Started By
Message
SEC towns ranked by STDs
Posted on 7/24/15 at 3:34 pm
Posted on 7/24/15 at 3:34 pm
STDs reported per 100K ranked from low to high.
1. Knoxville - 535.67
2. Baton Rouge - 576.62
3. College Station - 614.96
4. Fayetteville - 644.24
5. Auburn - 645.31
6. Columbia, MO - 713.21
7. Oxford - 741.48
8. Lexington - 746.99
9. Athens - 749.17
10. Nashville - 816.29
11. Columbia, SC - 945.58
12. Tuscaloosa - 947.65
13. Starkville - 950.36
14. Gainesville - 982.83
Most Sexually Diseased Cities in the USA
Updated for faux pas
Updated again...Two Columbia SC's listed...changed to the one with the larger sample population.
Updated numbers for Columbia, SC and Knoxville, TN
1. Knoxville - 535.67
2. Baton Rouge - 576.62
3. College Station - 614.96
4. Fayetteville - 644.24
5. Auburn - 645.31
6. Columbia, MO - 713.21
7. Oxford - 741.48
8. Lexington - 746.99
9. Athens - 749.17
10. Nashville - 816.29
11. Columbia, SC - 945.58
12. Tuscaloosa - 947.65
13. Starkville - 950.36
14. Gainesville - 982.83
Most Sexually Diseased Cities in the USA
Updated for faux pas
Updated again...Two Columbia SC's listed...changed to the one with the larger sample population.
Updated numbers for Columbia, SC and Knoxville, TN
This post was edited on 7/24/15 at 3:52 pm
26
Posted on 7/24/15 at 3:35 pm to madmaxvol
College Station might not have a ton of STDs, but every case is Ghey Super AIDS
Posted on 7/24/15 at 3:36 pm to madmaxvol
quote:
Jackson
Posted on 7/24/15 at 3:36 pm to madmaxvol
Mississippi State plays in Jackson?
Posted on 7/24/15 at 3:37 pm to madmaxvol
quote:
13. Tuscaloosa - 947.65
I guess keeping it in the family doesn't help.
Posted on 7/24/15 at 3:37 pm to madmaxvol
I blame the Alpha Phis
Posted on 7/24/15 at 3:37 pm to madmaxvol
Well damn guess I'm going to the wrong school if State plays in Jackson. What's this place here in Starkville?
Posted on 7/24/15 at 3:37 pm to madmaxvol
quote:
reported
Posted on 7/24/15 at 3:40 pm to madmaxvol
Your numbers for Columbia are wrong.
945
Wait, there are two Columbia's. One is your number and the other is above. Weird. They are side by each.
945
Wait, there are two Columbia's. One is your number and the other is above. Weird. They are side by each.
Posted on 7/24/15 at 3:42 pm to Rayburn8
quote:
Well damn guess I'm going to the wrong school if State plays in Jackson. What's this place here in Starkville?
I knew Starkville was Northeast of Jackson, but that area on the map was white with no data...I didn't go far enough North, so I just took the closest city with the most data. I've updated it now...and it turns out you have Syphilis. Sorry
Posted on 7/24/15 at 3:43 pm to madmaxvol
quote:
Columbia, MO - 713.21
The majority were a curable one. So thats a positive.
Posted on 7/24/15 at 3:43 pm to madmaxvol
Your number for Gainesville is WAY off:
Posted on 7/24/15 at 3:47 pm to madmaxvol
Oxford has 741.48 out of 100k (.00741)
Oxford population is 21,757. OM population in Oxford is 18,423. Total is 40,180.
40,180 * .00741 = 297.73
So not even 300 people in Oxford/OM have an std. Not too bad
And the OP says towns. Not necessarily including the school, so the actual figure could be even lower
For just Oxford: 21,757*.00741=161.22 people
Oxford population is 21,757. OM population in Oxford is 18,423. Total is 40,180.
40,180 * .00741 = 297.73
So not even 300 people in Oxford/OM have an std. Not too bad
And the OP says towns. Not necessarily including the school, so the actual figure could be even lower
For just Oxford: 21,757*.00741=161.22 people
This post was edited on 7/24/15 at 4:04 pm
Posted on 7/24/15 at 3:48 pm to madmaxvol
This data appears to show STD numbers based on the number of people in the area who have tested positive for STDs compared to the total population. This means that areas that test more would have higher values while low test rate areas have low values. (e.g. Considering the same populations, 500 actual STDs in an area in which 97% of cases have been reported (485) scores as more STDs than an area with an actual 2000 STDs in which 21% of cases of been reported (420). Population density in these areas further skews results.
TLDR - list is pointless
TLDR - list is pointless
Posted on 7/24/15 at 3:49 pm to madmaxvol
Keep updating because your number for Knoxville is wrong too.
Posted on 7/24/15 at 3:49 pm to madmaxvol
BR is 779.93
Posted on 7/24/15 at 3:49 pm to Korin
quote:
Your number for Gainesville is WAY off:
Move it to the East...again...there are two numbers for Gainesville...one has a population of 16,815 and one has a population of 251,417....I used the larger sample population numbers.
Posted on 7/24/15 at 3:51 pm to Korin
quote:
Keep updating because your number for Knoxville is wrong too.
Will update...again...another city with two numbers...I'll post the larger population and re-rank. After updating Knoxville's numbers, they are still the lowest in the SEC.
This post was edited on 7/24/15 at 3:53 pm
Posted on 7/24/15 at 3:52 pm to Korin
That map is all jacked up. If you zoom into street level, different cities show up from different states.
I got Sugarland, Pittsburgh and Miami just by moving the cursor over Gainesville.
G'ville does have a high STD rate though.
I got Sugarland, Pittsburgh and Miami just by moving the cursor over Gainesville.
G'ville does have a high STD rate though.
Posted on 7/24/15 at 3:56 pm to roadGator
quote:
That map is all jacked up. If you zoom into street level, different cities show up from different states.
Yeah...I posted to soon. Turns out, the map has AIDS.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News