Started By
Message
Stidham 114th in QB rating per ESPN
Posted on 9/10/17 at 11:31 am
Posted on 9/10/17 at 11:31 am
Posted on 9/10/17 at 11:33 am to BamaNatureBoy
Wow. Bowl Jackson all but guaranteed that he was the best in the SEC. Come to think of it, every barner here drank the Kool-aid.
Posted on 9/10/17 at 11:34 am to Commander Data
How does this affect his Heisman chances?
Posted on 9/10/17 at 11:35 am to BamaNatureBoy
I see Mond and Zaire there too
Posted on 9/10/17 at 11:35 am to Commander Data
He had his issues but I don't think any prototypical passer would ever succeed in Malzahn's offense.
Maybe at Tulsa ten years ago, but he is at the highest level of football now and was totally and absolutely figured out three years ago.
He's done.
Maybe at Tulsa ten years ago, but he is at the highest level of football now and was totally and absolutely figured out three years ago.
He's done.
This post was edited on 9/10/17 at 11:36 am
Posted on 9/10/17 at 11:38 am to BamaNatureBoy
Etling #11, you don't say
Posted on 9/10/17 at 11:47 am to BamaNatureBoy
Jalen Hurts @16 and no one above him played a D as good as FSU.
Posted on 9/10/17 at 11:59 am to artompkins
Gfy. We all know this. We're talking anything else besides #1 bama for a change.
Posted on 9/10/17 at 12:01 pm to BamaNatureBoy
Will make a great segment on 30 for 30 when he wins the Heisman.
After a heartbreaking loss to Clemson where he was sacked 11 times, Stidham was the 114th most efficient quarterback in the nation ....
After a heartbreaking loss to Clemson where he was sacked 11 times, Stidham was the 114th most efficient quarterback in the nation ....
Posted on 9/10/17 at 12:04 pm to artompkins
quote:
Jalen Hurts @16 and no one above him played a D as good as FSU.
Yes and no....
quote:
AW QBR: Raw Total Quarterback Rating, which values quarterback on all play types on a 0-100 scale (not adjusted for opposing defenses faced)
TOTAL QBR: Adjusted Total Quarterback Rating, which values the quarterback on all play types on a 0-100 scale adjusted for the strength of opposing defenses faced.
This post was edited on 9/10/17 at 12:05 pm
Posted on 9/10/17 at 12:05 pm to BamaNatureBoy
Hard to succeed when your coach is a fricktard.
Posted on 9/10/17 at 12:13 pm to Commander Data
quote:
Come to think of it, every barner here drank the Kool-aid.
Wrong
Jangalang:
quote:
Auburn fans have yet to figure out how preseason expectations differ from reality but at least we know the bammer incumbent QB cant be any better.
LINK
Posted on 9/10/17 at 12:15 pm to BamaNatureBoy
What happened Auburn? Before the season according to Auburn fans Stidham was the preordained Heisman Trophy winner. However, he's really one of the worst rated QBs in the country. Furthermore also according to Auburn fans before the season, Auburn had the best offensive lines in the SEC, but 11 sacks in only one game to a non-SEC school. Give me a break. I don't believe Auburn is nearly as good as we were led to believe by their over zealous fans and by the pundits.
Posted on 9/10/17 at 12:17 pm to BamaNatureBoy
These ratings can't be right... surely with the record setting week 1 he had drew lock would have to be above Bentley but I don't see him anywhere...
Posted on 9/10/17 at 12:23 pm to Nissanmaxima
Actually, Etling is tied for 10th place.
Posted on 9/10/17 at 1:04 pm to Ross
quote:
He had his issues but I don't think any prototypical passer would ever succeed in Malzahn's offense.
A year or two ago Malzahn said at some booster meeting or other similar mtg that it was not his job to develop a QB for the NFL... so why would anyone want to go play in that HS scheme?
Posted on 9/10/17 at 1:05 pm to TigerFreak10
quote:
Hard to succeed when your coach is a fricktard.
Awe, come on, give Gus a break. At least he didn't substitute 22 times at QB like he did last year vs. Clemson.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News