Started By
Message
Steele has done better with LSU than Chavis has with TAMU
Posted on 10/5/15 at 2:43 pm
Posted on 10/5/15 at 2:43 pm
Looking through both teams stats minus LSU's cancelled game. Steele has done better than Chavis
Texas A&M 2015
GMS PPG TYPG PYT RYT INT TD
5 21.0 374.8 961 913 3 1
LSU
GM PPG TYPG PYT RYT INT TD
4 21.5 293.5 750 424 5 1
LSU 2014
12 16.4 305.8 1948 1722 10 1
LINK
It looks like LSU got the better end of this deal so far.
Texas A&M 2015
GMS PPG TYPG PYT RYT INT TD
5 21.0 374.8 961 913 3 1
LSU
GM PPG TYPG PYT RYT INT TD
4 21.5 293.5 750 424 5 1
LSU 2014
12 16.4 305.8 1948 1722 10 1
LINK
It looks like LSU got the better end of this deal so far.
This post was edited on 10/5/15 at 2:46 pm
Posted on 10/5/15 at 2:44 pm to TJGator1215
uh oh
This post was edited on 10/5/15 at 2:45 pm
Posted on 10/5/15 at 2:44 pm to TJGator1215
This thread definitely won't turn into a shitshow........
10/10
10/10
Posted on 10/5/15 at 2:45 pm to TJGator1215
Compare 2014 to 2015. LSU is about the same, A&M is way improved. It's really that simple.
Posted on 10/5/15 at 2:45 pm to TJGator1215
Take cover boys here come the Ags
^ One snuck in before I could quarantine the thread
^ One snuck in before I could quarantine the thread
This post was edited on 10/5/15 at 2:46 pm
Posted on 10/5/15 at 2:47 pm to RoscoeHarper
quote:
LSU is about the same,
so basically LSU saved a ton of money.
This post was edited on 10/5/15 at 2:48 pm
Posted on 10/5/15 at 2:47 pm to TJGator1215
I'm a big LSU fan and I can't say I agree with this as of now.
Posted on 10/5/15 at 2:47 pm to TJGator1215
You're just fricking SICK.
Posted on 10/5/15 at 2:49 pm to RoscoeHarper
Marginal at best considering who've you played: TAMU 2014
GMS PPG TYPG PYT RYT INT TD
12 27.3 449.0 2706 2682 5 0
GMS PPG TYPG PYT RYT INT TD
12 27.3 449.0 2706 2682 5 0
Posted on 10/5/15 at 2:49 pm to lsufball19
Well they offered him one, so what's your point?
Oh, of course you edited your post
Oh, of course you edited your post
This post was edited on 10/5/15 at 2:50 pm
Posted on 10/5/15 at 2:49 pm to TJGator1215
I don't understand this.
even without adjusting for opponent quality A&M stats look better.
OP is a UF fan? is this a troll that is working? all the LSU posts are supportive. straight up don't get it. Someone please explain!
even without adjusting for opponent quality A&M stats look better.
OP is a UF fan? is this a troll that is working? all the LSU posts are supportive. straight up don't get it. Someone please explain!
Posted on 10/5/15 at 2:49 pm to KelticMonday
quote:
So, A&M allowing fewer points per games against better competition when their defense was a pile of shite last year means that Steele is doing better than Chavis? You're a genius.
Posted on 10/5/15 at 2:49 pm to TJGator1215
TJ, this is the only time i will ever like anything you post
Posted on 10/5/15 at 2:50 pm to TJGator1215
I'm THIS close to porn bombing every Chavis/Steele thread.
Posted on 10/5/15 at 2:51 pm to RoscoeHarper
quote:
A&M is way improved. It's really that simple.
I could have improved aggy defense from 14-15
Posted on 10/5/15 at 2:51 pm to TJGator1215
27 pts to 21 and 449 yds to 374 is marginal? And our schedule thus far has been tougher in 2015 than 2014
Posted on 10/5/15 at 2:51 pm to Futures Bleak
OP forgot the sarcasm emoticon.
...and drew the tigers in with a net.
...and drew the tigers in with a net.
This post was edited on 10/5/15 at 2:52 pm
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News