Started By
Message
SEC Ruling on CAM
Posted on 11/16/10 at 9:06 pm
Posted on 11/16/10 at 9:06 pm
Based on history of'06 when WR's could get held as long as ball was tipped, '04 jumping on PAT, and '09 no visual evidence that Peterson intercepted the ball in bounds, as well as, the 6 yard running into the kicker penalty, we can expect a full review by the SEC on CAMSCAM.
7
Posted on 11/16/10 at 9:07 pm to icoczar
quote:
'04 jumping on PAT
that was the correct call, btw.
Posted on 11/16/10 at 9:07 pm to icoczar
wtf 
Posted on 11/16/10 at 9:09 pm to icoczar
Holy hell. You seem like a really smart one! 
Posted on 11/16/10 at 9:11 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
No the smart one is Joe Cribbs, the aubby grad who couldn't read
Posted on 11/16/10 at 9:12 pm to icoczar
Do what
Posted on 11/16/10 at 9:13 pm to beaver
This post was edited on 11/16/10 at 9:15 pm
Posted on 11/16/10 at 9:13 pm to icoczar
Please please please see the stickied thread at the very top of the page.
Posted on 11/16/10 at 9:17 pm to icoczar
No the smart one is Joe Cribbs, the aubby grad who couldn't read
Can you fricking read asshat?
If so, I suggest perusing the admin thread sticked at the top of the page.
TIA.
Posted on 11/16/10 at 9:17 pm to icoczar
quote:
No the smart one is Joe Cribbs, the aubby grad who couldn't read
Back in the late 80's early 90's I was working a full time job and a vending business on the side and one of my stops was his car wash out on Hwy 280.
Oh some of the characters that hung out there
Posted on 11/16/10 at 9:29 pm to icoczar
quote:
and '09 no visual evidence that Peterson intercepted the ball in bounds
Was bad, but it didn't cost LSU the game
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News