Started By
Message
Spring football
Posted on 4/20/16 at 12:02 pm
Posted on 4/20/16 at 12:02 pm
On College Sports they were discussing , how to make spring football more viable both from interest and financial.
First they discussed having competitive games against other schools, more along the lines of P-5 vs G-5 schools. Which is an interesting idea.
Also, they brought up , creating a 7 on 7 passing league. That would be really cool to see.
However both of these have numerous land mines and issues.
Would you like to see Spring football change , and if so how?
First they discussed having competitive games against other schools, more along the lines of P-5 vs G-5 schools. Which is an interesting idea.
Also, they brought up , creating a 7 on 7 passing league. That would be really cool to see.
However both of these have numerous land mines and issues.
Would you like to see Spring football change , and if so how?
Posted on 4/20/16 at 12:03 pm to 3rddownonthe8
quote:
Would you like to see Spring football change , and if so how?
*More scantily clad womens.
*Denotes an exclusion of Texas AM.
This post was edited on 4/20/16 at 12:04 pm
Posted on 4/20/16 at 12:06 pm to 3rddownonthe8
quote:
having competitive games against other schools
I kinda like this idea, but ultimately not. Even though regular spring games are full live (for the most part), it's still your team so you're not going to be looking to knock someone's block off coming over the middle. Despite just being a practice, you know if it was like UGa vs Clemson or something that spirits would be high and there might be some funny stuff. Also, it kinda sucks for one of the teams that they've been practicing all spring, then at the big finale they have to go on the road where none of their fans will get to watch.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 12:10 pm to 3rddownonthe8
This is big boy D1 football... Not some fricking high school jamboree.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 12:16 pm to 3rddownonthe8
Scrimmages against other schools would be an interesting idea. Just like Pre Season NFL or MLB, they won't mean anything, as in nobody cared that the Giants beat the Patriots in week 4 of the preseason last year.
I think some coaches might like it, some might not. Some coaches will hold their best players out of the game for fear of injury, some might restrict the players to a quarter or half.
They have a preseason in the NFL to find out who's going to make the final roster, or who could add value on a practice team or possible future contract. They already have their rosters set for college, so the scrimmages would be more about who can play already against college competition. They could sell tickets for interschool scrimmages, people will buy them, so there is money in the idea. However, I don't see a lot of great, all-out matchups, b/c I think most coaches are going to protect their players health in the spring. We'd see a lot of 2nd and 3rd stringers playing each other, IMO.
As far as the 7on7, who's going to coach them and how is that going to chance the NCAA rule restricting the contact or permissible hours of contact a coach can have with players in the offseason? 7on7 won't sell as many tickets either as actual scrimmages.
I don't really know what is broken with current spring football, so I don't think there really needs to be any changes. However, if they start having scrimmages b/w schools, I'd pay to go watch them still.
I think some coaches might like it, some might not. Some coaches will hold their best players out of the game for fear of injury, some might restrict the players to a quarter or half.
They have a preseason in the NFL to find out who's going to make the final roster, or who could add value on a practice team or possible future contract. They already have their rosters set for college, so the scrimmages would be more about who can play already against college competition. They could sell tickets for interschool scrimmages, people will buy them, so there is money in the idea. However, I don't see a lot of great, all-out matchups, b/c I think most coaches are going to protect their players health in the spring. We'd see a lot of 2nd and 3rd stringers playing each other, IMO.
As far as the 7on7, who's going to coach them and how is that going to chance the NCAA rule restricting the contact or permissible hours of contact a coach can have with players in the offseason? 7on7 won't sell as many tickets either as actual scrimmages.
I don't really know what is broken with current spring football, so I don't think there really needs to be any changes. However, if they start having scrimmages b/w schools, I'd pay to go watch them still.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 12:20 pm to 3rddownonthe8
Nah, I guess I'm one of the few that doesn't really care about the spring games.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 12:43 pm to RB10
I am pretty sure the A&M dance team (females) performed at the Spring game and at Friday Night Lights. They have also been incorporated into pregame ceremonies.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 12:45 pm to Chill98
Lordy hell, what's next wimminz at a footbaw game?
Posted on 4/20/16 at 12:46 pm to Chill98
quote:
I am pretty sure the A&M dance team (females) performed at the Spring game and at Friday Night Lights. They have also been incorporated into pregame ceremonies.
So, we can expect a drastic drop in attendance next year then?
Posted on 4/20/16 at 1:04 pm to RB10
quote:
So, we can expect a drastic drop in attendance next year then?
He said pre-game ceremonies. Our priorities are still in the right place, only dudes can cheer during the game.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 1:28 pm to 3rddownonthe8
I enjoy watching the A-Day game
Posted on 4/20/16 at 2:56 pm to CockInYourEar
quote:
they won't mean anything,
Wouldn't mean anything record wise. But good lord the polls would use them HEAVY.
I don't like the idea. It's trying to change something just to grab more money. The hardcore fans already enjoy spring ball. Don't need to try and force a change that will hurt the sport just to get more fans attention.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 2:58 pm to cardboardboxer
quote:
He said pre-game ceremonies. Our priorities are still in the right place, only dudes can cheer during the game.
Ah, makes sense.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 4:06 pm to 3rddownonthe8
Power 5 vs G5 would open up a whole new can of worms. Alabama pays Georgia Southern to play a spring game. Alabama then turns around and pays Jacksonville State ( who is playing Ole Miss in the Spring Game ) to take Chad Kelly out at all cost.
Seriously though, which coach would want to play a small school for a scrimmage. The small school would do anything to try and knock you off and you risk your players getting hurt over a meaningless game.
Seriously though, which coach would want to play a small school for a scrimmage. The small school would do anything to try and knock you off and you risk your players getting hurt over a meaningless game.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 4:17 pm to 3rddownonthe8
I think that every team should have their spring game but then a team can challenge another team during the summer and play either June or July.
The only time a team can play a "pre-season" game would be during the summer but they can refuse to do it. It would be an agreement between two schools to play during the summer.
The only time a team can play a "pre-season" game would be during the summer but they can refuse to do it. It would be an agreement between two schools to play during the summer.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News