Started By
Message
Saban: "It Was a Great Hit"
Posted on 10/24/16 at 9:01 pm
Posted on 10/24/16 at 9:01 pm
17
Posted on 10/24/16 at 9:02 pm to 14&Counting
Clean too
Posted on 10/24/16 at 9:03 pm to 14&Counting
No reason to apologize.
He doesn't make the rules. He doesn't enforce the rules.
He doesn't make the rules. He doesn't enforce the rules.
Posted on 10/24/16 at 9:04 pm to Pecker
quote:
He doesn't make the rules.
Nope. He just benefits from selective enforcement.
Posted on 10/24/16 at 9:05 pm to Pecker
Exactly
Posted on 10/24/16 at 9:06 pm to 14&Counting
arrogant fricking comment. that was targeting and the dude should have been tossed.
Posted on 10/24/16 at 9:07 pm to Aggie Fishfinder
Hits like that one are going to end football.
Posted on 10/24/16 at 9:07 pm to 14&Counting
Edits are awesome.
Posted on 10/24/16 at 9:08 pm to Spaceball 1
quote:
Hits like that one are going to end football.
For your playoff hopes yeah......
Posted on 10/24/16 at 9:11 pm to Aggie Fishfinder
quote:
Nope. He just benefits from selective enforcement.
No reason to argue this point one way or another. It's not his job to enforce the rules.
You should write a letter here:
2201 Richard Arrington Jr Blvd N
Birmingham, AL 35203
Posted on 10/24/16 at 9:12 pm to 14&Counting
Such a horse shite no call. I like how Birmingham decided to change the rule as the game was going on to protect bama. Clowns
Posted on 10/24/16 at 9:13 pm to 14&Counting
Until it's one of his players
Posted on 10/24/16 at 9:14 pm to Cobb Dawg
quote:
Edits are awesome.
Go to 2:40
This where Nick tells you pussies to grow a pair
Posted on 10/24/16 at 9:14 pm to Pecker
quote:
He doesn't make the rules.
He will try to get them changed though.
Posted on 10/24/16 at 9:15 pm to 14&Counting
Was definitely targeting, and the fact that the refs didn't call it is bullshite.
But it's not Saban's job to apologize for a hit that was ruled clean. Even if the ruling is laughably absolute horse shite, which it was.
What did you expect him to say? Nothing to see here.
But it's not Saban's job to apologize for a hit that was ruled clean. Even if the ruling is laughably absolute horse shite, which it was.
What did you expect him to say? Nothing to see here.
This post was edited on 10/24/16 at 9:17 pm
Posted on 10/24/16 at 9:21 pm to 14&Counting
Many of you guys are some the biggest bunch of whiney bitches I have ever seen. So funny.
Posted on 10/24/16 at 9:25 pm to AggieLandman
Don't about 20% of tackles of a ball carrier (especially a RB) involve helmet to helmet contact?
Does a kick returner deserve more protection than a RB. Maybe, but the current rule doesn't distinguish.
Either way, SEC refs have been consistent. Two weeks before in UT and A&M game on a kick return #12 from A&M launched helmet to helmet with Berry from UT. Knocked him the frick out and caused a fumble. No call for targeting.
Does a kick returner deserve more protection than a RB. Maybe, but the current rule doesn't distinguish.
Either way, SEC refs have been consistent. Two weeks before in UT and A&M game on a kick return #12 from A&M launched helmet to helmet with Berry from UT. Knocked him the frick out and caused a fumble. No call for targeting.
Posted on 10/24/16 at 9:26 pm to 14&Counting
"It was a great example of targeting and crown of the helmet trust into the facemask of an opponent"
Posted on 10/24/16 at 9:30 pm to BigOrangeBri
People argue because the rule is kind of bull shite and not very well defined. Letter of the law that's targetting, but not surprising it wasn't called. 5 minutes later aggy blocks a defender from the front and is ejected. No sense or consistency to this bull shite.
Posted on 10/24/16 at 9:34 pm to Garfield
quote:
Either way, SEC refs have been consistent. Two weeks before in UT and A&M game on a kick return #12 from A&M launched helmet to helmet with Berry from UT. Knocked him the frick out and caused a fumble. No call for targeting.
There was no helmet to helmet contact at all on that hit.
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News