Started By
Message

Spurrier is doing to SCAR what Mack Brown did to Texas

Posted on 10/6/15 at 12:24 pm
Posted by dbeck
Member since Nov 2014
29449 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 12:24 pm
Posted by stat19
Member since Feb 2011
29350 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 12:26 pm to
Damn. Some of people are weird.
Posted by tLSUtiger93
Steele Town LOL
Member since Sep 2015
1186 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 12:27 pm to
texas actually had a program to destroy, SCAR is a historically terrible program so its not a big deal
Posted by Boomer00
Member since Sep 2015
3361 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 12:27 pm to
Mack won 8-9 games every year since 2009.
Posted by EKG
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2010
43977 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 12:28 pm to
Mack Brown didn't "do" anything to Texas.
Those fools dug their own hubris-laden, LHN nightmare grave.
Posted by Lionnation1993
Member since Nov 2013
6103 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 12:52 pm to
Spurrier built South Carolina so he has a right to tear it down if he wishes
Posted by Bluefin
The Banana Stand
Member since Apr 2011
13253 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 12:54 pm to
To compare us to Texas is a compliment so thank you.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66342 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 1:00 pm to
Except USCe suuuuuuuucked pre Spurrier. Texas is a traditional powerhouse.
Posted by Nguyening
SEMO
Member since Jun 2013
9057 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 1:03 pm to
If you take Mack Browns tenure away, Texas has been pretty bad for 50 years. He had 10/11 of their 10 win seasons.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86434 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 1:04 pm to
lol at comparing brown-era texas and spurrier-era SC
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37574 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

Except USCe suuuuuuuucked pre Spurrier. Texas is a traditional powerhouse.


You type "sucked" with such aplomb and enthusiasm. It's as if you know how to do it well and are able to do it justice in your translation from the actual act over to the word on a message board.

Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
15712 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

If you take Mack Browns tenure away, Texas has been pretty bad for 50 years. He had 10/11 of their 10 win seasons.


LOL Wut?

You may want to check your history a bit. Since the end of WW2 Texas has 23 seasons with 10 or more wins and only 9 of those are Mack's.



Posted by VagueMessage
Fayetteville, AR
Member since Jun 2013
3901 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 1:13 pm to
Actually, he went 5–7 in 2010. But personally, I think programs like Texas and Nebraska are getting what they deserve after firing coaches that were doing decently. Look at Mack Brown's overall record at Texas:

1998: 9–3 (#15)
1999: 9–5 (#21)
2000: 9–3 (#12)
2001: 11–2 (#5)
2002: 11–2 (#6)
2003: 10–3 (#12)
2004: 11–1 (#5)
2005: 13–0 (#1, NC)
2006: 10–3 (#13)
2007: 10–3 (#10)
2008: 12–1 (#4)
2009: 13–1 ((#3, NC Appearance)
2010: 5–7
2011: 8–5
2012: 9–4 (#19)
2013: 8–5

That's not bad at all, even during the four "declining" years he put up decent results three times. That shouldn't be enough to get someone fired after four years, especially when they're five years removed from an NC appearance, and account for 1/4 of your school's all-time NC count, and saved you from a 35 year drought. Then look at Nebraska under Bo Pelini:

2008: 9–4
2009: 10–4 (#25)
2010: 10–4 (#20)
2011: 9–4 (#24)
2012: 10–4 (#25)
2013: 9–4
2014: 9–4 (#25, fired before the Bowl)

These results are already a step down from his predecessor, Frank Solich, who got fired for no reason.

1998: 9–4 (#19)
1999: 12–1 (#2)
2000: 10–2 (#8)
2001: 11–2 (#8)
2002: 7–7
2003: 10–3 (#19, fired before the Bowl)

Now they have Oregon State's coach and he has them sitting at 2–3 on the year. This, kids, is what happens when you allow yourself to become entitled. You look at your team being ranked at the end of every year, double digit winning seasons, and being in contention for a title run every year, and you say to yourself "… Nope, not good enough. We deserve better. I deserve better, simply because!" and then you fire a winning coach and everything rightfully falls to shite. Is Texas any happier now than they're 6–7 and 1–4 after firing Mack Brown?

So this entire topic makes no sense, especially for what Spurrier has done for South Carolina.
Posted by CockInYourEar
Charlotte
Member since Sep 2012
22458 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 1:16 pm to
pretty much
Posted by Jagd Tiger
The Kinder, Gentler Jagd
Member since Mar 2014
18139 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 1:18 pm to
could be worse, they could have:


bertbich
This post was edited on 10/6/15 at 1:23 pm
Posted by Jagd Tiger
The Kinder, Gentler Jagd
Member since Mar 2014
18139 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

Mack won 8-9 games every year since 2009.


yea he didn't eff that shitshow up nearly as much as his boss, Deloser Doddy
Posted by CockInYourEar
Charlotte
Member since Sep 2012
22458 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 1:21 pm to
Toledo
Posted by BurlesonCountyAg
Member since Jan 2014
2978 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 1:29 pm to
Texas U accomplished virtually nothing in the decades prior to Mack Brown. If you take out the 1983 season in which they almost won a MNC then they haven't accomplished much.
Posted by JGTiger
Member since Aug 2007
2938 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 1:29 pm to
Not all can pass the torch like John L and BB.
Posted by hawgfaninc
https://youtu.be/torc9P4-k5A
Member since Nov 2011
46317 posts
Posted on 10/6/15 at 1:45 pm to
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter