Started By
Message

re: SEC Championship Game host site

Posted on 2/4/13 at 11:06 am to
Posted by GalvoAg
Galveston TX
Member since Apr 2012
10835 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 11:06 am to
New Orleans is overrated but it's a way better city than Atlanta. Atlanta=Dallas with a shitty stadium.
This post was edited on 2/4/13 at 11:07 am
Posted by MsGarrison
Steele Town LOL
Member since Nov 2009
22009 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 11:06 am to
Yawn... It's still crappy.. Once you been there once its no need to go again.. Same stuff, different day.. I cant believe how the locals rave about this place.. There is nothing outside of the fq/cbd area
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 11:08 am to
No
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
36505 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 11:12 am to
quote:

What is the obsession with NO... Its an overrated city with a lot of bars and overrated restaurants with crappy music... NO should never host the SECCG, NEVER!


I'm sure you probably hear this a lot, but you're really really stupid.
Posted by Scoreboard
Madison, AL
Member since Apr 2012
2011 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 11:43 am to
The SEC Office prefers Legion Field
Posted by lsusteve1
Member since Dec 2004
41858 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 11:54 am to
What many fail to understand is that the NFL takes full control of the stadium about 2 weeks before the game.

Not to mention the countless number of hours spent discussing grids and such.

If anyone is to blame for this (an honestly, I thought it wasn't really that big of a deal), then start with Goodell.
Posted by PJinAtl
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2007
12741 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 11:59 am to
quote:

In conclusion, no.
For all the reasons she posted plus:

The parades weren't for the Super Bowl. It just happened that the game fell during Mardi Gras season. There wouldn't be huge parades in early December for the SECCG.

Atlanta will have a new, state of the art facilit in probably less than 5 years - comparable to Jerry's World - so the SEC will have the newest venue in the country to host the game, and if the weather is nice enough, they will be able to open the roof.
Posted by graychef
Member since Jun 2008
28308 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 12:01 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/9/21 at 9:55 pm
Posted by taylormade
Tumbleton
Member since Jan 2011
9802 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 12:06 pm to
i like this idea...........



Rotate between the two..

Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96003 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

with a lot of bars and overrated restaurants with crappy music
Posted by 228Tiger
Harrison County
Member since Feb 2012
12112 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 12:15 pm to
NOLA gettin the Super Bowl in 2018


Suck it
Posted by AngryBeavers
Member since Jun 2012
4554 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 12:18 pm to
quote:


Would be too expensive for the average fan. Everyone would have to fly


That's fine it keeps the poors out.
Posted by MsGarrison
Steele Town LOL
Member since Nov 2009
22009 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 2:46 pm to
I lived uptown... If i wanted to see nice houses i can see those anywhere... You obviously dont live in nola or you would know
Posted by TigersOfGeauxld
Just across the water...
Member since Aug 2009
25057 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

After watching the Super Bowl halftime show, its obvious the SEC is depriving itself by not hosting a championship game in New Orleans.


Not just New Orleans, but with the recent westward expansion Houston, Dallas, St. Louis, and Kansas City should figure into the rotation. This isn't about what a few schools want, but a decision that should benefit the conference as a whole.

The SEC is leaving a lot of money on the table by not opening up the SECG location for bids. Money that could go into the coffers of YOUR school. There's a reason the NFL bids out the Super Bowl locations. Because it makes more money that way. The SECG could and should be making a lot more money for the conference as a whole. Not to mention, giving the fans of the schools involved a different location to travel to.

Nothing against Atlanta, but fair is fair. Other major cities in other SEC states deserve a shot at hosting the biggest game in NCAA football.

Posted by graychef
Member since Jun 2008
28308 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 3:01 pm to
I just don't get how you can say there is nothing outside of the quarter or business district. I'm not a huge fan of the city but you kid yourself to say it isn't special and unique with attractive qualities for visitors.
Posted by MsGarrison
Steele Town LOL
Member since Nov 2009
22009 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 3:24 pm to
What is so unique outside the cbd/fq area... ? Please tell!
Posted by maringer11
Member since Jan 2012
1189 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

The only other cities that should even be considered are

quote:

B) Memphis

Frick no
Posted by Broyota2
Member since Nov 2010
13037 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 4:48 pm to
I'd be up for a rotation, would be cool IMO.
Posted by tween the hedges
Member since Feb 2012
20240 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 4:55 pm to
Haha, you say it shouldn't benefit just a few schools and you pick cities that are on the extreme borders of sec territory.

Atlanta is fine. Yes I'm biased but its clearly the best option to be fair to the majority and it wouldn't be good for the sec to have a half full game in Kansas City or Dallas.
Posted by GalvoAg
Galveston TX
Member since Apr 2012
10835 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 4:57 pm to
Why would the game be half full in Dallas?
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter