Started By
Message
re: Saban Publicly Supports 9 Game Schedule
Posted on 5/2/13 at 3:42 pm to Keltic Tiger
Posted on 5/2/13 at 3:42 pm to Keltic Tiger
quote:
The bitch is that bama has an easier schedule to fight thru to get to the SEC championship game,
Kind of like LSU's schedule the past couple of years
2
Posted on 5/2/13 at 3:43 pm to NYCAuburn
lol.
Posted on 5/2/13 at 3:44 pm to 1999
Yep, the rotation worked out for Bama this year as it also did for A&M and the MS schools.
However UK has been just as good as USCe historically. Hell they beat a national championship team in the reg season not to long ago, I forgot which team but they must've really lucked/backed in the BCSCG to have a reg season loss to UK.
However UK has been just as good as USCe historically. Hell they beat a national championship team in the reg season not to long ago, I forgot which team but they must've really lucked/backed in the BCSCG to have a reg season loss to UK.
Posted on 5/2/13 at 3:45 pm to spacewrangler
quote:
However UK has been just as good as USCe historically. Hell they beat a national championship team in the reg season not to long ago, I forgot which team but they must've really lucked/backed in the BCSCG to have a reg season loss to UK.
kentucky will be garbage this year.
Posted on 5/2/13 at 3:46 pm to 1999
quote:
lol.
I know it's funny people bitching about teams playing teams that they played in the previous years. I lol'd as well
Posted on 5/2/13 at 3:46 pm to spacewrangler
You try too hard.
Posted on 5/2/13 at 3:47 pm to NYCAuburn
cool bro.
Posted on 5/2/13 at 3:50 pm to NYCAuburn
LSU in recent years had played WVU, Oregon, AU, Bama and UF.
3 of those every year.
And next year we play UF, UGA, TCU...
I'm not sure what scheduling you're eluding to. We typically have a solid SOS.
3 of those every year.
And next year we play UF, UGA, TCU...
I'm not sure what scheduling you're eluding to. We typically have a solid SOS.
Posted on 5/2/13 at 3:50 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
Kind of like LSU's schedule the past couple of years
your hook is too shiny bro
Posted on 5/2/13 at 3:51 pm to cas4t
2011 schedule speaks for itself.
2012 rated as a top 10 sched by many.
2012 rated as a top 10 sched by many.
Posted on 5/2/13 at 3:52 pm to spacewrangler
quote:
spacewrangler
Posted on 5/2/13 at 3:53 pm to Keltic Tiger
quote:
The bitch is that bama has an easier schedule to fight thru to get to the SEC championship game, i.e. the NCG. And they get that advantage because...... (fill in the blanks ).
It's an easier schedule this year and last, but that is just how the cards fell. Heck, a lot of people picked Mizzou to compete for (if not win) the east last year. It just so happened that they crapped the bed last year. In 2011 LSU played UF, UK & UT, while Bama played UT, UF and Vandy. And I'm not even going to get into the 2010 schedule.
Posted on 5/2/13 at 3:53 pm to RollTide1214
quote:
Well even if you don't play Florida, LSU can't beat bama. Then yal will want to move to the easy because you can't get past Saban. Try winning something that matters, it's been since 2007, and even then you lost 2 games
Typical dickbag response. Dumbass.
Posted on 5/2/13 at 3:54 pm to cas4t
quote:
LSU in recent years had played
You seem to have left a few teams off there.
quote:
I'm not sure what scheduling you're eluding to
Cross divisional scheduling, you know what you guys bitch about.
Teams Bama played before last year USC, UGA and UF
Teams, LSU played UK UT and Vandy
Posted on 5/2/13 at 3:54 pm to Bamatab
quote:
It's an easier schedule this year and last, but that is just how the cards fell. Heck, a lot of people picked Mizzou to compete for (if not win) the east last year. It just so happened that they crapped the bed last year. In 2011 LSU played UF, UK & UT, while Bama played UT, UF and Vandy. And I'm not even going to get into the 2010 schedule.
It isn't how the cards fell. If it was how the cards fell, LSU wouldn't play Georgia in the regular season before Alabama. And we both know it.
Posted on 5/2/13 at 3:54 pm to wadewilson
Nine conference game schedules could force teams to drop that fourth cupcake out-of-conference game, which would make fans, especially season ticket holders, happy campers.
Keeping permanent cross-divisional games is an obvious ploy to keep an unfair competitive advantage against a minority of teams, and that is why it survives—fairness in scheduling is not a high priority among the majority of SEC schools—simple fact of life.
On the other hand, the Big-10 is all about being fair.
Keeping permanent cross-divisional games is an obvious ploy to keep an unfair competitive advantage against a minority of teams, and that is why it survives—fairness in scheduling is not a high priority among the majority of SEC schools—simple fact of life.
On the other hand, the Big-10 is all about being fair.
Posted on 5/2/13 at 3:56 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
It isn't how the cards fell. If it was how the cards fell, LSU wouldn't play Georgia in the regular season before Alabama. And we both know it.
A conscious decision was made to take Georgia off Alabama's schedule and put them on LSU's.
Posted on 5/2/13 at 3:57 pm to Sheetbend
quote:
Nine conference game schedules could force teams to drop that fourth cupcake out-of-conference game, which would make fans, especially season ticket holders, happy campers.
But would also jeopardize OOC rivalries UF, UGA, UK, USC
quote:
Keeping permanent cross-divisional games is an obvious ploy to keep an unfair competitive advantage against a minority of teams, and that is why it survives—fairness in scheduling is not a high priority among the majority of SEC schools—simple fact of life.
Posted on 5/2/13 at 3:59 pm to Sheetbend
quote:
On the other hand, the Big-10 is all about being fair.
You guys should join the B1G
Posted on 5/2/13 at 4:00 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
It isn't how the cards fell. If it was how the cards fell, LSU wouldn't play Georgia in the regular season before Alabama. And we both know it.
Dude, it was a stop gap schedule to get us through the expansion crap. Neither you or I have any earthly idea what factors went into making this year's schedule. If you really think that Bama or the REC imposed it's will on the schedule based on one year, then you are crazier than this guy:
Page 4 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News