Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/3/17 at 1:24 pm to MizzouTrue
quote:
Last time you came here Lock kicked y'all azzes
I remember when we came there and y'all kicked the uprights. Remember that?
Posted on 9/3/17 at 1:25 pm to CNB
quote:
South Carolina @ Mizzou discussion
aka "two mules fighting over a turnip"
Posted on 9/3/17 at 1:37 pm to CNB
The teams are actually very comparable. Both have a lot of inexperience on defense, esp in the backfield. It's going to depend on which coaching staff does a better job of getting that cleaned up by this Saturday, and I don't have a lot of confidence in our defensive staff right now. It also will depend on turnovers like it always does. maybe SC 38 - MIZ 35.
Posted on 9/3/17 at 1:55 pm to CNB
I think South Carolinas offense should focus on Conga Lines and various forms of celebration.
Posted on 9/3/17 at 2:00 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:
We played like shite in the secondary (duh), but my point is it was blown coverages and missed tackles.
So the defense is shite is what you're saying. I seriously think the only team we can stop this year is UF.
Posted on 9/3/17 at 2:02 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:
it is stuff that can be fixed.
Yes. Can be fixed if we had different coaches and different players. Lets face it, we are what we are UNTIL we are something different. Everyone could say we'd be undefeated if we didn't lose.
Posted on 9/3/17 at 2:02 pm to LouisvilleKat
quote:
I think South Carolinas offense should focus on Conga Lines and various forms of celebration.
Posted on 9/3/17 at 2:02 pm to UASports23
quote:MO ST got killed by the WR quick screen. Mizzou had several touchdowns from it. One block on db and a cloud of dust. If South Carolina can tackle and cover that play you should feel good. I didn't see much of the S. Carolina game so I don't know what you've got in the secondary.
I felt like 75% of Locks passes were intermediate passes that got taken to the house. USC ain't going to let that happen
That's not to say Lock can't make other throws but as mentioned his deep ball gets inaccurate and he makes some bad decisions.
This post was edited on 9/3/17 at 2:06 pm
Posted on 9/3/17 at 2:03 pm to LouisvilleKat
Mizzou's WR's did a great job blocking yesterday on those short routes, helping to spring the guys who caught the balls. I'd imagine the play calling will be similar, but with a bit more mixed in.
Mizzou's offense has now rang up at least 399 yards against seven straight foes, six of which were SEC teams, so I think Mizzou should be able to move the ball. They just need to convert those yards into points.
I still don't know what to think of the defense. I was shocked by how they played yesterday. Odom is a defensive guy who had done a fantastic job with all the defenses he'd previously coached. Ultimately, I suppose it's a lack of talent on Mizzou's defense.
Mizzou's offense has now rang up at least 399 yards against seven straight foes, six of which were SEC teams, so I think Mizzou should be able to move the ball. They just need to convert those yards into points.
I still don't know what to think of the defense. I was shocked by how they played yesterday. Odom is a defensive guy who had done a fantastic job with all the defenses he'd previously coached. Ultimately, I suppose it's a lack of talent on Mizzou's defense.
Posted on 9/3/17 at 2:03 pm to LouisvilleKat
Mizzou's WR's did a great job blocking yesterday on those short routes, helping to spring the guys who caught the balls. I'd imagine the play calling will be similar, but with a bit more mixed in.
Mizzou's offense has now rang up at least 399 yards against seven straight foes, six of which were SEC teams, so I think Mizzou should be able to move the ball. They just need to convert those yards into points.
I still don't know what to think of the defense. I was shocked by how they played yesterday. Odom is a defensive guy who had done a fantastic job with all the defenses he'd previously coached. Ultimately, I suppose it's a lack of talent on Mizzou's defense.
Mizzou's offense has now rang up at least 399 yards against seven straight foes, six of which were SEC teams, so I think Mizzou should be able to move the ball. They just need to convert those yards into points.
I still don't know what to think of the defense. I was shocked by how they played yesterday. Odom is a defensive guy who had done a fantastic job with all the defenses he'd previously coached. Ultimately, I suppose it's a lack of talent on Mizzou's defense.
Posted on 9/3/17 at 2:06 pm to Carolina_Girl
I remember us winning the east that year and you all sulked out of your own stadium
Posted on 9/3/17 at 2:09 pm to AaronB4Mizzou
I had this game as a potential win before the season, knowing the offense returned damn near everyone and would be better than last year and anticipating/hoping that the defense was at least slightly better than last year.
Week 1 showed the defense is drastically worse. That will be the difference in the game. SC's D won't completely shut us down, but it will be more effective at slowing us down than our open door defense.
SC 55
MU 37
Week 1 showed the defense is drastically worse. That will be the difference in the game. SC's D won't completely shut us down, but it will be more effective at slowing us down than our open door defense.
SC 55
MU 37
Posted on 9/3/17 at 2:11 pm to CNB
South Carolina 99-98
Posted on 9/3/17 at 2:16 pm to MizzouTrue
quote:
I remember us winning the east that year and you all sulked out of your own stadium
You hold onto that memory, babe. You're gonna need it to get thru what's coming your way Saturday.
Posted on 9/3/17 at 2:22 pm to reedus23
You are overreacting as always, reedus
Posted on 9/3/17 at 2:24 pm to JesusQuintana
And you're too much of a sunshine pumper my friend.
Posted on 9/3/17 at 2:41 pm to CNB
They scored 72 against a high school team. I think South Carolina will be quite a different team for Missouri than Missouri High was.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News