Started By
Message
locked post

Sure You Wanna Speed It Up? Faster Offenses Lead To Weaker Defenses In The SEC

Posted on 6/23/13 at 10:03 pm
Posted by Gardevoir
Member since Jun 2013
1880 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 10:03 pm
This was an interesting read. Do you agree? Look at Oregon last season. Discuss.

LINK /
Posted by TotalRebel
Member since Jan 2013
5886 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 10:04 pm to
SHMEEGLE
Posted by PrivatePublic
Member since Nov 2012
17848 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 10:04 pm to
go back in your pokeball
Posted by gnarkill1529
Alabama
Member since Jun 2011
4639 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 10:05 pm to
summary? tl;dr
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
139677 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 10:05 pm to
McRibs
Posted by bona fide
Burma
Member since Jun 2010
8972 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 10:09 pm to
Didn't read, but how many HUNH offenses have won a National Title?
Posted by AllBamaDoesIsWin
Member since Dec 2011
26725 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 10:10 pm to
Bama and UGA could both have a top five offense (maybe not statistically) this year, and neither play pussy HUNH ball.
Posted by nc14
La Jolla
Member since Jan 2012
28193 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 10:13 pm to
It is a sign of desparation. Run and gun, no huddle, hurry up are all variations of short term success gimmicks.
Posted by hawgfaninc
https://youtu.be/torc9P4-k5A
Member since Nov 2011
46273 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 10:14 pm to
quote:

Discuss.

nah
Posted by DCRebel
An office somewhere
Member since Aug 2009
17644 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 10:14 pm to
quote:

Didn't read, but how many HUNH offenses have won a National Title?



Auburn and Oregon ran hurry ups when they met in the BCSNCG.
Posted by Doresrules
Dallas, Tx
Member since Dec 2012
4450 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 10:15 pm to
I don't care what offense you run, better players, better coaches usually win.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58028 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 10:16 pm to
quote:



But these numbers are hard to argue with on the whole. The more up-tempo an SEC team goes on offense, the less effective it will likely be on defense. Conversely, the slower a team plays on offense, the better its chances of playing well on defense.


This is wrong and all the evidence I need is from watching Fran's last few years at A&M.

We played a slow paced, run based offense. The defensive numbers looked like they improved under Gary Darnell but in reality they could never get important stops or hold anyone on 3rd down.

If you have good talent and they are coached well the D will be good. The speed of your offense has little to do with it.

The problem with the formula MrSEC is using is they are assuming more yards and points given up = a worse defense. By pure numbers one could argue that but if you actually watch the games? Not so much.

If you want to see a better measure of a team's defensive capabilities you need to look at their 3rd down defense. Yards and points are ultimately meaningless when you can toss up 35+ points a game.
This post was edited on 6/23/13 at 10:18 pm
Posted by BamaStud
Memphis
Member since Nov 2011
238 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 10:17 pm to
Didn't read, but how many HUNH offenses have won a National Title?

When they did, they were SEC. Can't skirt the defense part of the equation.

SEC.
Posted by jbond
Atlanta
Member since Jun 2012
4938 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 10:31 pm to
quote:

When they did, they were SEC. Can't skirt the defense part of the equation.

Posted by Cockopotamus
Member since Jan 2013
15736 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 10:31 pm to
So defenses that spend more time on the field play worse because of fatigue?

What a revolutionary thought
This post was edited on 6/23/13 at 10:34 pm
Posted by Nguyening
SEMO
Member since Jun 2013
9057 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 10:34 pm to
quote:

Bama and UGA could both have a top five offense (maybe not statistically) this year, and neither play pussy HUNH ball.


***** HUNH ball? Because they don't huddle they are less manly? You can hurry up no huddle and run 10 straight draw plays, the point is limiting defensive substitutions and exploiting the weakness on the field.


Offensive players typically move a bit better/more endurance so defenses get gassed. It's actually a really good strategy, air raid, pro style or whatever.

It has 0 effect on quality of defense. It hurts your def stats bc more possessions = more yards and maybe more points...
Posted by harmonics
Mars Hotel
Member since Jan 2010
18611 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 10:37 pm to
Boobs?
Posted by Cockopotamus
Member since Jan 2013
15736 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 10:37 pm to
quote:

Nguyening


You should stick to basketball.

The issue is whether HUNH offenses affect the quality of their own teams defense.
Posted by dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
Dystopia (but well cared for)
Member since Mar 2012
25235 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 10:40 pm to
Any statisticians on board? It looks to me the author is just dividing number of snaps by possession time. It's a mathematical exercise. I've watched Chip Kellys' version a few times. Sometimes he'll run an actual hurry up. Sometimes it's simply a no-huddle, calling the play at the line, to disallow defensive substitutions.

This article looks like a rehash of 'statistics mean whatever you want them to mean'. Balding men have a higher incidence of heart attack. Has nothing to do with hair, balding men tend to be older, therefore higher incidence of heart attack.
Posted by dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
Dystopia (but well cared for)
Member since Mar 2012
25235 posts
Posted on 6/23/13 at 10:45 pm to
quote:

The issue is whether HUNH offenses affect the quality of their own teams defense.

If it's actual hurry-up at practice it would probably be beneficial. The guys will definitely be in shape.
Page 1 2 3 4
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter