Started By
Message

Sources: Major Potential Shift In NCAA Transfer Rules (Immediate Eligibility)

Posted on 9/5/17 at 8:25 pm
Posted by TideSaint
Hill Country
Member since Sep 2008
75837 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 8:25 pm
LINK

quote:

In a potentially paradigm-shifting proposal, the NCAA members may vote to allow all Division-I transfers to be eligible to play immediately. The only potential restrictions are that student-athletes would be asked to meet a minimum GPA, in order to transfer immediately, and that any additional transfer would require the student-athletes to sit out a full year. The proposal, which is being solicited among members for feedback, is gaining increased traction in recent weeks, a source confirms.

In April, a 19-person task force comprised of commissioners, athletic directors, coaches, and student-athletes initially assembled under the name of Division I Transfer Working Group. Their mission was to bring a fresh approach to the often publicly maligned transfer process. Although earlier groups had been formed in prior years under similar missions, the Transfer Working Group was given more data, while also tasked with the goal of trying to create uniformity within the transfer process.

By late June, the Transfer Working Group made progress on creating uniformity in transfer rules. They contemplated two polar-opposite options: the first was to require every student-athlete to sit out a year, while the second option was to enable every student-athlete to be immediately eligible upon transferring to a new school, as long as they achieved a minimum GPA designed to lead the student-athlete ultimately to graduate.

TWG Chairman Justin Sell, Athletic Director of South Dakota State, told NCAA Associate Director of Public and Media Relations Michelle Brutlag Hosick at the time, “I am thrilled with the great progress made this week, and I’m confident we can move forward with some initial concepts for consideration in this year’s legislative cycle. We are working toward academics-based, data-driven decisions that benefit student-athletes, teams and schools.”

Within recent weeks, it has become more clear that the latter option of immediate eligibility for transfers who achieve a minimum GPA is the one gaining traction amongst members. The proposal must be completed by Nov. 1. The members of the Transfer Working Group will continue to seek feedback from fellow coaches, directors, commissioners and student-athletes in the days ahead, but it is becoming more likely that the proposal will be voted upon next April with the possibility of this going into effect as early as the 2018-19 calendar. The uniformity of applying the same rules across all sports would potentially streamline the transfer process.

Proponents of student-athletes being permitted to change schools as freely as coaches will undoubtedly laud this potential new development. The concern from some detractors may be the further encouragement of raiding smaller programs as well as the likelihood that the number of annual transfers will grow exponentially. The challenge of tracking potential tampering in pending transfers may also be a potential hazard of the new development.


Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
62719 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 8:27 pm to
So, Bama can pick up a kicker for the playoffs?
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
38862 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 8:28 pm to
WTF
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
38862 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 8:30 pm to
We may as well go ahead and open checkbooks now.

That's OK. I like Arkansas's chances. May be about the only way someone knocks these cocky Alabama blokes down a notch.
Posted by AUTubaHerd
Member since Nov 2012
1345 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 8:31 pm to
Basically, they want to kill all the smaller school's football programs. If a guy has a good season at South Alabama, what do you think he's going to do, but transfer to a bigger team?

They might as well just undo scholarship limits.
Posted by RandySavage
Member since May 2012
30814 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 8:31 pm to
Only if favor of this if a head coach leaves and/or it is not in the same conference.
Posted by JasonMason
Memphis
Member since Jun 2009
4654 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 8:33 pm to
quote:

Basically, they want to kill all the smaller school's football programs.


Can you imagine all the recruiting going on through back channels of players playing for other schools? This doesn't sound like a good idea.
Posted by DBU
Member since Mar 2014
19059 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 8:34 pm to
Jesus christ. Welcome to Free Agency in college football.
Posted by burdman
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2007
20685 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 8:34 pm to
Pandora's Box is about to be opened.
Posted by LSUAlum2001
Stavro Mueller Beta
Member since Aug 2003
47119 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 8:34 pm to
Josh Allen wouldn't be at Wyoming this year if this rule was on the books last year.
This post was edited on 9/5/17 at 8:38 pm
Posted by Lsuhoohoo
Member since Sep 2007
94346 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 8:34 pm to
quote:

The concern from some detractors may be the further encouragement of raiding smaller programs


This is concerning. I don't know how widespread it would be but there are certainly an abundance of guys that weren't highly touted recruits that turn into high quality players with NFL futures. Not sure I like the big schools having the chance to "recruit" a free agent away from lower levels once they've got game tape on him
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111496 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 8:35 pm to
quote:

Only if favor of this if a head coach leaves
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
48888 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 8:36 pm to
It's official.

Morons are running the ncaa
Posted by CarolinaGamecock99
Member since Apr 2015
21856 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 8:40 pm to
Welp rip football
Posted by TTsTowel
RIP Bow9den/Coastie
Member since Feb 2010
91640 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 8:41 pm to
I don't like this.
Posted by TigerBait1971
PTC GA
Member since Oct 2014
14865 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 8:42 pm to
This is a retarded idea.
Posted by Dave1999
Member since Apr 2016
289 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 8:44 pm to
When somebody says it's not about the money , it's about the money.
I wonder if this is a move to appease the larger schools or perhaps to
avoid pontential restraint of trade lawsuits ?
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70885 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 8:45 pm to
pretty terrible rule

although I'd love to snake a QB from someone

Eason, come on down
Posted by Dixie.Reb
Oxford
Member since Jul 2013
2377 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 9:01 pm to
Good.
Posted by el gato
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2005
2402 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 9:05 pm to
quote:

Pandora's Box is about to be opened.
This. If those dumbfricks at the NCAA think recruiting is dirty now, wait til they change the transfer rule. It will be open season on any player on any team 24/7/365.
Page 1 2 3 4 5
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter