI.
Posted on 1/21/13 at 3:32 pm to oklahogjr
quote:But winning back-to-back-to-back championships in both men's AND women's track and field is impressive.
winnning back to back to back national championships in men's track isn't that impressive.
Never in the history of man had it been done before.
Posted on 1/21/13 at 3:35 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
winnning back to back to back national championships in men's track isn't that impressive. we did that a few times during one of our runs. we have 40 titles after all.
Pretty sure three-peating in both men's and women's track at the same time is not something Arkansas has ever done...since it's only been done once.
Posted on 1/21/13 at 3:37 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
Pretty sure three-peating in both men's and women's track at the same time is not something Arkansas has ever done...since it's only been done once.
Track
Arkansas
19 Mens' Indoor National Championships
10 Mens' Outdoor National Championships
11 Mens' Cross Country National Championships
Aggies
3 Mens' Outdoor National Championships
3 Womens' Outdoor National championships (lol)
You got a long way to go, Aggies.
Posted on 1/21/13 at 3:37 pm to Marty McFrat
What's "track"?
Page 5 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News